- Studio: Buena Vista Pictures
- Release Date: Dec 14, 2001
User Score
7.1
out of 10
Generally favorable reviews- based on 168 Ratings
User score distribution:
-
Positive: 125 out of 168
-
Mixed: 7 out of 168
-
Negative: 36 out of 168
Review this movie
-
Your Score10 out of 10
-
Please sign in or create an account before writing a review.
-
-
Submit
-
Check Spelling
-
Characters remaining: 5000 out of 5000
- User score
- Most active
- By date
- Most helpful
- Most Clicked
-
RoyalT.Mar 7, 20080This movie was a waste of time. A sad commentary that anyone would consider giving this anything higher than a 1. Drivel.
-
-
PatrickBNov 14, 200810If you want a movie filled with cheap laughs,silly slapstick humor, or fart jokes, don't watch this movie! It's a sophisticated comedy/drama that makes me teary even after watching it dozens of times. The acting is spot on, the soundtrack is superb, and Wes Anderson's directing has never been so flawless. This is my favorite movie and it deserves to be worshiped.
-
-
MichaelL.Feb 26, 20085
-
-
DavidpMar 3, 200810Perfect. This movie is a perfect example of Wes Anderson's vision coming to life completely through absolute control and superb acting. "You wanna talk some jive?"
-
-
EmmaG.Aug 24, 20089Simply delightful! i enjoyed every minute of this splendid film and the splendid acting in it. one of the funniest and best films ive ever seen
-
-
WesM.Aug 31, 20089Hipster sensibility wears a bit, but it's consistently funny.
-
-
HarrySep 21, 20089This movie snuck by me and i never knew it was in theaters, but i watched it on comedy central and it was great.
-
-
RonL.Aug 18, 200510How the hell is the user rating on this so low. This movie is extraordinarily funny and smart. Oh I see why now.
-
-
ChrisB.Sep 9, 200510
-
-
tonyb.Oct 23, 200510
-
-
SeanR.Apr 13, 20068If you gave this a zero... then you don't understand wes anderson. His humor is in the characters and it takes a few times of watching to fully apreciate it sometimes.
-
-
MikeF.Jul 25, 200610One of my favorite movies ever made -- hilarious, touching, weird, and beautiful, with great visuals, fantastic music, snappy writing, and that ephemeral otherness that is the hallmark of true art. I sometimes wish I'd never seen it so I could see it again for the first time.
-
-
RD.Feb 27, 200710Very funny and touching. It is funnier than sex comedies which have only 6-7 big laughs. This has very consistent small but smart laughs.
-
-
TonyP.May 8, 20070This is the worst film I have ever seen in my life. Only White Noise and The Weather Man come close to as bad as this.
-
-
KevinR.Nov 14, 200410I love this movie. wes anderson is a genious. he gives such specific details about all his characters, and eventually all of those details play such an important part in making this movie real and good. the humor in it is very dry, but its hilarious. gene hackman and anjelica houston were so good in their roles. watch it and if you loved it as much as i did, check out rushmore and bottle rocket.
-
-
raVenAug 15, 20049(9.5) It's just good. I love comedy that talks up to its audience. We now know the result of throwing the disparate talents of vets like Hackman, Huston, Glover, and Murray together with young guns the likes of Stiller, the Wilson Brothers, and Platrow: the playing field gets raised a notch or two.
-
-
LawrenceP.Jul 25, 20049Not as good as "rushmore" or "bottlerocket" but close.
-
-
RobertH.Jan 13, 20021With all the hype this movie received I expected to be entertained. Instead, I saw a movie with characters that I felt nothing for and actors who seemed to be just collecting a paycheck. It is too bad to be believed. If you have insomnia - then this movie is your cure. To say that it was bad is an understatement.
-
-
ChrisW.Jan 15, 200210Without question the best movie of the year. Both hilarious and poignant at once, easily Wes Anderson's best movie to date.
-
-
JohnDec 10, 20020
-
-
AndrewE.Jul 19, 200210How can people not find this movie funny if the have any sense of humour at all? This should have won Best Picture. Hilarious.
