Metascore
44 out of 100

Mixed or average reviews - based on 32 Critics

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 6 out of 32
  2. Negative: 8 out of 32
  1. 88
    The movie gets the job done, and the actors show a lot of confidence in occupying that tricky middle ground between controlled satire and comic overkill. It's fun.
  2. 67
    A breezy, dumb and lightweight film that has the benefit of not trying terribly hard to be about much of anything and succeeding (bravo?).
  3. 63
    As an action fix to hold you before the summer explosions start, you could do worse than The Losers. It's no more than an efficient time-killer.
  4. The movie is ALL revenge, all the time
  5. 63
    Still, for those who feel that too few movies these days offer the pure bliss of a testosterone overload, The Losers provides an antidote.
  6. 63
    The movie is a stupid, over-the-top comic-booky action picture with the occasional cheesy effect, oddball casting and an utterly predictable get-that-guy-before-he-gets-us plot, but Evans and a couple of his mates make it passable entertainment.
  7. Reviewed by: James White
    60
    Lithe, bold, often funny and full of characters to cheer for, it never pretends to be anything more than a trigger-happy romp. If that's what you're after, The Losers offers plenty of explosive entertainment.
  8. The Losers not only looks like a low rent, buttoned-down version of The A-Team, but it also resembles a hybrid of other flicks like "Mission: Impossible" and "Inglourious Basterds."
  9. Reviewed by: Gene Seymour
    60
    Don't ask for much, and your expectations will be met. Why invest anything as extraneous or irrelevant as "thought" into such a transaction?
  10. Reviewed by: Peter Debruge
    60
    The Losers is the sort of pyro-heavy exercise parodied in "Tropic Thunder," and no amount of production polish can hide the hollowness beneath its junk-food high.
  11. Basically, it's "The A-Team" meets "Rambo" meets "Mission: Impossible," with a mission that's one part trickiness, four parts blowing stuff up.
  12. The film never is boring, but it's never engaging, either, because its heroes hit every target in sight, while the villains, despite holstering much greater weaponry, never hit anybody. So forget about suspense.
  13. The script is boilerplate, the wit pretty much witless.
  14. Reviewed by: Claudia Puig
    50
    Though they have plenty of lethal weapons at their disposal, the Losers are nowhere near as fun as the '80s action-flick heroes they emulate.
  15. The first dumb-fun action movie of the summer season has arrived early with The Losers, a loud, loving homage to guns and testosterone based on a series of comic books about a renegade band of CIA operatives. How dumb is it? You might actually kill a few million brain cells just watching it.
  16. 50
    The amusement it provides is cheap, disposable, and hardly worth the number of quarters you fed into the slot in a frenzy not to go home empty-handed.
  17. Providing expectations are kept low, there's some fun to be had in the elaborately preposterous action set-pieces, and especially Jason Patric's campy performance as the movie's villain.
  18. The Losers does a perfectly serviceable job of achieving its low ambitions.
  19. 50
    It's not rocket science making nonstop action feel semi-fresh, and The Losers' script by Peter Berg and James Vanderbilt manages to render each individual, um, a loser in the broadest and most memorable strokes. It's not a masterpiece, either, but it'll do until Hannibal, Murdock, and the rest the A-gamers start blowing things up come June.
  20. 50
    Without previous knowledge of Andy Diggle's comics, The Losers looks like every other globetrotting gunpowder flick in which good guy bullets never miss and bad guy bullets never hit their targets.
  21. There are enough clever bits, in that exploding-bodies kind of way, to inject some fun into the party. White and director of photography Scott Kevan, who collaborated on "Stomp the Yard," have some seriously inventive visuals, which at times are smash-cut fabulous.
  22. About the only thing that distinguishes this iteration from those of yore is that the violence is more explicit, the edits are faster, and no one has a stogie stuck in his kisser.
  23. 50
    As the bad guy, Jason Patric gets the funniest lines, but there are plenty to go around; though rigidly formulaic the movie is undeniably good-humored, if you don't count all those minor characters getting shot in the face.
  24. The Losers is the ultimate example, scraped from the bottom of the comic-book barrel, where writer Andy Diggle's figurine-like characters first had their exploits in an exciting War on Terror.
  25. Whether you're betting on action or laughs, this is a lose-lose scenario.
  26. Reviewed by: Dan Kois
    30
    A busy, unsatisfying comic thriller, poorly acted by a grab bag of new faces and franchise movie refugees, and set to a hard-rock soundtrack.
  27. Reviewed by: John Anderson
    30
    In addition to all else, and it's a lot, The Losers wastes the riches of Hollywood technology in hot pursuit of nothing.
  28. The Losers is boring. It's predictable. It's so, so active, and yet so, so dead.
  29. 25
    Staying awake during this ordeal of incompetent, incomprehensible stupidity is not difficult. It's so noisy that you can hear it in the next town. Staying interested is something else entirely.
  30. 25
    There isn't a whiff of humility or self-deprecation to Clay, Roque, Jensen, Cougar, and Pooch, a collection of black-ops douchebags and our ostensible heroes.
  31. The Losers is simply a lot of low blows, telegraphed each and every time.
  32. 12
    This movie -- G.I. Joke, The D-Team -- tries to do so little, and yet falls so short. A clue comes when the girl asks Clay, "How's your steak?" and he replies, "Meaty." Simple enough to achieve in theory, but this would-be treat for cinematic carnivores is a sawdust sandwich.
User Score

