User Score
6.1 out of 10

Generally favorable reviews- based on 168 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Negative: 40 out of 168

Review this movie

  1. Your Score
    10 out of 10
    Rate this:
    out of 10
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling
  3. Characters remaining: 5000 out of 5000

  1. Sep 24, 2011
    5
    Its always the same thing for Michael Bay; the picture's big, but the result is small. "The Island" is no better.
  2. Jan 27, 2012
    5
    The Island is a well acted but plain action picture, that never seems to get anywhere. Once again, Michael Bay has failed to impress me, although it is good compared to his other films.
  3. VinnyV
    Jun 29, 2009
    10
    Amazing Movie, It has action, love, humor, and conspiracy all mixed into one. Definitely a good one.
    • 1 of 1 users said yes
  4. Sidiot
    Aug 3, 2005
    1
    Minor plot holes? How about the entire movie which was stolen from every other sci fi movie that came before it? Completely farsical with insane writing and acting. Oh I forgot, it had what you morons like? Lots of car chases, with big explosions. Where were the cops? Oops! Too stupid for words.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  5. WayneK.
    Aug 3, 2005
    0
    Not even believable. One giant commercial for everything on retreaded science fiction movies. Horrible.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  6. PaulD.
    Oct 17, 2005
    10
    Awesome movie...nuff said.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  7. LingX.
    Jul 22, 2005
    5
    It was bad for the first part then it becomes worse when things started to blow up. it could have been better if it was bad boys 3. and too much sponsors made the film kinda funny.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  8. CameronS.
    Jul 22, 2005
    7
    Michael Bay finally made a movie that didn't suck.
    • 0 of 1 users said yes
  9. David
    Jul 23, 2005
    0
    Come one. Come all for your free lobotomy to this spaghetti western sci fi flop that has no original ideas and has stolen everything from other movies we have seen. It is so bad that even when the stupidy should end, they go on for another 30 minutes in a shameless ridiculous premise. I think I want to puke. Avoid like the plague.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  10. SteveB
    Jul 31, 2005
    6
    What could have been really good sci fi was ruined by two blaring plot holes and obnoxious full screen product placements. I really really wanted to give it a chance, but sprained my eyballs from rolling them back into my head too much.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  11. BruceR.
    Aug 20, 2005
    9
    I've been disappointed by many futuristic movies, but really enjoyed this one. I found it believable, and enjoyed the corporate bashing, which I thought was ironically underscored by the very large Cadillac presense.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  12. jims
    Aug 3, 2005
    7
    Yes, this movie is not great; but it is entertaining. Don't pay too much attention to the bad reviews. It is an entertaining film with a storyline that is apt for some current issues we are facing; and it has some decent action scenes, although some travel well into the category of ridiculously unrealistic.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  13. DanaM.
    Aug 8, 2005
    8
    Entertaining. Good summer fair. Go see it and leave your Oscar-review hat at home.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  14. wafia.
    Jan 5, 2006
    10
    It was a great movie, with a creative Idea about cloning , beside my special love to scarlet!!!
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  15. JayE.
    Jan 10, 2008
    6
    The film is like a watered down of Aldous Huxley's Brave New World. Watered down int the sense that it borrows many of scenarios of the Huxley's book but avoids the deeper political, social, educational, philosophical, class division themes that Huxley uses so skillfully - replacing them with a pretty shallow narrative of the sanctity of human life and the corruption of those who would exploit it. The villains of Huxley's novel are far more complex. They are not motivated by petty greed but by a philosophical conviction in the appropriateness of their actions. This makes their actions and the world they create all the more macabre and compelling. As entertainment not so bad a movie. But I was just left feeling - wow wouldn't it be great if Huxley's novels were reproduced properly and not just squeezed in to the Hollywood formula. Entertainment does not have to be mindless. Deep social commentary does not have to be boring. Expand
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  16. TaylorB
    Jan 4, 2010
    8
    Excellent movie, lots of action, keeps you rooting for a side. You watch it and find out.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  17. chip
    Dec 6, 2005
    8
    Entertaining - not at all as bad as the reviews make it seem. i think it is more akin to logan's run than matrix or blade runner. (i guess all sci-fi fils are going to be compared to blade runner and the matrix).
