Metascore
63 out of 100

Generally favorable reviews - based on 35 Critics

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 23 out of 35
  2. Negative: 1 out of 35
  1. 90
    This bloody celebration finally gives the American Revolution the epic it deserves.
  2. 90
    A thunderous spectacle.
  3. Sentimental, overbearing, flag-waving--and a crowd-pleaser.
  4. Reviewed by: Richard Schickel
    80
    It has everything you want in an epic: sweep, scope, wild reversals of fortune and plenty of bold, basic emotions.
  5. 80
    Doesn't try too hard to be anything other than a vicarious experience that makes you crave the satisfaction you know you'll get when the hero gets his revenge.
  6. 75
    It is rousing and entertaining, and you get your money's worth.
  7. What might have been a treat for history buffs and a refresher course for the rest of us turns into just another occasion to watch Gibson shoot guns, swing tomahawks, and wreak other kinds of havoc on enemies we've been primed to hate.
  8. 75
    It's big, exciting, ambitious, and it makes you cry in all the right places.
  9. If Emmerich had any sense, he would have ceded the direction of the battle scenes to his star.
  10. Reviewed by: Mike Clark
    75
    Emmerich might have had a masterpiece, but he'll have to settle for what comes close to being a must-see movie today.
  11. Reviewed by: Jay Carr
    75
    It's often corny, but it's never boring, and it'll sweep you up in its momentum if you give it a chance.
  12. The best movie I've seen about the Revolutionary War.
  13. Has a flag-waving dumbness at its core.
  14. 70
    Only so much (pop)cornball tubthumping, a sweeping, occasionally stirring, always gorgeous bit of action-figure history.
  15. Reviewed by: David Ansen
    70
    There's no denying that Emmerich's film, though a good half hour too long, keeps us watching.
  16. Reviewed by: David Edelstein
    70
    It's depressing that this first movie in years to dramatize the American Revolution has so little to do with the politics of secession and so much to do with pop-culture themes of vigilantism.
  17. Reviewed by: Todd McCarthy
    70
    Has some emotional pull and isn't stuffy and dull.
  18. Mostly, the movie is riveting, well-done fare -- the stuff of Hollywood epic adventure.
  19. "We, the people" have never been big fans of movies about the American Revolutionary War. The Patriot, however, appears to be the movie that will break that historical jinx.
  20. It's a death-wish revenge thriller posing as a lavishly pastoral historical epic.
  21. As a whole, though, the movie is much less magnetic or believable than its star.
  22. Far from the smart historical epic some might have expected, is just another feisty summer shoot-'em-up.
  23. While the film contains some terrific, realistically bloody battle scenes, it has a distinctly Germanic feel, both in its epic heaviness and in the peculiar way it revises the history of the American Revolution.
  24. 60
    Patriot reflects on nothing, except perhaps that the American Revolution was a golden opportunity for Mel Gibson to go postal.
  25. Reviewed by: Robert Horton
    60
    Gibson's performance is robbed of his customary humor, and he flounders around in search of the character's core.
  26. 60
    Shamelessly stirring, brandishing Mr. Gibson's anguished masculinity like a musket. It may be effective, but you leave the theater feeling used.
  27. The film is long, empty and bogus.
  28. The Patriot makes the Revolutionary War look like super-produced studio footage of the L.A. riots.
  29. 50
    Undeniably handsome..., but no cliché is left unturned, right down to the spray of toy soldiers falling from the hand of a dead child. Everything old isn't new again.
  30. Reviewed by: Bob Thomas
    50
    Seems likely to stir rebuttal from historians, especially those on the other side of the pond.
  31. 50
    A movie of cornball sentiment, humorously anachronistic dialogue, and expensive Colonial Williamsburg sets.
  32. Reviewed by: Sean Means
    50
    Trots out more flag-waving wartime cliches than any movie since John Wayne's "The Alamo."
  33. Does benefit from Gibson's charisma...Whether it is quite good enough is another question.
  34. 44
    Whatever extraordinary ingredients are necessary to fashion a 1776 home run, this movie doesn't have them.
  35. 38
    Overblown sanctimony and sentimentalism as corny as the Fourth of July.
User Score

Generally favorable reviews- based on 50 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 13 out of 22
  2. Negative: 5 out of 22
  1. JonA
    1
    The dialog is so embarressingly corny that my father and i laughed at scenes that were suppose to be heartbreaking. some of the action scenes were alright looking but we've seen it all before, truly awful. Full Review »
  2. The cast is solid through out, There is a ton of solid action as well, and the plot is decent but could have been a lot better. I enjoyed watching it.
  3. Bottom Line: Mel Gibson is a powerful war hero in Roland Emmerich’s most worthwhile picture yet. Appallingly bloody but nevertheless greatly poignant epic stars Mel Gibson as Benjamin Martin, a hero in the French and Indian War, but preferring to just be a farmer. He is shocked to find that his son Gabriel (Heath Ledger) will soon enlist to fight in what we now know as the American Revolution, and in protection of his son, Benjamin diffidently returns to fight for freedom from the brutal British. Many who were disappointed with flops such as THE DAY AFTER TOMORROW, 10,000 B.C., and 2012 often hope to see better out of director Roland Emmerich. Though this isn’t his typical sci-fi film, THE PATRIOT is an excellent film directed by Emmerich, and this is a true must-see for anyone who was disappointed by the forenamed films. Both Gibson’s and Ledger’s performances in this film were phenomenal. Although there were a few battle scenes in which Mel Gibson seemed as if he was simply hacking away, ever so vengefully, that was truly the fault of the film’s screenwriter. When I first researched the cast for THE PATRIOT, I imagined (for whatever reason) that Mel Gibson and Heath Ledger would portray brothers. As there could be no possibility for Hollywood, at least, to cast such age-differing actors (at the time of this film’s release, Gibson was 44 and Ledger was merely 21), I was surprised; but I was not disappointed, as the two created a believable, cinematic father-son relationship. The musical score for this film, I must say, was spectacular. Composed by John Williams (who is known more for collaborating with director Steven Spielberg than anyone), it is placed very meaningfully in the appropriate scenes, and the feeling is extremely powerful rather than overwhelming. If you’re looking for a war film that is beyond simply decent, I would highly recommend THE PATRIOT. At the Oscars, it was nominated three times (Best Cinematography, Best Original Score, Best Sound), and the only thing that truly cuts it down from absolute supremacy is its running time–165 minutes in length, as well as an extended edition released with an extra ten minutes. Full Review »