- Studio: Buena Vista Pictures
- Release Date: Aug 11, 2004
- Critic Score
- Most active
- Publication
- Most clicked
-
75Ends strong, in an ultimately smoother, smarter sequel.
-
75Offers enough glossy good cheer to appeal to everyone.
-
Fans of the first "Princess Diaries" will find enough laughs and diamonds in the rough to sustain them on their way to this important moral.
-
63Although all the key players are back - including, fans will be glad to hear, Heather Matarazzo as cynical sidekick Lilly Moscovitz - the freshness of the first is long gone.
-
63Has just enough fairy dust to charm its target audience.
-
63We all love a good fairy tale, but the enchantment is missing in this predictable sequel.
-
63As a movie, it's a mixed bag with a huge amount of heart.
-
60Perhaps the best film ever aimed at eight year-old girls to be directed by a 69 year-old man.
-
60Like its predecessor, it's Hollywood hokum at its most glamorous and effective.
-
As reassuring and soothing as a nursery story.
-
50If Andrews oozes regal poise and Hathaway radiates movie star allure -- and they do -- credit the actresses, not this flimsy fairy tale.
-
50Whenever Andrews - that incarnation of the sensible and the sensitive - glides on screen, PD2 sparkles.
-
50Like the first movie, Princess Diaries 2 relies primarily on the chemistry and screen appeal of Andrews and Hathaway to elevate the storytelling above the level of mush.
-
50Two hours pass painlessly enough, thanks to the affability of its trio of leads, Hathaway, Andrews, and Elizondo.
-
50The film's generic feminism pales beside its bloated sense of privilege, only underlined by a nonstop cabaret of sideshow acts.
-
Sometimes charming, sometimes a tad too silly and all the time predictable.
-
Panders to the worst traits in the target audience of spoiled third-grade girls.
-
40Anne Hathaway's charms barely rescue this exercise in lame comedy and romance.
-
40Good-natured but overstuffed sequel.
-
40If there is one high point to be found, it's that Julie Andrews sings for the first time since her 1997 throat surgery.
-
40Slovenly writing by Shondra Rimes doesn't help, and the movie bows out with an omigod-we-forgot-the-feminism twist too little, too late to redeem this lumpish excuse for a contemporary fairy tale.
-
40Benefits from extremely modest expectations. For it to be anything but painfully arbitrary would count as an accomplishment, so the fact that it's superficially entertaining qualifies as a minor triumph.
-
Garry Marshall is at it again. He disguises an insidious worship of wealth and privilege as a "feel-good" comedy about a wacky girl whose transition from ugly duckling to swan is supposed to inspire feelings of empowerment. In three words: It's a crock.
-
40Mr. Marshall, is not much of a film director. Depending on the budget, his movies look either cheap (like this one) or studio slick ("Pretty Woman"), and tend to have the same flat, presentational visual style that's familiar from most sitcoms.
-
40Too blandly insubstantial to expand its appeal beyond its target demographic.
-
40Andrews is still a treasure, but the series's currency is plummeting.
-
38Did you (Garry Marshall) deliberately assemble this movie from off-the-shelf parts or did it just happen that way? The film is like a homage to the cliches and obligatory stereotypes of its genre.
-
38So unfocused is Shonda Rhimes's screenplay and so flabby is Marshall's direction.
-
38Threadbare sequel.
-
30Scenes end abruptly, laughs are as rare as yetis, and the overarching question seems to be: Can we turn this into a franchise?
-
30There's not enough story in it to fill a shoebox.
prev
next
Page:
- 1
There are no user reviews yet.