- Studio: USA Films
- Release Date: Oct 31, 2001
- Critic Score
- Most active
- Publication
- Most clicked
-
100Like all the Coens' movies, "Man" is supremely self-aware and darkly, hellishly funny. It's also brilliantly written and acted to a fare-thee-well by an outrageously good cast.
-
100Most of the way this ranks with the Coens' most immaculately crafted work. Cain would have loved its dreamlike chills, and so will audiences nostalgic for the movies of half a century ago.
-
100The Coens' plotting, with its suspense and reversals, is a source of amazement and delight.
-
100If this were not such great American-vernacular moviemaking -- hilarious yet hypnotic -- one would be tempted to see something Greek in the tragedy that Ed never comprehends.
-
100For all its long shadows and ominous atmosphere, this is a very funny movie -- as funny as the Coens' masterful "Fargo."
-
91It's an entirely conceived work of art, dark and hopeless and maybe even callous, but glittering and wonderful in its determination and in its craft.
-
90The Coens have resurrected a hardscrabble California of wooden porches and gravel driveways, of rolling, oak-wreathed hills and one-lane roads, and of a restless people whose meager dreams are wrecked the moment money, sex or a bottle get in the way. Never has the past seemed so familiar.
-
90Steadily engrossing and devilishly funny, and, o brother, does it look sharp.
-
90You could say a lot about the very satisfying The Man Who Wasn't There, but what's for sure is that no one but the deadpan, dead-on Coen brothers could have turned it out.
-
90The Coens have used the noir idiom to fashion a haunting, beautifully made movie that refers to nothing outside itself and that disperses like a vapor as soon as it's over.
-
90When you're in the hands of the Coen brothers, you're in for sheer originality.
-
88To be sure, there are goofy flourishes here, the in-jokey, left-field rummies that are the Brothers Coen's stock-in-trade. But this is altogether a quieter, more philosophical sort of endeavor.
-
83Isn't content to stick to the genre conventions it sets up. Instead, it sprawls and mutates into one of the Coens' elaborate gizmoid yarns.
-
80This fastidiously hyperreal neo-noir suggests a sadder but wiser remake of the Coens' rambunctious debut, "Blood Simple."
-
80The film is marvelous fun on its own terms -- I laughed all the way through it.
-
80The Coen brothers tread into James M. Cain territory with The Man Who Wasn't There, but with less tasty results than either Cain or the Coens themselves at their best.
-
80It's the latest and one of the best entries in a genre whose highest philosophical expression is the whiplash realization that the universe doesn't play fair.
-
78It's the best-looking film of the year, hands down, and Thornton is dazzling, a dull diamond in the gutter rough.
-
75So assured and perceptive in its style, so loving, so intensely right, that if you can receive on that frequency, the film is like a voluptuous feast.
-
75Has all the tense crackle of film noir and the molasses drip of irony that is the trademark of movie-making brothers Joel and Ethan Coen.
-
75Once you get the joke and grasp the aesthetic they're after, it's fun, and it almost works on the steam of its clever plot mechanics.
-
70What makes me respect The Man Who Wasn't There despite myself is the sense that the Coens want it to be about something that can't be described or defined.
-
Not for them the straightforward spoof, but, instead, a slightly creepy desire to have it both ways -- to inject new life into noir, but also to laugh behind their hands at its antique solemnity, and to urge us to follow suit. [5 Nov 2001, p. 105]
-
63As a whole, it's a bit of a mess, the work of bratty geniuses with talent to spare, but unsure of what -- if anything -- they're trying to say.
-
63Despite its visual brilliance, its all-round cleverness, and the way it demonstrates a profound understanding of genre, the Coen brothers' The Man Who Wasn't There doesn't quite come off.
-
63Lacks the requisite sense of dread.
-
63The juice in "Man" comes from supporting characters.
-
60Thornton seems born to play the sort of slow-witted poet of the mundane that the Coens find worthy of their condescending affection.
-
50It's clever, in a "dare you to name this hommage" kind of way, but it's fundamentally heartless and coldly hollow.
-
40tThe resulting hodgepodge is a medley of the brothers’ favorite verbal and visual tics, making much noise and signifying nothing.
-
40The Coens have a true feeling for the sleek surfaces of the genre, but they don't connect with its sordid, sexy undercurrent; that's why Crane is made to seem so passive.
-
38Isn't serious enough to fulfill its ambitions, or funny enough to compensate for its failures.
-
30Ordinary moviegoers, on the other hand, may wonder what they're supposed to feel, apart from bored.
prev
next
Page:
- 1
User score distribution:
-
Positive: 18 out of 19
-
Mixed: 1 out of 19
-
Negative: 0 out of 19
-
JayH.8