- Studio: Buena Vista Pictures
- Release Date: Dec 10, 2004
User Score
7.0
out of 10
Generally favorable reviews- based on 199 Ratings
User score distribution:
-
Positive: 147 out of 199
-
Mixed: 11 out of 199
-
Negative: 41 out of 199
Review this movie
-
-
Please sign in or create an account before writing a review.
-
-
Submit
-
Check Spelling
-
Apr 3, 20110Sadly more rubbish inflicted on the public from Wes Anderson. This film is appalling, there are no redeeming qualities and I can only suggest if you wish to actually die of boredom, then watch this film. With the Royal Tennebaums it takes pride of place as being the joint worst film I have ever seen in my life.
-
KristinaE.Jul 16, 20083
-
-
DougZDec 17, 20070I just don't "get it." This film sets a mood, but doesn't go anywhere. If the idea of a plot is optional, you'll love this film. I couldn't help but feel like characters were introduced just so the actors could work with Wes Anderson. Wes, you stole two hours of my life!
-
-
DennyEJan 2, 20071
-
-
SamD.Jul 1, 20063ummm, i turned this movie off. i started watching it BY CHOICE and i really wanted to see it, but it was just bad. i liked the wife character, but that was it.
-
-
GregA.Apr 25, 20061The only good thing about this movie was that I didn't have to pay for it, so the only damage done was wasting my time and some mild cranial bruising from beating my head against the wall.
-
-
RitaP.Jan 26, 20064Was disappointed by this especially after the royal tenebaums i was expecting a lot more from Wes Anderson.
-
-
GaborA.Dec 10, 20054Mildly amuzing throughout but not very funny. Too often wierdness and psuedo dramtic elements are used to distract from the fact that not much funny is happening.
-
-
PatC.Sep 26, 20053Interesting and original concepts keep one waiting for the story to take off. All the pieces come together, but none of them click into place. Harmless, but with chemistry between the actors prohibited during production. Not even Cate Blanchett can save this. I blame the director and editor. It should have worked.
-
-
CareySAug 20, 20050
-
-
JackS.Aug 20, 20051This movie was absolutely horrible. On the back cover of the DVD a guy named Glenn Kenny with Premiere gives it 4 stars, and a guy named Richard Schickel of Time says it's the "Best Comedy of the Year". I will NEVER trust a review by either of them. I think I managed one slight barely audible chuckle throughout the film.
-
-
JimM.Jul 24, 20050One of the worst movies I've ever seen in my life! What drugs were those critics on??? A waste of the four dollars spend to rent this bad bad bad turkey.
-
-
JamieG.Jul 13, 20051Painfully awful. As a huge Bill Murray fan, I kept waiting for something funny to laugh at, and yet, it never materialized. Some will say, "You just don't get it." Well, there was nothing to get...just a horrible disaster of a movie.
-
-
GeraldT.Jul 9, 20052A movie with no place important to go and too much time to get there. A few smiles but way too cute and hip. Could not force myself to finish this idiotic, drone.
-
-
ronc.Jul 3, 20052Very poor! Not funny!
-
-
RicoD.May 17, 20051Wes Anderson movies just keep getting worse and worse. Even all the quirky star power doesn't save this disaster. My advice: skip this and see Rushmore again.
-
-
LeeW.Mar 1, 20050
-
-
VinceH.Feb 28, 20054
-
-
EricH.Feb 18, 20051The kind of movie that makes you just plain "PISSED" after you struggle to stay awake to finally realize you've completely wasted 2hrs of your life.
-
-
rodp.Feb 16, 20050
-
-
KarenW.Feb 10, 20050A total waste of time. Bad script, bad acting, no laughs.
-
-
SusanMFeb 1, 20052Oh. My. God. What a disappointment. I love Bill Murray, but you know what? I couldn't stand him or the film. Total waste of time and talent. This was not worth the money, nor was it worth the two hours of my precious time. Not funny. Not entertaining. Not clever. Just stupid and pointless.
-
-
MarkB.Jan 31, 20053
-
-
PeterBJan 25, 20051
-
-
ChrisPJan 19, 20051Self-consciously ironic, coldly artificial, almost completely unfunny and boring as hell. This isn't a real movie, it's like an idea of a movie. Anderson should set his sights on a fact-based story next time to get out of this arty quagmire he's mired in.
-
-
BobF.Jan 17, 20051I love Bill Murray but this is one of the five worst movies I have ever seen! It's horrible!
-
-
SWJan 12, 20054Yes, it is quirky -- but boring nonetheless.
-
-
erikaJan 10, 20053
-
-
eyestabberJan 9, 20050Wanted to stab my eye out after 20 minutes. aweful movie.
-
-
DanaGJan 9, 20053
-
-
DavidC.Jan 8, 20050
-
-
MichaelG.Jan 8, 20052'Twee' doesn't begin to describe this self-indulgent mess. Anderson doesn't know how to write comedy, but substitutes character detail and more whimsy than a bowl of radishes. The result is confused, confusing, and ultimately just lame. If it flops, will Hollywood finally wake up and smell the truth: faux hip is SO 1999....
-
-
ScottJan 8, 20050
-
-
CrashJan 6, 20053I was under the impression that comedies were supposed to make us laugh. This movie didn't. It tried to be so subtle and ironic that it just ended up not being funny or amusing.
-
-
LenS.Jan 2, 20051Boring, vacuous movie, subsisting totally on the insults and snide remarks that one character makes about other characters. The remarks are to the other person's face, and behind-the-back. Neither are funny.
-
-
RobertN.Jan 1, 20051Never have I finished watching a movie that I felt like I deserved my money back as this. This theft should be a crime.
-
-
davidsDec 31, 20042This is the most boring movie I've seen in years. My wife fell asleep. The three legged dog was the highlight.
-
-
devintDec 30, 20040Miserable movie, like watching grass grow.
-
-
DanaM.Dec 28, 20042Awful. Simply Awful. Did I say this was an awful movie? I'm very disapppointed that Bill Murray would take this script. I had high hopes after his great performance in "Lost in Translation". Very disappointing and lame.
-
-
mrsmithDec 21, 20042Quite disappointing.. Ole' Wes really made a sucky movie this time. I usually like his films.. But this reeked like crap. I wish i had 2 sets of hands to give this one 4 thumbs down.
-
-
RadioLadyDec 10, 20043
-
-
80Wonderfully weird and wistful adventure-comedy about a fish-out-of-water oceanographer.
-
50The effect is often soporific.
-
60Murray is always pleasurable company, and his barely suppressed soulfulness might've supported this dawdling big-fish story if its insistent larkiness had abated and let a little reality in, as had "Rushmore."