-
-
BernieM.Jan 21, 20021If you wait for something funny in this movie, you'll still be in your seat well after the closing credits. Definitely the most disappointing movie I've seen in years.
-
-
ArnoldP.Dec 14, 20017The ultimate cast of too many quirky, highly neurotic characters but masterfully directed to provide some sophisticated chuckles. Gene Hackman as the patriach gives a tour de force performance worth the price of admission alone. Definate not for folks who loved the broad humor of, i.e. "The Trouble With Mary."
-
-
JackD.Dec 24, 20016Quirky + Different + Dysfunctional = Good....Unfortunately, not always. This movie tries and tries, but it seems to fall short. Hackman is terrific and the rest of the cast is good..but the script seems shallow and contrived.
-
-
[Anonymous]Feb 12, 200210This movie has everything that is missing from most Hollywood productions, comedy isn't based on pies and sex and subtlety, which must be a British word or something because it's been erased from the mind of American filmmakers.
-
-
BillW.Feb 26, 2002230 minutes of expository claptrap is substituted for actual character development at the beginning of the movie. After that it goes downhill. It's trying to be a character study with no characters worth studying.
-
-
ChadS.Jan 17, 20029There's a band named Vanilla Train wreck that made an album called "Mordecai" (also the name of Luke Wilson's bird), which made me wonder if Wes Anderson was predicting the outcome of Cameron Crowe's movie. "The Royal Tennenbaums", to our good fortune, is decidedly not a train wreck. It is the best film of 2001.
-
-
DJW.May 21, 20029
-
-
JesseH.Jul 20, 20020Worst movie I've ever seen! What a waste of talent. The so called CRITICS say John Q sucked but in reality, this movie was the crappy of the two!!!!
-
-
AlanaJul 4, 200210Beautiful.
-
-
SpongeBobS.Jan 9, 20022Annoying, neurotic characters. Inane dialogue. Basically a 2 hour smoking commercial.
-
-
ChrisBZSep 24, 200210This is a great movie. Sorry todd g, I didn't "pretend" to find humor in this film. It is a rare accomplishment in modern movies; funny and touching, without any sap. Maybe todd g should stick to contrived trite like "Kung Pow: Enter the Fist."
-
-
ToddG.Sep 17, 20020Those who find humor in this film, pretend to find humor so they too can be intellectual.
-
-
Double_aJul 11, 20028A wonderful world to be stuck in for a couple of hours. Very funny, great characters and spotted mice. What's not the love?
-
-
MichaelE.Aug 16, 20029Nigh unto perfect. Wonderfully hilarious, beautifully sad. Gene Hackman deserved another Oscar nom, especially over competition like Denzel Washington.
-
-
JinC.Dec 15, 20019
-
-
RichardAug 14, 200210Glorious. Funny, sad, with perfect performances and a magnificent soundtrack.
-
-
JohanÅ.Sep 8, 200210Simply brilliant!
-
-
KarenM.Feb 14, 20021
-
-
ArianO.Oct 23, 200210This movie is truly funny. This movie has intelligent comical hidden jokes. The best part is that this film is so brillant because they dont shove the laughs in your face like any other movie that in order to be funny they have to show a stupid person smoking Marijuana or having sex.
-
-
JacobSJul 24, 20024I watched this movie because it had received excellent reviews and also the fact that it featured Ben Stiller. (I had watched the truly superb "Flirting With Disaster" just the week before) . The Royal Tennenbaums was intellectually pretentious and only mildly funny.
-
-
HandsomeB.WonderfulJul 31, 20021This was the worst rubbisch I have ever seen on the movie screen. I didn't get what the interesting thing was in the plot... It didn't make any sense. It was as exciting as watching paint dry.
-
-
KristaB.Jul 9, 200210One of the best movies I've ever seen. Funny and tragic all at once.
-
-
TonyJul 19, 20023
-
-
DrewB.Jul 5, 20027Not one of the best films ive seen but pretty good effort. a GREAT cast. it gives u a good laugh.