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  18. ZachRH
    Jul 17, 2005
    10
    "The Island" is simply a great film. It has an engaging story, wonerful characters, great acting by the two leads, beautiful cinematography, the perfect blend of action and drama, and wonderful special effects. The story may not be completely original, but the execution of the plot is wonderful. The film is endlessly captivating, and even quite humorous throughout. Imaginitive and entertaining, "The Island" is for me the best movie of 2005 so far. Expand
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  19. Fantasy
    Jul 18, 2005
    2
    Saw this in a sneak preview last weekend. Typical clone movie where the clones decide that they do not want to be replacement parts and want to live. Predictable and okay until it continues after the climax for another 30 minutes. It drags and loses all believablity as it turns into a shoot em up type western sci fi thriller. Forgotten ten minutes after you leave the theater. Another overhyped sci fi disaster of a movie, but a litte better than the awful War Of The Morons. Expand
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  20. CarolAnn
    Jul 19, 2005
    4
    Very timely and interesting premise. Not enough intelligent dialog and too many computer generated special effects. Too Long.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  21. AndyM
    Jul 22, 2005
    10
    Saw a midnight showing, LOVED IT. Michael Bay is restrained and as a result the action is secondary to the story. When the action takes place it is fast, kinetic, and the most intense of the summer. When the drama takes place, instead of riding it off as mere time to fill, Bay takes care in telling the story. Highly recommended, don't listen to reviews by people who clearly had their minds made up before they saw the film. Expand
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  22. BobH.
    Jul 22, 2005
    2
    Anyone who can't see through this fluff marketing campaign needs a lobotomy. Saw this in preview and it was awful. They took a few other idea's from other sci-fi movies and put them all in here. About an hour and a half too long. Predictable and eventually boring as you start looking at your watch. How many car chases and crash scenes can the public handle. Good doctor turns into the evil monster. Spare me and the rest of the public. Expand
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  23. DanielD.
    Jul 23, 2005
    10
    Good. amaizing. interesting and not previsible.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  24. TylerC
    Jul 24, 2005
    0
    Will Michael Bay ever make a good movie? Bad Boys, Armageddon, Pearl Harbor, and now this terrible movie. Three strikes and a person is supposed to be out, I guess here he reached on an error.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  25. HFish
    Jul 24, 2005
    8
    Better than expected; although it was more violent than I imagined (ultimately that worked to keep the pace and plot up), it was exciting and unpredictable, had effective special effects that weren't too much, and added up to pretty good science fiction moviemaking. And taking on the issue of cloning, too. I was surprised: this is Michael Bay, here, the filmmaker made fun of in "Team America". Expand
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  26. Iggy
    Jul 26, 2005
    1
    One for the blonde. Nice to look at but no material to work with in this clone of all sci fi movies. Keep away unless you had a lobotomy.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  27. JennM.
    Jul 28, 2005
    9
    I have no idea why people are rating this movie so low. It is literally one of the best movies I have ever seen. It created high emotions and gave you a heart wrenching sensation. You became attached the the characters and the story was AMAZINGLY written. The acting was superb as well. I still can't get over that movie, it's number 1 in my book! The movie is also thought provoking and perhaps is too much for some people.... Expand
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  28. BobS
    Aug 1, 2005
    10
    OK - so maybe there are a few lifted ideas here - but what movie doesn't do that? This is a summer popcorn movie to be sure - if you try and add any morality or look for some here - you will be disappointed. Sure Bay weaves in the neat little message about the future of cloning - but if if it is morality that you want; go read "Never Let Me Go" (check your local library). If you are looking for a full adrenaline, roller-coaster rush - then this is your movie. Bay's knack for chase scenes are really pushed to the limits during a highway chase in which freight train axles are used like dodge balls! One of the best chases since "To Live and Die in LA"! Long and short - don't think...just ENJOY! Expand
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  29. RickyQ.
    Aug 2, 2005
    9
    Despite having some minor plot holes, The Island delivers a great experience which should not be missed!
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  30. KenL.
    Aug 3, 2005
    7
    Good actions scenes hung on a serviceable plot with a timely twist. The ethical issues may be dumbed down for easy consumption but at least they give you something to think about when the movie is over. No complaints about the acting either. I think this movie was underappreciated.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  31. TheElusivePossom
    Aug 30, 2005
    9
    [***SPOILERS***] This film seemed to emerge from thin air, and based on positive hear-say from my friends alone, I decided it would be one worth catching. Before even entering the cinema however, I was given negative feedback concerning the movie by two of its patrons: an elderly woman and a female member of staff with a strong foreign accent I couldn't quite place at the time. Having seen the film myself, I have concluded that the elderly woman was in way beyond her depth of understanding in terms of a film depicting the future, and the member of staff, who had suggested I "check out Unleashed with Jet Li" instead, was clearly just stupid, because "The Island" is a brilliant film: a perfect blend of gripping plot, epic action and jaw-dropping visual effects. The use of real brands such as MSN and Cadillac worked well to enhance a realistic portrayal of the future world. Other touches were particularly commendable: in the viewing I saw, amongst the adverts preceding the main feature was one advertising a perfume starring Scarlett Johanssen. Imagine my surprise and delight to...(SPOILER) see the very same advert appear on a big screen during a scene in the film, revealing the real Scarlett's occupation as an actress! (END SPOILER). The acting of Ewan McGregor is pleasing (on both accounts ;)) as is the Machiavellian nature of Sean Bean's role. There is comedy here, as well as some moments of real sadness that you can see coming, yet are still moved by. The film, however, is by no means flawless: the loose ends are tied about half-way through, letting only the relentless yet predictable climax remain. Also, I take issue with anyone who is the victim of a side-on collision with a heavy goods vehicle, who then steps out of the car with perfect make-up. All in all, this movie is one of the golden releases this year, and much better than Charlie and the Chocolate Factory, which I regret seeing to an unholy level. Expand
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  32. Don'tCare
    Aug 5, 2005
    8
    Alright so it wasn't miraculous but it was good summer fun that was well executed. A bit to much product placement for my taste but as a summer movie it's pretty well done. Just eat some popcorn and shut up, you'll be fine. Scarlett Johanssen is also pretty good. Funny, original, entertaining. People, it's entertainment, do all movies have to be oscar worthy to be fun and enjoyable? Michael Bay has made the movie he wanted to make and it's pretty cool. Go check it out. Expand
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  33. BobT.
