- Studio: Lionsgate
- Release Date: Mar 23, 2012
User Score
7.0
out of 10
Generally favorable reviews- based on 1091 Ratings
User score distribution:
-
Positive: 862 out of 1091
-
Mixed: 109 out of 1091
-
Negative: 120 out of 1091
Review this movie
-
-
Please sign in or create an account before writing a review.
-
-
Submit
-
Check Spelling
- User score
- Most active
- By date
- Most helpful
- Most Clicked
-
Mar 23, 20123
-
Mar 23, 201210To me the Hunger Games was sort of like Lord of the Flies meets Mad Max. Has anyone read Lord of the Flies or seen Mad Max with Mel Gibson? There was also a Japanese movie called Battle Royale that came out a few years ago but was never released in the US.
-
Mar 23, 20123This review contains spoilers, click expand to view.
-
Mar 23, 201210
-
Mar 29, 20125
-
Mar 30, 20120
-
Mar 23, 201210This review contains spoilers, click expand to view.
-
Mar 23, 20129I do not get the negative reviews? The movie followed the book quite closely which I had hoped for and was not disappointed! Yes some of the richness of the book was left out but still for 2.5 hr long as is. I forgive some trimming. The acting was excellent loved Jennifer in Winters Bone and she did Katniss perfectly! I will rave and recommend friends see it!
-
Apr 5, 20121
-
Apr 16, 20123
-
Mar 23, 20125The Hunger Games = Mad Max Beyond Thunderdome with Teenagers. I'm not saying it is a bad film but much of the premise was clearly borrowed from the Mel Gibson apocalyptic trilogy of Mad Max/ The Road Warrior.
-
Apr 15, 20122
-
Apr 28, 20125This was a very average movie. Too much drawn out story and not enough action. I also kept comparing it in my head to battle royale which made it seem even worse despite the age of battle royale. I was also left in no state of worry for the main character who i didn't care about and i never felt she was in any danger.
-
Mar 23, 20123The movie was very superficial. Glossed over the backstory and pretty much all of the relationships in a rush to get to the games. Then much of the tension of the games was missing, too. Not sure I would have been able to follow if I hadn't read the book. Add the "Blair Witch" camera work, and the whole experience was disappointing.
-
Mar 25, 20121This movie sucked. Most overrated film of the year. it is du;; and boring, there is no back story. The games it self its repetitive and dull and the shaky hand filming made me vomit. What a waste of 2.3 hours. I only gave it a one because Stanley Tucci was good in it.
-
Mar 23, 20128
-
Mar 25, 20121This review contains spoilers, click expand to view.
-
Mar 27, 20125This review contains spoilers, click expand to view.
-
Mar 23, 20128
-
Mar 29, 20120
-
Apr 4, 20120
-
Mar 24, 201210Not since the Harry Potter franchise has a book been brought to life as a movie as well as this. Just as I imagined. I can't wait for the rest of the franchise to come to the big screen!
-
Mar 24, 20124
-
Mar 24, 20121If you are a teenage girl, you will love this movie. Everyone else over 25 you might as well wait for the 3rd installment to see if they make it better. The main actress is great but the plot is so thin and predictabile. I can't believe I was taken in by all the hype. A big disappointment.
-
Apr 9, 20120
-
Mar 28, 20123
-
Mar 25, 20120One of the worst movies I have ever seen.. The only reason I watched it was because we got to the movie theater late and it was the only thing playing.. Out-dated special effects, a story that left a lot to be desired and a weak ending.. Don't waste your money on this garbage
-
Apr 1, 20127They missed a few few key points of the book, but otherwise did O.K. in adapting it. Other than that, The Hunger Games was well acted (especially by Jennifer Lawrence) and just helps create the atmosphere of The Hunger Games universe well.
-
Mar 23, 201210It was just as I had imagined. There were details left out for time purposes, maybe they will be more detailed oriented in the next two movies. Fast paced, amazing adventure. Capitol was amazing.
-
Mar 23, 201210
-
30The result is an evasive, baffling, unexciting production - anything but a classic.
-
Mar 23, 201275Ross manages to keep the pacing remarkably swift, given that the games themselves don't start until halfway through the 144-minute running time.
-
80Katniss is gritty, she's flinty, she's intimidating -- and she doesn't have to compromise one iota of her femininity for it. And Ross' movie tells her story wonderfully.