- Studio: Warner Bros. Pictures
- Release Date: May 15, 2003
User Score
6.4
out of 10
Generally favorable reviews- based on 475 Ratings
User score distribution:
-
Positive: 308 out of 475
-
Mixed: 57 out of 475
-
Negative: 110 out of 475
Review this movie
-
Your Score10 out of 10
-
Please sign in or create an account before writing a review.
-
-
Submit
-
Check Spelling
-
Characters remaining: 5000 out of 5000
- User score
- Most active
- By date
- Most helpful
- Most Clicked
-
Apr 14, 201210
-
SethH.May 14, 20039Thoroughly entertaining from start to finish, even though it loses the original's sense of achievement. More of a refinement of what was laid down in the first one. Those looking for a great "human" story should steer clear. Those looking for a great action movie will love it.
-
-
C.MybuttMay 15, 20038
-
-
MatthewS.May 30, 20037
-
-
[Anonymous]May 8, 200310This movie is going to kick ass.
-
-
LilaC.Jun 1, 20035Please...make...Revolutions...better....
-
-
YoonMinC.May 9, 20047Dumb plot but has three great action scenes. the scene on the highway is a landmark CGI martial arts stunt spectacle. mayhem turns into frenzied hightech machine musical.
-
-
ChanningS.Oct 13, 20032Awful. The Matrix was one of my favorite movies ever. This is ridiculous and lost the thread of the original completely. The party scene was insulting. The fight scenes pointless.
-
-
PierreH.Nov 7, 20035It's not as good as the first one, that's obvious. The movie is sometimes cracking under the weight of its own lack of humor, and the dialogues are often hilarious in their new-age chessiness. It's a waste of a great basic idea, and the Matrix legend would probably have been better preserved without the two following chapters.
-
-
XanderB.Oct 8, 20036Considering the fact that I didn't like the first one, this movie turned out pretty good. It is long winded but has more fun with its concept, which never added up anyway. It is still cold and devoid of compassion though.
-
-
JamesG.May 11, 200310I'm eager to see it!
-
-
JasonMay 13, 200310This has to be one of the best movies ever made. Words cannot acuratly describe the immaculate bliss that is the Matrix: Reloaded. Once you see it you'll agree!
-
-
EnneJ.May 15, 200310Fantastic movie.
-
-
FrankC.May 15, 20038
-
-
J.A.May 17, 200310Awesome movie.
-
-
DanB.May 18, 20038
-
-
MikeG.May 20, 200310I've been waiting for this movie for quite a while as so many others have and I was hoping to have fun watching it. Guess what? I did!! Thank you Wachowski Brothers! Looking forward to the next one in November!!!
-
-
FernandoC.May 20, 200310The first movie served as a springboard for this one and boy does it ever jump out and grab you! I will be corny, but what the hell, it is a masterpiece.
-
-
E.W.May 22, 200310This movie rocks!!
-
-
JackMay 25, 20039Forget the story -- this is about the stunts, the chases, the action, and it ROCKS!
-
-
M.T.May 28, 20030Pretentious, but worst of all boring. No story line, - could have been watching Total Recall for all the difference. Never once was the viewer left in suspense - you knew none of the heroes would die. Furthermore, the effect of one robot after another getting dealt to loses its effect after the 10,000 time.
-
-
KenH.May 20, 20038
-
-
BenJ.May 30, 20034I was very disappointed. This was mostly due to a plot that not only wandered in some very uninteresting directions, but that the new cast members they needed to tell it all appeared to have failed the auditions for the Star Trek series for being TOO hammy. The Matrix was a great film with or without great set pieces. The Matrix Reloaded was unfortunately only worth watching for its set pieces.
-
-
TrinityMay 30, 20030
-
-
NeomanzipJun 5, 200310This movie was the ultimate. so what if i had 2 c it 3 times to get it. this movie was kick, punch, BOOM!!! the special effects were awesome, the fighting rocked. and it had plot. this movie was better than the first, it was da bom.
-
-
TimA.Jul 16, 20034Not the movie that we had expected! Good action sequences but the story goes nowhere..
-
-
JimboMastermindJul 6, 20031
-
-
DaveC.Aug 1, 20037
-
-
TechAug 3, 20064It was okay... The first matrix film is best.
-
-
CVOct 14, 20034Very Disappointing - not near as good as the original.
-
-
DhirenM.Oct 14, 20039Intellectually stimulating, great action definitely lived up to the original, although some scenes where unnecessary still was enthralling to watch throughout.
-
-
ElliottNov 6, 20034
-
-
RickS.Oct 16, 20033
-
-
ChrisS.Oct 28, 200310Come on people, the futuristic feel, action and Monica Belluci make this a great movie. Dont take it seriously, just enjoy it.