    Aug 6, 2005
    5
    Hollywood não resiste à tentação e acaba sufocando boas idéias com excesso de efeitos, explosões e perseguições em demasia. Pena.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  34. MikeD.
    Aug 7, 2005
    3
    A used, junk-food waste of time and money. There is nothing of value in this movie. But, then again, I've never liked a Bay movie.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  35. Tonydannie
    Aug 7, 2005
    9
    This was an unexpected surprise! The film grabbed me and never let me go. Bay has redeemed himself after the dreadful Bad Boys 2. Making this film my favorite over The Rock. It steals from Logan's Run and THX-1138. And again their were a bit to much of speed chasing. But Bay toned it down a bit with one car chase and an aireal chase. But It is not such a big deal. At least it was not 6 car chases unlike the previous Bay flick (There i go again. Bad Boys 2). I left Satisfied. And you would be too. The film was good fun. Expand
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  36. StagePro
    Nov 13, 2006
    9
    I have to say, I also LOVED this movie, but I give it a 9 because hardly ANYTHING I see gets a full 10! lol - When I saw the movie poster and trailer for this flick I thought OH NO, my dear Scarlet sold out to a crap Michael Bay film! NO NO!!! Well, I gave it a chance when it came onto DVD and I was immediately engaged and oh so pleasantly surprised! Like others mentioned here, it grabs hold of you and never let's you go, and I can't stand action thrillers normally. The human subplot is really truly touching and I am even proud to say I cried at the end of this film for like a half an hour! I also had to run out and get the soundtrack!! Boy am I sap eh?? Scarlet and Ewan really make nice chemistry and the acting is truly superb. I really felt as if I caught a glmipse of where are future could go...as a race if we don't watch ourselves with this cloning business. SEE this movie, check it out, it was worth the 2 hours, it really was... HAIL SCARLET! She is so endearing... Expand
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  37. TonyB.
    Jan 10, 2006
    3
    One of the more provocative scientific-ethical issues of our time, cloning deserves to be the subject of a good film. "The Island" is not that film. What it is is a loud, clumsy and overly-plotted bore.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  38. AngryMan
    Jan 23, 2006
    1
    What the hell was that?! I'm getting really ****** off with the whole world of film making, as well as with that surprisingly large proportion of people who sincerely believe that stuff like this is of a high standard. I guess it's a sign of the times we're living in. 1 point goes to all those whose combined efforts resulted in me paying to rent this **** and suffer it for 30 minutes before swiching it off in disgust. Expand
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  39. TinaW.
    Jan 26, 2006
    10
    I saw this movie in the theater with a couple of friends and we were all absorbed in the intensity of the action. I'm not saying it was some profound piece of art, but it was highly entertaining. Even the large amount of product placing became a fun game of 'who can spot the most'. We were all highly entertained, and got into it and genuinely had fun at the movies. We also now own the dvd because of how fun it was. Expand
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  40. SeanD
    Jan 4, 2006
    9
    While slightly over the top, fans of the sci-fi, action-adventure genre will not be disappointed. Non-stop Action from beginning to end which is beautifully shot.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  41. SteveP.
    Feb 8, 2006
    9
    O.K. i don't care what all the "Movie Snobbs" have to say about this film it was great. Who says that a movie has to be boring to have a deep message. This movie thought a little long and laging was extermily entertaining to watch. and the message was very deep, Human life is not a probuct and should not be created for destoryed like one. we can't go around creating humans like iPods only to chop them up and seel there livers. if you are pro-cloning then go see this film, i was but this made me re-think that. Expand
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  42. DaddyO.
    Jun 30, 2006
    9
    Great film. LOTS of style. One of the best sci-fi's in a while. This film can be split in half; a futuristic sci-fi and then a "Bad Boys"-like action movie. Strange combination. This film would get a 10 if it didn't get carried away with explosions and blowing crap up. For me that spoils it coz you "here we go again, more hollywood CGI". But even if you're not a geek or into sci-fi, u have to see this film for Scarlett Johansson. Expand
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  43. MattF
    Mar 14, 2007
    7
    First off: I saw this movie mainly because of Scarlett Johansson, and partially because the story sounded compelling. In both ways the film didn't disappoint. The main issue I had was that just about everything in the movie, from start to finish, seemed forced; including the acting, the plot, and especially the action. However, it had a nice concept and it entertained pretty well. It's just unfortunate that it's intellectual potential wasn't really met. Expand
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  44. Jack
    Oct 14, 2008
    10
    Spectacular. Music was nice also.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  45. RobD
    Sep 27, 2008
    8
    Great futuristic action movie in typical Michael Bay blockbuster style. Good cast!
