- Studio: Universal Pictures
- Release Date: May 4, 2001
User Score
6.5
out of 10
Generally favorable reviews- based on 68 Ratings
User score distribution:
-
Positive: 44 out of 68
-
Mixed: 11 out of 68
-
Negative: 13 out of 68
Review this movie
-
Your Score10 out of 10
-
Please sign in or create an account before writing a review.
-
-
Submit
-
Check Spelling
-
Characters remaining: 5000 out of 5000
- User score
- Most active
- By date
- Most helpful
- Most Clicked
-
Sep 27, 20114"The Mummy Returns" returns....This time with terrible acting and a uninspiring plot. Its ultimately your average summer blockbuster.
-
[Anonymous]Jul 10, 20056More of the first movie, but dumber. Not outright bad, but the movie fails to make itself feel needed.
-
-
KarenH.Aug 6, 20012Awful. Basically no story, no character develops, just special effects. If that's what you like, great. I don't.
-
-
DavidDJan 5, 20063Again, I hated the "good guys". I so wanted them dead!! The same ole crap with a kid being a total annoying little loser.
-
-
ColeL.Nov 22, 20018Even though this movie tries hard to be a triffle funny, the plan backfires in many ways making the dialouge sound cheessy. But, the last movie had bad action sequences and a to much mumbo-jumbo. This movie really packs a hard punch with a lot of soild action.
-
-
NedD.Oct 3, 20013Definite step down in quality from the original (which wasn't all that amazing to begin with). The film confuses non-stop action sequences with excitement and interest; however, rarely has a so called "rollercoaster-ride" been to indescribably boring.
-
-
MattM.Jul 27, 20012An overly ostentatious summer cheese-fest that is extremely painful to watch. It is in no way rewarding, besides the pretty special effects. But the special effects are the backbone of this otherwise horrendous film. The acting is atrocious, the writing is even more so, and the dialogue is so derisory that it makes even the worst film look like a masterpiece. Bad, bad, bad!
-
-
RobC.Aug 30, 20013Bad!!
-
-
TheresaW.Oct 14, 20017I loved the movie, the action, the good looking men, and the unusal but great women in this movie! I also LOVE The Rock, and can't wait to see him in The Scoprpion King!
-
-
TheresaW.Oct 14, 20017I loved the movie, the action, the good looking men, and the unusal but great women in this movie! I also LOVE The Rock, and can't wait to see him in The Scoprpion King!
-
-
HarperOct 2, 20012Kill me now!
-
-
RyanM.May 26, 20018This movie is ten times better than its original. The dialogue is bad and most of the jokes are cheesy and unfunny, but the movie's action sequences are so good and the story isn't half bad. If you like action you'll love this. If you didn't like action you'll still like this. It's worth seeing twice for the effects alone.
-
-
JoshB.Jul 2, 20017Good fun. A mindless, action-packed summer flick. You'll enjoy it if you let yourself go.
-
-
TroyD.Jan 7, 20028Not a bad plot, but you cant go wrong with two chicks fighting in swimsuits.
-
-
NiciB.Mar 1, 20025This Movie is about an hour TOO long and is too confusing to follow!
-
-
SusanS.Apr 19, 20023You know, people were talking loudly in the theater during most of the movie, so I missed a lot of the dialogue. But, not surprisingly, it didn't matter. Brendan is a good actor. Why won't he make good movies?
-
-
DonP.Sep 7, 20020Idiotic.
-
-
PatC.Jan 5, 20042Takes off where "The Mummy" left off: Starts at the bottom and goes down.
-
-
ZacharyW.May 13, 20049The Mummmy Returns special effects are awesome and movie was excellent, but they should have gotten rid of the not needed scenes. All together it was an excellent movie. A+
-
-
Paolo670May 27, 20017Very good movie, but the only problem is that I expected something more exciting and fast. Some parts of the movie are too long that people get bored like the bus scene.
-
-
MichelleP.Oct 12, 20028I LOVED this movie. And I'm usually really picky about these kind of movies. But I only recommend it to fans of Egyptian mythology, like me. :)
-
-
JayS.Jan 19, 200210
-
-
Nov 2, 20106not as good as The Mummy, but the decent acting and the visuals were the only saving grace for this sequel.
-
Feb 15, 20117While it's not as good as the first movie it's still a good movie, the characters aren't as enjoyable this go around and neither is the plot, but the humor and action is still here, a good movie from beginning to end.
-
Jan 24, 20125I liked it but the thing about the film is that it has too much action and not enough plot. They sort of took the Michael Bay route where they give you a small amount of plot to satisfy you and they fill the rest of the time with action sequences. It can also be corny at times. It was ok but not as good as the first film.
-
May 12, 201210The mummified body of Imhotep is shipped to a museum in London, where he once again wakes and begins his campaign of rage and terror.
-
May 28, 201210Nice.
prev
next
Page:
- 1
-
80What matters is that the movie's a blast, right up until its protracted climax.
-
30Many of the visual effects are stunning, but others are downright cheesy -- especially an attempt to fuse the Rock's head onto a scorpion's body.
-
50A few billion 1s and 0s in search of a movie.