- Studio: Warner Bros. Pictures
- Release Date: Nov 5, 2003
User Score
5.5
out of 10
Mixed or average reviews- based on 328 Ratings
User score distribution:
-
Positive: 174 out of 328
-
Mixed: 51 out of 328
-
Negative: 103 out of 328
Review this movie
-
Your Score10 out of 10
-
Please sign in or create an account before writing a review.
-
-
Submit
-
Check Spelling
-
Characters remaining: 5000 out of 5000
- User score
- Most active
- By date
- Most helpful
- Most Clicked
-
JMillerNov 13, 20040This movie was so bad, it reverberated back onto The Matrix and The Matrix Revolutions and utterly ruined them.
-
-
PatC.Jun 1, 20043
-
-
Yay.Mar 6, 20041And the Matrix series concludes with a resounding fart.
-
-
MelissaM.Apr 10, 20042Very disappointing. Such a poor conclusion to such a great beginning. Bad. Bad. Bad.
-
-
BryApr 9, 20040
-
-
PhilT.May 17, 20053I was let down by this movie. Big time. The battle in Zion was a minor high point for me, but the sopping-wet slugfest between Neo and Smith felt like a hollow, pointless event - they're both invinicble, so what's the point? oh, wait, that Smith guy's not invincible, he got beaten by the little old lady within... come on.
-
-
Jun 6, 20113Should never have been made. The original was really fun, but all that cam after are crap... just plain crap. What else can you say.... watch The Matrix, forget the rest!
-
Mr.WigglesJan 4, 20040
-
-
KeanesA.Feb 3, 200410
-
-
StarfoxNov 10, 20035
-
-
C.MeyerNov 13, 20037I thought this was a great finish to the trilogy and i dont know why the reviews were so poorly given. maybe b/c of the standard the first set. but the action, emotion, and excitement of the 3rd film was fine by me!
-
-
AshleyK.Nov 4, 20035Definitely a great movie!!! I cried through the whole thing. It really makes you think about life and what it should be about!
-
-
PrincessTruNov 5, 20036As usual, the special effects are mesmerizing...too bad the plot and acting weren't up to par. Leaves way too many questions unanswered and an all-together unfulfilling ending to what could have been an outstanding trilogy.
-
-
ROHITG.Nov 6, 20039
-
-
NielsS.Nov 6, 20038
-
-
DesmondP.Nov 8, 20037I'm still a die hard fan but was very disappointed with the ending as it leaves too many unanswered questions.
-
-
CameronS.Mar 1, 20047Its a good film, better than the second, but theres too much cgi in it and the ending is crap and tells us nothing. Should have left it at just one film, as that is one of the best films ever.
-
-
KevinH.Apr 10, 20045I thought the movie was just fine. They ended it well but not the best they could. It was a good trilogy. As for the best trilogy in movie history, no. But as for a good set of movies in our time - not bad at all.
-
-
AkhilK.Apr 5, 200410No doubt, the best trilogy...ever. And i mean..ever. Not even Lord of the Rings with its action scenes and what have you can compete with the intensity and excitement the Matrix Revolutions has delivered.
-
-
[Anonymous]Apr 8, 20044Wicked CGI...and that's about it. I would've payed the $3.50 to rent just the battle scene.
-
-
TheMulroneycakesRevelationsJan 26, 20066
-
-
JoeNov 11, 20032
-
-
SamK.Nov 15, 20030Sucked big time.
-
-
NoelT.Nov 10, 20035
-
-
TheTwoNov 20, 20039
-
-
LesE.Nov 30, 20036
-
-
MeH.Nov 5, 20030It was a super disappointment.
-
-
M.R.Nov 5, 20032
-
-
AnthonyB.Nov 5, 20035what an awesome kick ass movie that is so freakin great until the end. I gotta say that it has to be one of the worst endings ever. It's like the greatest rollecoaster ride ever until it flies off the tracks and crashes into the ground! What a disappointment.
-
-
MichaelL.Nov 6, 20034
-
-
LennyT.Nov 6, 200310Admit it! Those who hate this movie do not understand it. The rabbit hole is just too deep for them.
-
-
ElliottNov 6, 20038
-
-
HMNov 6, 20038Great movie, a few minor flaws, very enjoyable overall.