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  46. MarkM
    Jan 25, 2009
    10
    I don't know how these critics come off with their harsh comments, yet they provide no substence with their argument. This was a fantastic movie and the editing and special effects were nicely done.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  47. *confidential
    Jul 9, 2009
    9
    I don't understand what all the critics are complaining about. Good acting, good story, good visuals, good audio.. what else are they looking for?
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  48. ArielG
    Dec 1, 2005
    7
    In terms of its visual details and aesthetics it was wonderful, especially in the beginning when they're in the facility. If the book Brave New World was made into a movie, this is how I imagine the environment would look like. The concept and the story was okay, but somehow the movie didn't mesh towards the end. It must've been because of all the car chases and helicopter chases, where it just became a typical Michael Bay action flick. Felt like I was watching Bad Boys II again. Overall, it's not too bad, but also not too good. I added an extra 2 points to my rating score because of the gorgeous Scarlett Johansen's presence, even though I think her talent was wasted here. I found Ewan McGregor pretty good in his role. Expand
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  49. BitBurn
    Dec 23, 2005
    8
    This sci-fi was awesome. Fans of the genre, don't miss it! And Scarlett looks delicious! ;-)
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  50. JonathanZ.
    Oct 3, 2005
    6
    Oh, Michael Bay. Beloved director of such cinematic masterpieces as Bad Boys II. Despite that, seeing the previews for his latest romp filled me with no small amount of hope, so I rushed off to see the sneak preview. (I left the theater having enjoyed myself.) Recently, however, I saw the theatrical release with a group of friends, and I found myself with mixed feelings... If you know Bay, you know that car chases, gunfire, and things blowing up usually take priority over everything else--including of course, believable characters and an intelligible plot. Which is why I was so shocked to find that the first portion of the film is a well done science fiction parable along the lines of Brave New World. Yes, it does draw heavily (or "rip off," as we like to say in the business) from a ton of other cinematic sources, not the least of which being Logan's Run. For a while, I was blessedly unaware that I was watching a Michael Bay film. Even the score was whimsical and moving, not the generic pulse-pounding shlock that usually goes for a soundtrack in an action movie. Sadly, however, all good things must come to an end, and after about an hour, the film takes a total schizophrenic turn and starts focusing on explosions and loud noises rather than anything remotely approaching intellectual. Certain sequences were included just because Bay thought they'd look cool, I'm sure of it. The requisite "passionate" scene was totally nonsensical, because we'd been told that the main characters had no sense of gender awareness. I'm not saying the first part is perfect, but it trumps the second by a long shot. If you do watch the movie, just be prepared to switch off your higher functions for the latter hour and a half. Expand
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  51. JohnB.
    Jul 16, 2005
    6
    This cloning movie is easy to follow and makes you wonder where in the world are we headed - in real life.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  52. PeteD.
    Jul 18, 2005
    2
    Make sure you are ready for a long commercial. I counted about 25 product placements from Mack Trucks to Ben and Jerry's Ice Cream. Some might say this lends validity to an imagined future, but I just think it detracts from an already weak piece of cinema. To be fair the first 30 minutes were engaging with a rather poignant scene involving Michael Clarke Duncan pleading for his life. The premise could make for a thoughtful look at many interesting issues, most directly cloning. Unfortunately, like his other films, Bay takes an interesting and original foundation and builds upon it using every piece of action movie rebar imaginable. The audience is left with nothing but a series of action movie clichés including the old “vehicle through the office building” gag. If you are looking for regular summer fare to numb your head for a couple hours this movie is for you, but if you are looking for something a little more heady- don’t be duped by a clever marketing campaign as this film is far from thought provoking. Personally I hope Michael Bay never gets cloned. Expand
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  53. LarryW.
    Jul 21, 2005
    2
    Starts slow and then goes insane as it becomes shoot em up end to end predictable fable. The plot has more holes than Carter has little liver pills. Doesn't Hollywood have any idea as to how to make a movie anymore? Disappointing.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  54. JZ
    Jul 21, 2005
    4
    You have seen this all before. And in a shorter version too. Take some elements of Logans Run, a dash of Blade Runner, a tad of Coma and a hint of Matrix and you have The Island. It runs about 20 minutes. I am sure it will be fine as a sunday DVD when you are hung over to watch.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  55. Reggie
    Jul 20, 2005
    1
    Good beginning and then falls off a cliff. Too stupid to discuss.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  56. JamesP.