Generally favorable reviews- based on 72 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 18 out of 24
  2. Negative: 3 out of 24
  1. 8
    Totally fun action movie. Really straddles the line between over-the-top action and satire. Sure, it's ultimately disposable entertainment-- but who says that there is anything wrong with that? Full Review »
  2. How bad this comic-strip spin-off action film from Hollywood hacks could be? At least it's not repellent, or maybe just a tad, thanks to the former rising star Jason Patric's embarrassingly frivolous interpretation of the villain ("no one remembers SPEED 2: CRUISE CONTROL 1997?â), even Keanu Reeves is ruthlessly sidelined by a younger generation, much less this would be a welcome comeback for Mr. Patric. As long as comic books are still resting comfortably in my cluelessness zone, I have no penchant to be misguided by the popularity of the original material. The film is plainly a disastrously planned revenge story by a bunch of rogue CIA op teams, an upgraded version of the ever-so-similar genre best remembered in 1980s' B-grade video market where action hunks strive for a mainstream cheque. So now a few decades has passed by, itâs frustrating to admit the gimmick in this film is way lagging behind its time. The film is also in shortage of any potential to become a cult classic, with well-conceived corny procedures, the adrenalin level is always beneath the threshold, maybe a wiser alternative is just flipping through the trailer where the marrows are all there (such as the reckless finger-shooting from a pre-Captain American Chris Evans), thus saving a great amount of glazed-over time. The over-saturated color shade is a tint of eyeball-irritating, and the cast itself doesnât seem to care too much about the film as well, maybe the only one who benefits from it is a further career-leap for Zoe Saldana, who has made a decent preparatory warm-up for her heroin formula with the likes of COLOMBIANA (2011), a black version of Angelina Jolie in the action ilk is more than just to meet the eyes, also to pitch-perfectly meet the demanding market. Full Review »
  3. There is nothing wrong with the premise of the film, despite lacking any semblance of originality. But by trying to condense so many ideas into a summer blockbuster length movie it feels rushed and disjointed. The characters are all one-dimensional and the plot doesn't even attempt to resolve itself, which is obviously to pave the way for a sequel. Nobody is expecting much in the way of authenticity with this sort of film but you want to actually feel some attachment to the main protagonists. For a film that emulates the A Team and James Bond it pales in comparison. It is the production that really lets this film down, along with the ham-handed acting of Jason Patric as the over-the-top villain. This is a disappointing blemish on the careers of some very capable actors. Full Review »