- Studio: Universal Pictures
- Release Date: Apr 22, 2005
User Score
6.8
out of 10
Generally favorable reviews- based on 118 Ratings
User score distribution:
-
Positive: 81 out of 118
-
Mixed: 17 out of 118
-
Negative: 20 out of 118
Review this movie
-
-
Please sign in or create an account before writing a review.
-
-
Submit
-
Check Spelling
- User score
- Most active
- By date
- Most helpful
- Most Clicked
-
MaddieS.Oct 11, 20053I guess it was probably an ok film, but I was actually really bored.I would watch it again, but I don't want to waste my money.
-
-
laurab.Apr 16, 20052Pretty awful and stupid.
-
-
MiguelRApr 21, 20054Long and Boring. Very predictable, and annoying.You do not give a damn about what happens to the main characters, or rather wish the film ended.
-
-
NiravM.Apr 24, 20053What an egregious waste of time. Between the ad hoc character development and awesomely pathetic lines, this movie caused me to blurt out, Ignatius J Reilly style, on more than one occasion. Two key excerpts: Kidman to Penn: "What to you do when you can't sleep at night?" Penn to Kidman, after thoughtful pause: "I stay awake." And another: "Vengeance is a lazy form of grief." Gross!
-
-
EarlD.Apr 24, 20054This film takes the thrill out of thriller. It is a tedious snorefest. Sean Penn is a glum action star and Nicole Kidmon suffers with hair and accent issues. One exciting bus scene enveloped inside a trite talkfest equals the big yawn.
-
-
BilllMay 8, 20051It sucks very dissapointed Very slow moving.
-
-
PeterL.Apr 14, 20051This movie sucked. I a poor escuse for a thriller.
-
-
emmaroseb.Apr 16, 20051Boring boring boring. my god, stilted acting, predictable!!! and just plain i could barely sit through it it was so bloody boring.
-
-
TimD.Apr 18, 20053A vaguely well-intentioned mess. Great work from Sean Penn, but there were moments when even he couldn't overcome the clumsy, trite dialogue.
-
-
HaileS.Apr 22, 20054Mediocre, cliched and not particularly thrilling. Nicole Kidman is hot. Sean Penn's acting was laughable, he is a ham.
-
-
AndrewK.Apr 23, 20054Like watching "The Bourne Identity" in slo-motion... This so-called thriller crawled like a koala... Neither Kidman nor Penn played likable characters, the plot was cliched, and you will forget you ever saw it in six months.
-
-
TheDirtyOneApr 25, 20051
-
-
mcroninApr 26, 20053Even though i am huge fan of politcal thrillers, i found this ridiculously bad. it may have had its heart in the right place but the writing was atrocious, the acting was mediocre and the direction was stagnant. i feel sorry for sean penn.
-
-
BruceMay 1, 20054Tries too hard. Not very suspenseful. Definately not a thriller. Subject matter that seems interesting at first quickly turns boring. While not terrible, the acting was nothing special at all. One of the worst Sean Penn movies I've seen in a while.
-
-
AlexMMay 5, 20053With high expectations, i was left pretty flat with this one. The acting was excellent from Penn and Kidman. Keener was given nothing to work with. The only great scene was bus sequence. There were holes in it and it was quite predictable, up to the very end, which was pretty bad.
-
-
markz.Nov 4, 20051I've seen worse.
-
-
TimmyP.Apr 21, 20053This movie had all the elements needed in a suspense thriller, minus the suspense and the thrills. It was boring, predictable, and too melodramatic. What a waste of acting talent.
-
-
J.R.TaylorApr 24, 20053Boring, non thriller. Mediocre like most of the films of 2005 so far. Got really tired of Sean Penn's whiny character.
-
-
MarkB.Apr 28, 20054
-
-
BubbaFreshMay 14, 20052Sydney Pollack has found a cure for insomniacs.
-
-
StevePDec 15, 20052
-
-
90Thrillers don't get much smarter than The Interpreter.
-
80Coolly absorbing without being pulse-quickening.
-
60Solid, mature and finely acted, but intermittently daft.