    Jul 22, 2005
    9
    All movies are stories retold. This telling of the classic sci-fi awareness and escape tale is spun quite well and provides solid entertainment. Humorous moments are mixed with well choreographed action sequences. It does run a bit long, so don't drink a lot before or during the show.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  57. KyleA.
    Jul 22, 2005
    7
    For what it is, its not bad. You cant go into this expecting a great movie. If you ignore the plot holes and the "cloned" story line, it is entertaining. But go to a matinee, its not worth $10, parting with $6 or $7 isnt bad if you want to have a good time.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  58. PaulF.
    Jul 23, 2005
    8
    I have to admit this movie was much better than I expected. The concept was a 10 the acting an 8, the direction the film went a seven, some of the special effects were fantastic like the flying motorcycles and the hoovering train, and the clones in progress. This is one of those movies that could have been great but fell a little flat by the end. You really thought they were going to kick ass in the end but you leave the theater thinking they were mostly lucky. Also it smacked heavily of Logans run. Not a bad movie to emulate, but come on people lets not plagiarize. On a tangent Logan's Run that would be a great movie to remake. Overall The Island is worth seeing in the theaters. It also allows one to reflect on some of the very real issues we are facing today with cloning and stem cell research, etc. Our ethics need to catch up with our science before we start playing God too much. Expand
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  59. Gettford
    Jul 23, 2005
    9
    I had a great time with this movie. I agree with Ebert that it just works. Scarlett & Ewan are terrific, but it's really Djimon Hounsou who steals the show. His back story caps the plotlne nicely. If you're into sci-fi and want to see a better version of the Minority Report or AI, enjoy this one.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  60. Irky
    Jul 23, 2005
    7
    Pretty good. Real entertaining. Scarlet Johansson is just...grrrrrr. Wow. Anyway, the action is intense and believable. Best piece of advice I've heard about this movie: turn off your brain and just have fun. Very true. Everything flows nicely, and we see justice served. I would recommend a matinee.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  61. HB
    Jul 24, 2005
    8
    Good stuff. Scarlet is tops in this 'Brave New World' meets 'The Rock' sci-fi silly fun film.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  62. JRI
    Jul 24, 2005
    10
    This movie had everything the 'Born identity' and its sequel did, which is action/ great plot/ great acting/ and great direction. Everything is fresh and new in this movie. A bit lengthy but holds your interest in this action packed sci-fi movie. If anything , go to a matinee, its well worth it!!!!!
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  63. JamesD
    Jul 24, 2005
    0
    Mindless pap. Insulting to watch, and even more insulting to think that I acctually sat through 2 and a half hours of it. Ewan McGregor was fine, but Scarlett Johanssen, good lord girl, I'm dissapointed. After impressive turns in films like "The Igrl with the Pearl Earring" and "Lost in translation", this is pathetic. She goes from playing intriguing and complex characters to the standard summer blockbuster dough head blonde. And I have no problems with product placement in films, even if it's obvious - take "Minority Report" - whole lotta ads in there, but they made sense in terms of the world that they exsisted in. But for the love of Pete, can some one tell me why there would be Auqafina etched all over the place, and Xbox inside the clone facility? Where is the sense in that? In summation - one of the worst, if not THE worst film I have ever seen. Expand
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  64. RobertL.J.
    Jul 24, 2005
    7
    I am very tired of so many reviewers (both professional and the public) always skewering science fiction or fantasy films by saying that they borrow or steal from other such movies and, in the words of one reviewer, "have nary an original idea". How many of the thousands of the "character-driven" dramas, or comedies, are so completely original, without any elements (premise, plot, characters, acting styles, settings, endings) that have appeared in other movies the past 50 years? Sure, every great or even good movie comes up with its own unique combination of these elements, but few are truly 100% original. I am NOT saying that "The Island" is a "great" movie. I am saying that science fiction and fantasy films (and also horror and action-thriller films) suffer from this double-standard of comparisons that "character-driven" dramas and comedies are less often subjected to. I like the imagination, even when borrowing from past works, that conceives a dystopian futuristic world. Expand
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  65. JustinC.
    Jul 25, 2005
    5
    Very,very,very cool concept, but they could've done a whole lot better with everything else.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  66. MilesN.
    Jul 25, 2005
    7
    Although this movie really isn't very good, it sure is entertaining. The car chases and myriad explosions are gratuitous but satisfying. As is Scarlet Johansson. Sigh. I'm with Daniel D., definitely not previsible.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  67. TheTruth
    Jul 26, 2005
    5
    This mediocre movie is a complete and blatant rip-off of Michael Marshall Smith's novel "Spares". I don't even see how they can get away with such thievery. Anyway, read the book... it is brilliant and much better than the movie. The writers should be ashamed of themselves for such obvious plagirism
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  68. RachelL.
    Jul 27, 2005
    1
    Too awful for words.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  69. Marty
    Aug 11, 2005
    8
    I was prepared to hate this movie but it was a well paced, fun action movie with good actors. Granted it was sci-fi but within the genre I really loved it.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  70. MattS.
