Metascore
69

Generally favorable reviews - based on 17 Critics

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 13 out of 17
  2. Negative: 2 out of 17
  1. Among cautionary tales of gloom-and-doom, it may out-gore Gore, but it doesn't entertain.
  2. Reviewed by: David Wiegand
    25
    The film isn't very interesting because it isn't well made.
User Score
5.3

Mixed or average reviews- based on 11 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 4 out of 7
  2. Negative: 2 out of 7
  1. Jan 2, 2011
    1
    The most boring piece of crap masquerading as a thriller I have endured since M. Night Shyamalan's Signs. By the time anything actuallyThe most boring piece of crap masquerading as a thriller I have endured since M. Night Shyamalan's Signs. By the time anything actually HAPPENS ( a good 20 minutes in), I no longer gave a damn what happened to any of these stupid people. I give it 1 star for the fact that it was in my On Demand package and not something I ponied up eight bucks to see. If the ending redeems it, my apologies. I gave up with half an hour left to go. Full Review »
  2. EdG.
    Dec 27, 2008
    8
    Creepy. Haunting. Claustrophobic. Well-acted, even if Ron Perlman's character is written as a one-note villain. Beautifully shot, Creepy. Haunting. Claustrophobic. Well-acted, even if Ron Perlman's character is written as a one-note villain. Beautifully shot, permeated with dread. James LeGros does fine work. Fessenden and his cinematographer turn the frozen nothingness into a living, breathing, palpable and inexorable adversary. Full Review »
  3. JoeT
    Sep 13, 2008
    8
    Larry Fessenden... I like you. Fans of heady horror and/or The Thing would do well to stick their murder boners into this beast.