Metascore
49 out of 100

Mixed or average reviews - based on 16 Critics

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 7 out of 16
  2. Negative: 4 out of 16
  1. In directing The Monkey's Mask from Annie Kennedy's adaptation of Dorothy Porter's novel-in-poetry, Samantha Lang displays considerable style and assurance, with Porter and McGillis giving beautifully nuanced portrayals.
  2. Think "Basic Instinct" with brains, and you've got it.
  3. 80
    What makes the film compelling is the filmmakers' ability to blend a studied (occasionally academic) dissection of cultural and sexual decadence with a potboiler plot.
  4. Reviewed by: Jay Carr
    75
    Less elliptical and more down-and-dirty than Lang's interesting debut film, ''The Well,'' this one tumbles through Sydney's academic and alternative poetry circles and is built around a lesbian private eye.
  5. Reviewed by: Todd McCarthy
    70
    Builds and sustains considerable interest through its unexpected characterizations, unusual milieu and atmospheric style.
  6. It isn't quite like watching a train wreck -- it's more perverse and anti-climactic -- but it's as hard to shake once it's passed.
  7. Kelly McGillis quite literally as you've never seen her -- as a manipulative, icy sex goddess in whose bedroom there are no limits.
  8. 60
    Makes for compulsive viewing.
  9. 50
    It is awkward and dull, a capital crime for an aspiring noir.
  10. 50
    McGillis, though, is the film's worst enemy. Her wooden attempts to recreate Kathleen Turner circa 1981 undermine too many scenes.
  11. Poetry, lesbian sex and murder might be a killer combination if a deadly pace weren't included in the mix.
  12. Reviewed by: Ken Fox
    50
    The plot itself isn't really strong enough to stand alone. And that leaves the film an essentially conventional whodunit, if one with a rather unconventional sleuth at its center.
  13. 38
    Remarkably sluggish and not particularly suspenseful.
  14. The Monkey's Mask is filmed with an eye toward an arthouse sheen, although Lang's dramatic pacing is sluggish and dull.
  15. Instead of suspense, there is confusion; instead of intrigue, a lot of inexplicable confrontation among characters whose significance is not so much enigmatic as obscure.
  16. 10
    The film seems dimly aware of its own ridiculousness, but it lacks the constitution for self-mockery.