    Aug 15, 2005
    8
    How can you say this was bad? Ok, it might not have been the most believable or unpredictable storyline, but there was some good acting, good special effects and a good cast.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  71. JohnM
    Aug 15, 2005
    5
    I'm a reprehensible film snob, and NEVER go to "blow-em-up-real-good" action pics -- but after an extraordinarily stressful couple of weeks at work, I needed desparately to numb my brain. As such, this movie works perfectly. Scarlet wields a mean nail gun, and the Dwell magazine-style sets were cool to look at. And if you're able to completely turn off the part of you that is repulsed by hopelessly sexist dialogue ("Don't EVER give a woman your credit card"), then you might find the underlying story to be just intriguing enough. Expand
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  72. KelR.
    Aug 19, 2005
    10
    My favorite movie of all time!
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  73. Persia
    Aug 2, 2005
    8
    I really enjoyed this movie. It made me think about American society aned its effects on our humanity.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  74. vermind.
    Aug 5, 2005
    7
    This film wasn’t half as bad as I expected. It was certainly more watch-able than Batman Begins and War of the Worlds. The dialogue and the acting were a notch up from what you would normally get in an action flic. Ewan McGregor’s smile lights up the whole screen, and Scarlett Johansson had that sort of vulnerable but tough quality that I don’t think many actresses can really pull off. I couldn’t really see why it got such harsh reviews. Expand
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  75. ExotixS.
    Sep 14, 2005
    10
    Well, like many others remakes, remixes this year The Island is very enjoyable and good demonstration of possible tommorow technology (without FlyTrain Till 2034), but it can suprise you with the latest camera, fx effects, music and attractive stars...what else can you aspect from remake? This movie is more realistic then deep scfi Matrix XXXRunner... 50% for the story and 50% for good demonstration of near future. Expand
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  76. CriticsR.
    Sep 9, 2005
    7
    Entertaining. Doesn't all make sense of course, but it was fun to watch.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  77. BubbaFish
    Jan 12, 2006
    10
    Not since BAD BOYS has Michael Bay made such a creative piece of work. A thrilling ride!!!
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  78. GaborA.
    Jan 18, 2006
    2
    Definitly not one of the worst movies of all time, perhaps the year, but undoubtadly one of dumbest. Simply too stupid for words to describe.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  79. MarkB.
    Jan 21, 2006
    3
    America's Most Obnoxious Director tries something different with this trite, contrived and unconvincing sci-fi film, and as a result gives us two bad movies for the price of one. The first hour is a futuristic fantasy about a highly structured, repressed society of slaves, drones and worker bees held in check not only because the system they work under is all they've known, but also by the promise of winning a daily lottery whose prize is supposedly a permanent retirement on an idyllic island but is in reality...well, a permanent retirement, anyway. This will prove shocking and illuminating only to those who have never seen Beneath the Planet of the Apes, Logan's Run or any of hundreds of other bad-new-world films; forget that some of the people involved with the obscure B-movie Parts: The Clonus Horror took the moviemakers to court, I saw the whole lottery premise played out on a decade-plus-old rerun of Sliders on DVD not long ago! Lack of originality is, of course, not a mortal sin, but mind-numbing idiocy is: this is the kind of movie that in order to work requires that not one but two major characters stumble across a highly elaborate, sophisticated security system in order to see Things They're Not Supposed To See, else you don't have a movie; the most effective and powerful lesson the film teaches is one that all non-homeschooled sixth graders already know, namely, if you're really nice to the cafeteria lady you get extra treats. Once our heroes (Evan McGregor and Scarlett Johansson) discover the big secret and the chase is underway, director Michael Bay (The Rock, Bad Boys, Bad Boys 2) stops sucking in his gut and reverts to just plain sucking as usual, giving us plenty of everything we love to hate him for once again: loud, irritating noise, an almost gleeful heartlessness toward innocents caught in the crossfire and their property, self-referential humor that isn't funny, promiscuous use of product placement that's truly corrupt both in number and inappropriateness, criminal misuse of Steve Buscemi, and the editorial philosophy of why settle for one shot when 32 will do even better? (As always, Bay cuts his own throat with the latter; a potentially spectacular stunt involving an armored truck doing a 360-degree flip is robbed of all effectiveness because Bay shoots it from several different angles and insists on showing them all to us.) Some people have praised Bay for having te self-discipline to not revert to his most irritating trademark techniques until almost halfway through the movie; to me, this is like praising an infant because he went for an hour WITHOUT soiling his diaper before finally doing so. Acting is mediocre or nonexistent with one exception: Ethan Phillips is actually quite touching as a drone who never wins the lottery and doesn't realize how lucky he is; McGregor gives a performance as dull as his vocal turns in Robots and Valiant while the sublime Johansson (Lost in Translation, Match Point) not only does her first very bad work but is photographed and costumed to look like Tara Reid. That's unforgivable...even by Michael Bay standards! Expand
    • 0 of 1 users said yes
  80. TimN.
    Mar 3, 2006
    9
    Great movie, starts quick and doesn't let you down til the very end credits. It seems the critics didn't care for this movie, but check it out, you will not be disappointed. I would say this is the best sci-fi thriller since the Matrix. See it today!