-
-
WhatIsGilbertMulroneycakes?Oct 31, 20038
-
-
PatC.Oct 30, 20033I'm sorry. A movie should never raise philosophical questions it can't offer an answer for. The first movie didn't go beyond its own insights, so in a mind-bending way it made sense. "Reloaded" is a mind breaker, and confusion is not usually regarded as an entertaining quality.
-
-
JamesG.May 11, 200310I'm eager to see it!
-
-
TomM.May 12, 20039It really is the real deal. Yet if you see it more than once, you really grasp what the filmmakers were trying to accomplish, and it pushes your mind far and beyond what the first (excellent) film did.
-
-
StefanxmenMay 13, 200310Within the first 3 minutes of the movie there is everything that made M1 a MUST SEE. And after that you will wake up (like Neo) and enjoy the rest! I like the architect scene and some races and fights are still unbelieveable. I am EAGER to see M3!!!
-
-
PaulM.May 13, 20037How can people give this movie 10/10 when they haven't even seen it? IDIOTS! Anyway, it was good... but something was missing. Not sure what, but it just didn't "feel" dark enough...
-
-
NeoMay 14, 200310I can say that this film is better than Citizen Kane in every way. It is surely the greatest film ever made on this planet. A bible story of the new millenium!
-
-
HulkaMukaMay 14, 20037Good flick. Fun to watch.
-
-
CrotC.May 14, 20038Awesome effects.
-
-
FoxStarMay 15, 20031
-
-
HåkanS.May 15, 20035The movie wasn't even near as good as "The Matrix". It was a huge dissappointment for me. I'll give it a five for good effects and "cool" action. There was nothing more to see in it, though.
-
-
PlatoTheGreekMay 15, 20033
-
-
JoshuaW.May 15, 20039
-
-
BelleS.May 15, 20030Loud and pointless movie. Dumb action and loaded with annoying philosophy.
-
-
CalebC.May 15, 20039
-
-
DanMay 16, 200310It is very easy to miss much of the story. If you gave it a bad score because of the story, it's quite possible you just didn't understand it. Amazing movie.
-
-
JamesA.May 16, 20034
-
-
BillMay 16, 20039A kick-ass summer popcorn flick. Don't miss it.
-
-
TheoV.May 16, 20039Not as good as the first, but it was still very well done and it advanced the Matrix chronicles very well. The special effects were absolutely amazing and made up for the way the movie had a little too much Hollywood compared to the last.
-
-
EdwardR.May 16, 20033Bloated, pretensous, repetetive--what happened?? Other than a couple of cool scenes (that go on too long), a huge letdown and waste of time.
-
-
ZhouRenAoMay 17, 20036Too much directionless talk. Frigteningly old looking female stars, no sex appeal. Uninspired.
-
-
KentP.May 17, 20032
-
-
MichaelP.May 17, 200310Finally another movie that combines sci-fi, action and intelligence. So many Sci-fi movies lack depth that is it so nice to see one that has so many degrees of intellectual depth in the story.
-
-
PeterB.May 18, 200310I don't know what the bad reviews are about, but if you enjoyed the first Matrix, you will totally enjoy Matrix Reloaded. I saw it last night and I liked it even better than the first!
-
-
JohnQ.DisappointedMay 18, 20032
-
-
SammyJ.May 19, 20034Matrix Reloaded is both good and original. Sadly, the part that is good is not original and the part that is original is not good.
-
-
WolfieMay 19, 200310Wow, so many low scores...i can hardly believe it. the world is a mixture of minds, that's for sure. i am sorry, strangers, that so few of you enjoyed the movie...i absolutely love it, myself. i find it a beautiful story. i was amazed. so, everyone's different, and no one is right.
-
-
DanoMay 21, 200310
-
-
WAKOJAKOMay 20, 20030What a clunker of a movie. The first hour put me to sleep and the second is so relentlessly stupid I almost walked out of the theater. And by the time you get to the ending, which isn't, I could not care less what the third film has to add. Studpid, boring, and horribly acted. And the special effects ain't all that, either.
-
-
Jeffrey(L.)S.May 22, 20036(**1/2-out of 4) 1stly I'm not a fan of sci-fi, but this sequel has some of the most astonishinglly done visuals to date! Especially on freeway scene. Hard to fathom this is same guy> Reeves, from "Bill & Ted," days? In my book quite stronger than 1st. OSCAR race for Visuals this yr. will have some comp. "T3"/"The Hulk" & "LOR-ROTK," of course! But which "Matrix," will they pick?
-
-
AutumnTacticsMay 23, 20031
-
-
NealC.May 26, 20038
-
-
SweetkMay 27, 200310Great Movie. I love people bitching how it didn't explain enough, too many empty turns and not enough revealed for them to understand it. Maybe, that's the point of the middle movie in a trilogy jackasses? I see real movie reviewers complaining about the same things a 12 year old would. Wise up knuckleheads and watch the movie for what it is, the "middle" movie.
