User Score
8.9 out of 10

Universal acclaim- based on 1513 Ratings

User score distribution:

Review this movie

  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling
  1. FreidaL.
    Jan 8, 2004
    3
    Not my cup of tea either. The battle scenes seemed to never end and were totally predictable. Too much FX to suit me. The acting was at best passable.
  2. JasonA.
    Feb 10, 2004
    3
    It's big and at times visually thrilling, but even the CGI has moments of uncertainty. People seem to be blinded by the films size- anyone who really knows films should know that they get a lot better than this...
  3. RogerK.
    Feb 11, 2004
    3
    Not impressed at all. Too busy and long.
  4. ArthurF.
    Feb 18, 2004
    4
    I could take it or leave it. Not deserving of the raves it received.
  5. SusanA.
    Feb 19, 2004
    3
    Way overrated. Below average.
  6. Serena
    Feb 6, 2004
    0
    11 Oscars? It should've been 11 Razzies especially in the acting department.
  7. brandonb
    Mar 27, 2004
    3
    i enjoyed the previous two but as i was watching ROTK, i started to ask questions like what is the eye going to do with a ring?, or if it was forged from the other rings, then why it it better than the other rings? it's a fake!, and lastly, why diddnt they go to the ghosts sooner? it would have saved everyone a whole lot of work and agony since the ghosts killed ALL the bad guys in 5 minutes without casualty. someone please explain these things and maybe i'll reconsider. maybe i wasnt paying attention, maybe im thinking too much, or maybe i should read the books. till then, this movie definetely doesn't deserve 11 oscars and it definetely won't get a 10. it was long, cheesy, and dissapointing. Expand
  8. DitchDiggerno
    Mar 9, 2005
    1
    This movie is horrible. To those who gave this film a 10, ah hell even a 5 or better, you need mental help! It is too long, pertictable, unoriginal, and yawns a'plently.
  9. D.B.
    Feb 5, 2006
    3
    Boring, melodramatic, laughably cheesy at the end. And "The Days of our Lives" has more believable, authentic acting. When there are so many interesting things to watch, why spend (a ton of) your time watching this? It's proof that movie critics have become so jaded that they are only impressed by size, glitz, and visual grandeur ("Oooh! Look at the big mountain!). That's the only way I can explain the outpouring of praise for this mediocre, boring, self-absorbed, self-indulgent piece of second rate epic tripe. My precious? Not in the least. Expand
  10. Stefan
    Mar 5, 2006
    4
    A magnificent fantasy film, but I can't bear to watch it. Jackson invents unnecessary scenes which makes it apparent that he hasn't understood the original story, or deemed it more important to cater for his own visual and dramaturgical interests. This is ok when it comes to King Kong, but Tolkien's book has a much different, and imho superior quality of atmosphere: more wise, more witty and more... magnificent. Expand
  11. JacksonG.
    Jan 4, 2007
    3
    Although it does have some gems, overall I'm glad that the trilogy is FINALLY OVER!!! I felt all three of them were incomparably boring.
  12. JoeC.
    Dec 10, 2003
    0
    Boooring crap. Better than TTT, but not as good as FOTR.
  13. SammyK.
    Dec 10, 2003
    0
    How is this movie getting such good reviews. It was absolutely awful and extremely tedious.
  14. J
    Dec 12, 2003
    0
    All of these movies are no good at all! It's just one gigantic battle scene, that is boring after about 1 minute. Everything is too weird with all these hobbits and dwarves and wizards and magical people that don't exist. All of this is too fake and I can't believe that so many people love these worthless movies so much. How can you sit through 3 straight hours of junk like that? Expand
  15. bw
    Dec 16, 2003
    0
    this movie was pathetic, why would gandalf get his head cut off. in the book, aragorn never died...but in the movie, that damn arwen chick shot him! gimli's legs got chopped off by legolas, and then legolas died of old age! saruman died from drug overdose, and frodo and sam were too high to throw the ring in the fire! gollum committed suicide after the movie, and the ring was made of see through plastic! stupid stupid movie Expand
  16. BrianK.