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  81. NateH.
    Feb 13, 2007
    6
    It is one of those movies that I wasn't sure I liked, and I was fairly sure was not quite good, but nevertheless remained in my mind for days afterward. Worth a rent.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  82. MilaM.
    Mar 27, 2007
    1
    One movie shows the struggle between two people and their search for more knowledge. Reality is, the people really aren’t people, and they have no idea what the truth means. They are clones, made to replace organs and produce children for their rich counterparts. Only one believes there is more to life than the organized world he sees. He knows that the Island has to be more than it is rumored to be. With help from a friend, he finds the outside world to be more than just daily routine. He finds himself, or the original of himself, and tries to convince him that the world must know the truth. He believes that with a little honesty, everything will be ok. But it wasn’t. It was a cheap plot, a bad mix of sci-fi and action, and one shoe away from being the cheesiest movie of the year. The Island (2005) was created to entice the senses and make you think about what technological advances may come around one day. I was intrigued by the interesting interpretation of the future of health care, as well as the one-liners throughout the movie. And yet, I spent a lot of time focusing on how brainwashed Scarlett Johansson sounded and whether or not Ewan McGregor would be punched in the face from asking too many questions. It seemed many viewers of this film were brainwashed as well as seen by the rave reviews. The intent was good, but the camera angles made me nauseated, the casts’ voices made me think I was on laughing gas, and the entire set is either way too boring or has way too much going on to keep track. The quick change from a science fiction hypothesis to an action-packed chase is so drastic I had to wonder if it was the same movie. As an avid movie-watcher, I would not recommend this movie unless you have a morbid fascination with the color white. Expand
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  83. ShawnS.
    Mar 18, 2008
    2
    The very definition of a thundering bore. Briefly, there's a chase sequence that never engages us because it substitutes any real sense of hide-and-seek, or imminent discovery, for shots of people running, helicopters whirring, voices shouting... all editing, no intelligence. But here's how bad the movie is: it wastes a luminous Scarlett Johansson with a mannequin script. THAT's the real crime here. Expand
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  84. WillD
    Apr 21, 2008
    8
    A good Sci-Fi yarn that entertains both with the early imagery and themes of totalitarian oppression & human curiosity in the face of corporate propaganda and the later action sequences in a futuristic environment. Scarlett Johansson is irresistible as doe eyed Jordan 2 Delta & Ewan McGregor equally likable as curious but naive Lincoln 6 Echo. The ending is perhaps a little two Hollywood for some (those who enjoyed the end of Orwells 1984) but this is after all mass entertainment & not everyone likes to leave the cinema with fuel for deep introspection. Expand
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  85. Oenmeteenk
    Nov 26, 2005
    3
    Starts of interesting, but then falls deep in a mindless and plotless action flick, with a really cheesy ending. Too bad.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  86. KD
    Dec 13, 2005
    9
    Starts off slow, in an interesting way. then explodes off the screen with near non-stop action.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  87. gabec.
    Dec 19, 2005
    8
    Really good movie. I don't completely understand why this didn't do better in the box-office (I rented it). Good Sci-Fi, Action movie. Good acting, great sets, interesting topic, original action. I can only think that the movie went too long and didn't resemble anything in the trailers that I saw. I hate when trailers sell the movie incorrectly. I really liked this movie. Definitely not a sci-fi in the same league as Matrix/BladeRunner. It is sci-fi-lite... mostly an action movie with sci-fi aspects and plot. Expand
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  88. AndyT
    Dec 23, 2005
    5
    A familiar life is not what you think it is plot that turns your mind upside down but you'll forget about the next day. Some good action. Plot moves a little slow. almost bored me with the is it going to end yet?...Not terrible but not worth anything more than a rent.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  89. MelissaM
    Dec 27, 2005
    5
    If you can get past the stupid premise, not a bad action movie. Could have been bettter and definitely not Ewan's best work.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  90. LarryH.
    Dec 6, 2005
    8
    Liked the visuals, liked the pace, loved the message.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  91. KenK.