-
-
CharlesD.Nov 6, 200310What happens with the critics...enjoy the best ride of the history..the rest..forget it.
-
-
VotslovJ.Nov 6, 20030
-
-
PeteE.Nov 6, 20039
-
-
JordanC.Nov 6, 200310This movie is f... awsome. It has the best special effects in any movie ever, the best fight scenes ever and you will never guess the ending. Everything makes perfect sense in this movie too, some of the minor details you will have to do a little bit of deep thinking or guessing though.
-
-
KenC.Nov 6, 20038Great Fun. Forget the PC crap. A good 90 minutes of queer entertainment.
-
-
DeanR.Nov 7, 20030What a piece of sh.t and waste of money. What every happened to the great cinematic style and storytelling that made the first movie famous? The movie series is trying to hard to be complicated with it's psycho-babble and riddles... Nothing is truly answered and the movie doesn't really end and your like "Yeah finally this crap is over."
-
-
BingoBongoNov 7, 20031
-
-
JoshNov 7, 20038Yeah, Reloaded had more action, BUT IT ALL LOOKED FAKE! In fact, despite the awesomeness of the highway scene, much of it was so obviously computerized, that it seemed more like a video game. Revolutions looks far better than Reloaded and it's more coherent. Reloaded is probably the most disjointed film I have ever seen. In short, Reloaded sucked. Revolutions sucks you in. I loved it.
-
-
JoelC.Nov 7, 20037
-
-
SteveF.Nov 8, 20039The ending? Incredible. Why? Read Thus Spoke Zarathustra by Freidrich Nieztsche, and then it'll make perfect sense- it was brilliant. The dialogue throughout was less than great, but I think there was less pseudo-religious BS and that the action was both more purposeful and more glorious.
-
-
DavetheWaveNov 8, 20034Stuck in the train station blah blah blah leather bar blah blah blah love love love BraveMech blah blah blah Cornell West cameo blah blah blah help I'm blind yet can see blah blah blah Trinity why's that rebar stuck in your chest love love love blah blah blah Mr. Anderson and elf king fight blah blah blah a new day has dawned tedious tedious tedious.
-
-
RicardoH.Nov 8, 20036There are many that think this movie is "kewl' because it still alludes to philosophy and such. But they miss the point: the delivery AS A FILM was just bad. Bad acting, bad pacing, bad scripting. That takes away what the philosophy aspect could have done well. I won't fault the action/visuals, but without the other half, the Matrix series loses so much. - Raist
-
-
DWP102589Nov 8, 200310This movie flat out ROCKS. It's better than the first two put together, which I would have thought was IMPOSSIPLE.
-
-
KatieP.Dec 22, 20038Having not seen the first one, I have to say that I was entertained throughout. Keanu Reeves is a terrible actor, however.
-
-
AdamE.Dec 2, 20036
-
-
Orion4600Jan 25, 20042
-
-
AndrewT.Feb 12, 20044
-
-
ColmMar 3, 20041Dude, what can I say, Keanu clearly needed money to make yet another Bill and Ted adventure.
-
-
M.K.Apr 11, 20049
-
-
GregA.Apr 13, 20048I watched this on DVD instead of the cimema after not being too impressed with reloaded. However, I was surprised. This is a great film because it has a lot more action and actually finishes off beautifully. I found the visuals (props, models and computer graphics) fantastic and the whole atmosphere of Zion under siege worked a treat.
-
-
JennyS.Aug 20, 20040
-
-
DavidA.Jun 20, 20059It's a cool movie wich I really enyoyed, the cool thing is the DVD extras in which it shows you how they did the special effects.
-
-
ManfredP.May 1, 200610
-
-
ErwinK.May 4, 20060
-
-
JBAug 12, 20063
-
-
JoeyK.Mar 19, 20071
-
-
StarfoxNov 10, 20035
-
-
MartyZ.Nov 10, 20030Mr Reeves is riveting, as long as you don't have to look in to his eyes finally a geandre Keanu can wrap his talentless behind around. Other than that utter tripe.
-
-
MikeG.Nov 10, 200310
-
-
BonnieD.Nov 12, 20030Oh my God was this terrible. Don't waste your time or money. You have been warned.