    Dec 18, 2003
    2
    The movie is way too boring. I almost fell asleep. I mean, seriously, the movie could have ended sooner but they have to draw it out.
  17. SweetAngel
    Dec 19, 2003
    0
    So boring!
  18. JudeT.
    Dec 30, 2003
    3
    A well-made movie, i suppose, but -- except for the battle scenes -- a thoroughly boring movie. Hokey dialogue, syruppy music (in the slow scenes), bad bad acting (especially Elijah Wood, Liv Tyler and Cate Blanchett and that guy from the Matrix). The New Zealand scenery really adds to the grandeur Jackson was trying to depict. The problem these days with really appreciating an "epic" movie is the computer generated visuals dampen the whole epic feel. Sure, there are some four-hundred thousand Orcs (or whatever) gathered in a big field, but it's only cut and pasted there. The FX are still getting in the way of effectively getting into the world of movie storytelling. Expand
  19. TeddyB.
    Jan 14, 2004
    1
    Is it over yet? Sorry, but it did not move me at all. Overrated terribly.
  20. DetroitConnection
    Jan 16, 2004
    2
    Perhaps I am in the minority here but this flick was too over the top for me. I do not understand how everyone thinks this is the second coming of Gone With The Wind. Plain and simple I found parts of it boring with poor acting and directing. Overrated.
  21. TinaL.
    Jan 17, 2004
    0
    The fact is the film doesn't deserve this rating. But it does deserve it because it is that overrated. I went in expecting the second coming of christ. What I got was an average action adventure.
  22. DianeP.
    Jan 25, 2004
    3
    Sorry Annette, we must have been watching two different versions of the same movie. I found it flawed and way too long. Way overrated in my book. To call this the best movie of all time does a great disservice to the all time classics. To be perfectly honest, I thought it was below average and thus the 3 rating.
  23. PollyJ.
    Jan 28, 2004
    4
    As far as I'm concerned this overrated turkey got 11 Oscar nominations too many. Can't understand all the hoopla? It was just okay but nothing spectacular.
  24. MistressMalevolent
    Jan 31, 2004
    0
    Seriously, save your money and time!
  25. CarolAnnC.
    Jan 31, 2004
    3
    Just didn't do it for me.
  26. LeighC.
    Jan 7, 2004
    1
    This film is too long compared to the other two and the ending dragged on and on. The last 30 minutes or so could've been summed up in a voice-over epilogue like the way Fellowship of the Ring began.
  27. TammyD.
    Feb 13, 2004
    2
    Finally got around to watching LOR. I expected much more from a film that is expected to win every major award? Terribly disappointing as far as I am concerned. About an hour too long and just over the top to suit my taste. However, I can see that the majority of you compare this to Gone With The Wind? C'mon be serious.
  28. DeloresH.
    Feb 15, 2004
    0
    Already, some critics are backpeddling and claiming that the Oscar for Best Picture this year should go to Mystic River. I think that this film was overrated, and rode on massive hype and hysteria by its fanatics to a lot of critics awards and 11 Oscar nominations. But I think (I hope) that's as far as the hype and hysteria will take it. If you scratch the surface, all you're left with is an empty visual effects portrait. Expand
  29. Tina
    Feb 4, 2004
    0
    Arrogant and egotistic.
  30. JimL.
    Mar 10, 2004
    2
    Derivative, no characterisation, maudlin, and why did gollum look like a rubber version of ET ?
Metascore

Universal acclaim - based on 41 Critics

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 40 out of 41
  2. Negative: 0 out of 41
  1. The conclusion of Peter Jackson's masterwork is passionate and literate, detailed and expansive, and it's conceived with a risk-taking flair for old-fashioned movie magic at its most precious.
  2. Reviewed by: David Hunter
    100
    An epic success and a history-making production that finishes with a masterfully entertaining final installment.
  3. Reviewed by: David Ansen
    100
    The second installment was better than the first, and this one is best of all. It has spectacular action scenes and imaginary creatures, and it’s by far the most moving chapter. The performances have deepened.