    Jul 19, 2005
    9
    I loved this movie. It was a movie I had been looking forward to all summer. I thought the premise was great: People living in a sealed and controlled facility under the pretense that the outside world is decimated and uninhabitable when in fact they are clones created for the sole purpose of supplying spare, viable organs for their original counterparts. I think the actors are wonderful. Ewan McGregor is a cool guy and Scarlett Johansson is hot! The direction of the film was kinetic and even so, it was un-Bay-like. There weren’t all of these choppy, quick cuts in the film. As he is setting the story up, he actually seems to sit the camera down on the floor and walk away allowing the actors to play their parts. When the action scenes arrive, however, that’s when Bay’s adrenaline kicks in and he resorts to old habits. (This is a good thing.) The car chase is reminds me of the Matrix Reloaded but it is executed even better I think. The way the future was portrayed was interesting as well. The vehicles in the movie were real. The production team used late model cars such as the 2005 Dodge Magnum for agency vehicles and the 2005 Chrysler 500 for police units. Even Buscemi’s character, McCord, is seeing driving a late model Chevy SSR pick-up truck. (It was weathered and beaten and it even had red flames painted along its surface.) I was actually asking myself why would someone deface a beautiful, pristine truck like this. It was then I realized that the story took place in the future and the truck was now old. There was humor as well, especially when both of the heroes are on the lam and meet up with their ‘sponsors’, the ones they were cloned from. All and all, it was a very enjoyable film. It is a great way to spend two hours. I must add that this is Michael Bay’s best film to date. Expand
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  92. dannyl.
    Jul 21, 2005
    5
    Scarlett Johannson - soooo hot. Rest of movie -- not so much. Worth seeing? Just for Kendelee and the explosions. Save your money.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  93. Harry
    Jul 22, 2005
    1
    Another summer clunker which had promise and disintergrates before your very eyes. I am glad it is about cloning because it has stolen every idea from other movies it has cloned. What a joke. About thirty minutes too long when it gets totally ridiculous. Avoid at all costs unless you had a lobotomy or wish to check your brains in at the door.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  94. PaulT.
    Jul 22, 2005
    8
    A solid summer action yarn. If it's pathos and angst that really strokes your noodle, this ain't your fare. But Ewan and Scarlett make a charismatic and compelling duo, and there are some pretty solid moments and great action sequewnces. The tension never lets up, and the tone manages to stay sufficiently sardonic to pose the question of whether or not our heroes will come to a happy or ironic ending. Expand
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  95. Luigi
    Jul 23, 2005
    0
    If you like this I would recommend a lobotomy.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  96. JimM.
    Jul 24, 2005
    8
    I loved this movie! It's a good sci-fi, no it's not totally "original," but what sci-fi is? Has a little bit of Logan's Run (a sci-fi classic), and the Matrix. Like other sci-fi movies in this genre, it presents an artificial soceity (of clones) who are pacified with a mythical reward called "The Island" (e.g., heaven). Ewen McGregor is great (better acting than Star Wars). There are two parts to the movie, the first part is a futuristic sci-fi, and then when the heros escape it becomes a good action flick, with some of the best action/chase scenes I've seen (and I'm not an action movie buff). The special effects and soundtrack are great. Don't listen to the sour critics who don't get it... it is a good movie. Expand
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  97. DaveB.
    Jul 27, 2005
    7
    Way better than that poor excuse for a movie called Revenge of the Sith. What ever happened to having fun at the movies. Everybody seems to over analyse movies these days. You go into a movie by a director like this and u get what u pay for.....explosions and more explosions. If u want some serious movies go to some film festival with all the rest of the non-fat, double foam latte drinkin', SUV drivin' morons. Expand
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  98. ChadS.
    Jul 28, 2005
    8
    In the hands of another director, "The Island" would feature only one scene in which The Walking Stem Cell Research Extrapolations have to skirt capture from the authorities. Precious running time is wasted on smashing stuff (weights instead of cadavers this time), which normally wouldn't seem so jarring in a Michael Bay film, but this time, there's a self-awareness to the action scenes. It's as if Bay is saying, "When can I stop being a science-fiction nerd and start being me, the real me?" "The Island" engages you in thought, and then Bay gives the older audience some time-outs later in the film, as to remind them that Hollywood makes films for teenage boys. But Bay's "improvements" doesn't really hurt the film's intriguing premise. This is because the filmmaker seems to exhibit some unbeknownst constraint, and a goodly amount of fidelity to the screenplay in the film's first half. "The Island" tells such a great story, even a caveman couldn't louse it up. Expand
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  99. ibrahimC
    Aug 25, 2005
    2
    I've seen cadillac, puma, msn...advertisements, not a movie. I regret.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  100. MohammedR.
    Sep 16, 2005
    8
    Very good movie. The first half of the movie is somewhat slow. But the rest is action packed. The movie works well together as a whole.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
Metascore

Mixed or average reviews - based on 38 Critics

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 13 out of 38
  2. Negative: 4 out of 38
  1. Starts off an aggressively derivative sci-fi thriller, then morphs into an above-average chase melodrama.
  2. Reviewed by: Justin Chang
    60
    Frenetic actioner about refugees from a genetic cloning plant starts off intriguingly, burns up its ideas in the first hour and pads out the rest with joltingly repetitive action sequences.
  3. Reviewed by: Richard Schickel
    50
    For all the menace of its techno-prattle, its implicit boosts for humanism and its swell production design, the picture is finally a bore. Sci-fi was more powerful when its special effects were cheap and crude, its ideas simple but potently stated.