-
-
RevChrisMay 28, 20036
-
-
TrinityK.May 29, 200310
-
-
Flom.May 30, 20038Quite enjoyable. A few scenes lasted too long for my taste (party in Zion, fight against agent SmithX100...) but it's a great story in addition to the action. Has to be seen in a theater, not on TV.
-
-
ScottN.May 30, 20038The Matrix Reloaded was not as good as its predecessor. Sure, the visuals were more technologically and visually stunning, but I figure that with the first Matrix less is more. Especially considering that Neo looks like a doll. Of course, if you're an avid fan you don't care about the simple flaws that the movie shows and just get obsorbed in the psycho-babble plot. I did.
-
-
TyS.Jun 10, 20030Cant believe i parted with my money to see this rubbish when my instincts were telling me it was going to be rubbish.
-
-
SteveW.Jun 10, 20039
-
-
RimirJun 13, 20030
-
-
S.R.Jun 16, 20036
-
-
AnonymousguyJun 1, 20034
-
-
KrisH.Jun 18, 20039It's a pretty good film fishburne is very overweight and very tonk.
-
-
SamWJun 18, 200310A masterpiece!
-
-
SammieS.Jun 20, 20032
-
-
SammieS.Jun 20, 20033
-
-
ElectricMonkJun 20, 200310Perfect.
-
-
DarrenH.Jun 2, 200310
-
-
JohnP.Jun 23, 20032
-
-
DerekW.Jun 23, 20035
-
-
VincenzoC.Jun 24, 20036Take away the sex and dance scenes and it would be one step behind the original, not one mile.
-
-
NickV.Jun 20, 200310This is a great movie. I have seen alot of movies and this is on my top ten with the original characters from the first one and some new important characters that fall right into place. This movie is just as good as the first one and is a definite must see.
-
-
MallisaL.Jun 6, 20032
-
-
Monsta666Jun 9, 20038
-
-
MonicaB.Jun 9, 20035WOW. Some of you guys are telling me this movie is "pure beauty". Are you telling me that I need to think of Zion as "pure beauty"?! Give me the blue pill. NOW.
-
-
FantasyJun 9, 20030Pure Crapola.
-
-
LizaB.Jul 16, 20032
-
-
ApocaraphexJul 17, 20038No one reads these, why share your opinions, if someone does read it they won't listen to someones opinion they dont know. is it merely trying to show your hate for the movie or trying to get in the crowd......the world may never know.
-
-
SarahB.Jul 18, 20033Yo, Brian C., I understood the plot entirely (I read Darren H.'s review, good stuff) and I agree it was very complex and cool, but there were more things I was complaining about and it was NOT just the sex. If you want to see what I oh-so-hated about the film, read Derek W.'s review because I totally agreed with him.
-
-
DisappointedJul 2, 20031
-
-
JamieW.Jul 26, 200310The Wachowski Brothers have put together one of the best movies ever (hopefully one of the best until November), and many people don't seem to realise the complexity and sheer imaginative brilliance of a film like this. On of the best films I have seen. I agree on many levels with Brian C. - a person who knows what they're on about.
-
-
SeanJul 2, 20033Ok, first this movie was garbage. The acting was really bad. The plot was pretty much non-existent, and the action scenes(except the drawn-out highway scene) were pretty lame. I was never more bored at a movie ever. Revolutions better be a whole hell of a lot better otherwise this may be one of the worst trilogies ever. The first was good but not great.
-
-
BritG.Jul 31, 20033Crap crap crap, they tried to hard, all it needed was controllers, just plain ol stupid!!!! but meh the first ones amazing so 3 outta 10.
-
-
FantasyJul 4, 20030Extremely disappointing sequel to a very good original. Another example of making money without putting much effort in. Avoid at all costs.
-
-
Jayj.Jul 4, 20034Very dissapointed, expected so much more, especially for the sequel. It had a lot to live up to, and it didnt even compare in the least. I would have given it a lower score but im gonna cut it some flack, if and only if its building up to a great third installment that and the highway scene. but all in all it really sucked.
-
-
PaulD.Aug 1, 20039What can say? This film is one hell of a trip. fantastic FX and a better script then the last film. The brothers sure have gone to work on this. The only downside is that its lost some of the charm of the first film. It no-longer feels like your tumbeling down the rabbit hole. All in all, A fantastic film not to be missed.
-
-
75If The Matrix Reloaded is a trip through high-toned mediocrity, not nearly as suggestive or cohesive as ''The Matrix,'' it's one of the most wizardly mediocre movies I've seen in quite some time.
-
63Inevitably, the one ingredient that does remain constant are the performances -- once again, there aren't any (the lone exception is Gloria Foster's mommy Oracle, although, even here, the shine is off the joke). Of course, for the hyperactive principals, this gig isn't about acting -- it's about athleticism, which suits Keanu Reeves's talents just fine.
-
80The Wachowskis still hold the current franchise on intellectually engaging action films. It's not like I won't be heading back for a second (or even third) look.