-
-
BruceM.Jul 28, 20020I can describe this movie in two words: IT SUCKED!
-
-
ChelseaB.Jun 2, 200210The best.
-
-
C.ByrdJan 7, 20023
-
-
AlexK.Dec 28, 200110Better than "Rushmore," because here Anderson has managed to achieve real emotion without resorting to absurdity or the easy-out of manipulating the audience. A stylish triumph.
-
-
PatricioR.Mar 1, 200310The Royal Tenenbaums is a great movie. There are great performances and the screenplay is fantastic. Also, the soundtrack is perfect. A different movie, and I appreciate that in these times.
-
-
R.B.Jan 8, 20021How can a cast this good be in a movie this bad??
-
-
DanielW.Feb 18, 200210
-
-
J.McMasterJul 14, 20025People who vote higher than a 7 are pseudointellectual pedants who pretend to see brilliance where only dullness exists. Cut the pompous crap! The movie had its moments, and Gene Hackman had some truly funny lines, but there was too much here that was merely mundane.
-
-
JeffM.Aug 13, 20028Melds the goofball humour of BOTTLE ROCKET with the narrative style of RUSHMORE, creating a movie that's not quite up to par with either of Anderson's earlier efforts. Still, it has enough charm and orginality to keep you entertained throughout.
-
-
RyanM.Jul 19, 200210Heartflet, hilarious, and beautiful. Wes Anderson has achieved a kind of film that not many directors can.
-
-
AndrewC.Feb 1, 20028It's funny how diverse the ratings are for this film. It seems that many of you did not understand the comedy behind this film. It was as subtle as can be but that?s what made this film so great. Anderson did an excellent job getting the ideas across to the audience. It is just unfortunate that many of the viewers weren't able to see it.
-
-
MarkB.Jul 16, 20020There's no accounting for taste ... or lack of it! Why any critic would deceive the public by giving this piece of fluff a high rating is beyond me. This film is not remotely entertaining or interesting. It's a dull movie about dull people that are not realistic or remotely believable.
-
-
CartoonGuyAug 5, 20020Worst film ever! Too bad we can not use negative numbers. I did not laugh out loud once.
-
-
C.DanielsJun 7, 20029
-
-
KellerM.Jul 26, 20022This is a sad example of a young director listening to his press. This movie is narrated, yet it reads like a weak John Irving novel. This movie is over writen, over sensual, and over produced.
-
-
JohnD.Jun 24, 200210I have not laughed out loud at a movie for a year until this film.
-
-
GiorgioZ.Jun 15, 20020Possibly the most boring uninteresting movie I have ever seen. Absolutely no redeeming values whatsoever. Boring!!!!!
-
-
JeffB.Feb 20, 20022
-
-
JennieP.Jan 17, 200310I don't understand how anybody could have not liked this movie? I don't have to relate to characters t be entertained, i thought it was very funny, and those who didn't see the humor really need to re-evaluate what they think is funny... morons.
-
-
ZachP.Aug 28, 20027
-
-
FunkymonkeyApr 14, 20038
-
-
RobertoL.Mar 16, 20020It is just too bad we are unable to give a negative rating. I find it difficult to believe that the actors accepted their roles let alone permitted this whatever it is movie to be shown to the public. To say that it was terrible is a compliment as Webster would have to invent a new word for this drek.
-
-
NolanB.Aug 4, 20029Very Weird, but a very good movie with great acting. It's hard to tell if its a drama or a comedy, but it is brillant. If your looking for a light movie, stay away.
-
-
LuigiB.Jun 21, 20020Giorgio you are on the movie. Possibly the worst movie ever made. The characters are pathetic and unsympathetic. What a waste of talent.
-
-
CharlotteE.Dec 21, 20015The movie left me cold. Anderson spent too much time on the dressing and forgot about the turkey. It was full of nicely dressed quirky characters with no depth. The result was a boring film that was only mildly amusing. And I loved "Bottle Rocket" and "Rushmore."
