- Studio: Fine Line Features
- Release Date: Apr 3, 1992
User Score
8.9
out of 10
Universal acclaim- based on 14 Ratings
User score distribution:
-
Positive: 14 out of 14
-
Mixed: 0 out of 14
-
Negative: 0 out of 14
Review this movie
-
Your Score10 out of 10
-
Please sign in or create an account before writing a review.
-
-
Submit
-
Check Spelling
-
Characters remaining: 5000 out of 5000
- User score
- Most active
- By date
- Most helpful
- Most Clicked
-
YoonMinC.Oct 5, 20036
-
-
MikeC.Mar 5, 20049A very clever movie with a classic twist at the end (the Willis/Roberts bit). But Robbins is too blank. He is miscast I think. The lead here calls for somebody you can like AND hate. Robbins is just too likeable. He should have played the Gallagher role, or the D'Onfrio role. D'Onofrio should have been the lead. Or someone else, maybe Hugh Grant, for instance.
-
-
AndyB.Jan 29, 200210An absolute must-see. In my mind, this is Altman's best work. The first shot is the coolest I've ever seen.
-
-
GarettT.Aug 2, 200310One of the best films ever made by Altman, and one of the best films ever made.
-
-
ThisIsGilbertMulroneycakesCallingFromRockallDec 29, 200310
-
-
Dec 22, 201110
prev
next
Page:
- 1
-
100Michael Tolkin's script abounds in such cynical wisdom, but it never loses an appreciation for the grace with which these snakes consume their victims. [13 April 1992]
-
40The surface activity keeps one occupied, but never adds up to much because none of the characters is developed beyond the cartoon level; and the snobby sense of knowingness that's over everything is uncomfortably close to what the movie is supposed to be dissecting.
-
100A rare commodity. It's brilliant and a guilty pleasure. A subtle damning of things Hollywood, Robert Altman's seriocomedy slices its target with a thousand, imperceptible razor cuts.