-
-
dmccNov 14, 20039
-
-
SatisfiedViewerNov 14, 200310
-
-
QBeingNov 17, 20039This Movie was AWESOME!!! OK So its not best Picture material, but who cares. the film rocked from beginning to end and they answer most if not all of the questions left open from the previosu flick. then pose a few more. I will see this film at least one more time, adn prbalay a few more times after that!
-
-
SanzenNov 17, 20038
-
-
SiW.Nov 19, 20032
-
-
StuN.Nov 10, 20039Revolutions couldn`t reach the level of the first Matrix but yet it is a great movie . Its better than Reloaded and answers the questions of the trilogy ... well you got to dig deeper and deeper and watch the movie several times to understand it ! You got to think over it ... and find the answers .For those who will watch the movie for the action...well you wont be disappointed
-
-
CraigS.Nov 21, 20031
-
-
JasonNov 5, 20031
-
-
EraserNov 5, 20038
-
-
JonathanM.Nov 5, 20035
-
-
Jonnyl.Nov 5, 20039
-
-
ChrisM.Nov 5, 200310Not a huge fan of the matrix trilogy but went with a friend who's a huge fan and we both agreed that this movie kicked ass!!!
-
-
GeoffL.Nov 5, 20031
-
-
JoeBlowNov 5, 20038
-
-
JohnY.Nov 5, 20039
-
-
JohnY.Nov 5, 20039
-
-
BitBurnNov 5, 20037Certainly not the best film ever, but I think lots of us came to the theatre expecting more than Reloaded, but not the first Matrix. Between all the cliché dialogs and spectacular special effects, there are enough surprises to keep your head up high on the screen and be happy spending that $10 to see it!
-
-
BenA.Nov 5, 20034
-
-
NazNov 5, 20035
-
-
MacM.Nov 5, 20037More "whoah did you see that?!" and more "ummmm....did you understand that?!?!".
-
-
K.I.Nov 5, 20034I expected the philosophical quandry posed by Reloaded to culminate in some sort of climatic realization by the audience in what could have been the best trilogy of all time. However, I left the theater feeling dissapointed and ripped off by the fact that Revolutions is nothing short of CGI gone crazy. I rate the movie 4 for the action, otherwise I would have given it a 0.
-
-
EricNov 5, 20030
-
-
K.H.Nov 5, 20038If you remember that there are no answers to the philosohical questions the earlier chapters posed, its actually an outstanding action flick!
-
-
GeorgeR.Nov 6, 20038Great, great movie. It was deep and poignant. But Michael L. does have a point about the whole sunlight thing. The ending could've been a bit better, but that's it. The movie deals with change and acceptance in a very deep way. I think it was fantastic. I'm sorry for those who don't get it. Enjoy the ride.
-
-
FrankL.Nov 6, 20032
-
-
J.D.Nov 6, 20036Wait for the dvd.
-
-
TomS.Nov 6, 20039
-
-
B.B.Nov 6, 20030
-
-
JonS.Nov 6, 20030
-
-
RobertNov 6, 20032Some of the fight scenes were entertaining, but the plot was confusing and incomprehensible at points. Overall, a very disappointing end to a trilogy that started so well.
-
-
WalkenFanNov 6, 20030Would have been better if Christopher Walken was cast as Neo.
-
-
JinC.Nov 6, 20037
-
-
JoshuaW.Nov 6, 20037
-
-
RyanM.Nov 6, 20035"Revolutions" fails as a sequel everywhere "Reloaded" blossomed. It's a confusing, dark, boring, careless, sloppy sci-fi finale. In other words: it's a mess.
-
-
BippityBobbityNov 7, 20038Smart, funnyish, pretty. Parts missing, but fewer than *Reloaded*. I look forward to: THE MATRIX: REBOOT when the machines resurrect Neo and Trinity to fight a resurgent Agent Smith.
-
-
AlanD.Nov 7, 20039
-
-
GlowingRabbitNov 7, 200310
-
-
60Everything about the sequel feels bloated.
-
60Ending with neither a bang nor a whimper, the finale falls somewhere in between. It's an improvement over its concurrently shot, babbling predecessor, but it ultimately fails to capture any of that jaw-dropping sense of exhilaration that made the original such a must-see event.
-
70Though theyre full of undeniably spectacular moments, great production values and unusual ambition, a simple thing has gotten lost in these sequels: theyre not much fun.