-
-
JeremyM.Nov 14, 20027Gene Hackman delivers one of the strongest performances of his career in this unique comedy-drama. The rest of the cast lifts the material, which is pretty solid but suffered from some skimpy characterazation.
-
-
AliMay 21, 20029A perfect movie for a crazy like me, I feel like I've known Wes and Owen in a former life. Kumar is the best!
-
-
DaveP.Jan 17, 200210I've seen the film 4 times. Without question the most entertaining and insightful film of the year. It's also one of the best films ever made about family dysfunction. Why, oh why, do so many people not understand this film?
-
-
JayK.Jan 15, 200310One of the best movies EVER! Everyone should see this movie.
-
-
ByronD.Aug 5, 20020Fire all the movie reviewers. This is movie is an insult to humans.
-
-
EvanO.Jul 10, 20029This film is one of the most entertaining, thought-provoking, and enjoyable movies to be released in years. Fantastic directing, superb acting, and enough small studyable details to make The Royal Tenenbaums a cult classic for years to come.
-
-
GregoryT.Feb 17, 20028Hackman should have been nominated for best actor.
-
-
MaxP.Feb 23, 20038Clever. While the large cast stops the characters from becoming as endearing as those in Rushmore, the film is a treat never-the-less for Wes Anderson's wacky sensibilities and clever camera work.
-
-
AlexH.Sep 3, 200210The most amazing piece of film i have ever seen, simply brilliant. cinematic genius!
-
-
CalistaV.Aug 10, 200210The soundtrack was awesome! I think this movie was absolutely brillaint! It was poised, sophisticated, and interesting. It caught my attention through the entire movie! I think it was genius!
-
-
J.MurphyJul 12, 200210People who vote lower than a 7 aren't intelligent enough to understand the brilliance of Wes Anderson's directing, Owen Wilson and Anderson's writing, and the acting of the cast.
-
-
JayM.Jul 14, 20022
-
-
Jaded1R.Feb 11, 20021
-
-
AnthonySep 15, 200210Brilliant! One of the best I've seen.
-
-
CeliaK.Aug 7, 200210This movie was absolutely Brilliant! It may not be the best stupid silly comedy, but it had a lot of depth to it that you dont see very often in any movies today. It was dark and mysterious sometimes and then was very emotionaly satisfying and showed great detail about life. You people who said the movie was terrible must be Mentally challenged to say such a thing!
-
-
MariliaW.Aug 5, 20021It was just terrible. For an all-star cast you would expect something a little better. This is one of the worse pictures I've ever seen. I thought the Narrator would never shut up. It may have been more realistic if it was set in the 1940's. Then I could see a use for a wooden prosthesis.
-
-
DianeMay 19, 200210"The Royal Tenenbaums" was so charming and so delightful, I don't know how Wes Anderson and Owen Wilson did it.
-
-
YoonC.Sep 23, 20037Far too glib and superficial to work as anything but a series of gags it still has a fine performance by Hackman, a truly inspired oddball character who has done everything in his life to alienate his family and then tries every nutty thing to win them back when his estranged wife tries to marry another. Unfortunately, everyone else is made of cardboard; perhaps endearing but lightweight.
-
-
AnnB.Sep 30, 200310I dont use this term lightly but.... every single person who contributed to making this movie is a genius! i have been greatly inspired by this piece of work. much thanks and gratitude from myself to all who made this movies, especially wes anderson. thanks =D
-
-
SeanD.Oct 8, 200310One of my favorite movies of all time! Hilarious, thought provoking, simply wonderful! A wonderful cast. Inspiring.
-
-
PatC.Jan 5, 20046I thought it was a very good film. So I watched the second half and saw it dilute itself. But while family dysfunction is in the eye of the beholder, there's something for everybody.
-
-
christophs.Apr 17, 200510One of my all-time top favourites.
-
-
Aug 14, 20100WORST FILM EVER!!!!!!! Boring, not funny, terrible, everything about it is rubbish, i hate it. Seriously, how it got good reviews is beyond me. There are so many better comedies out there.
-
Aug 27, 201010Rarely do the elements of detaching quirkiness and heartbreaking drama combine to create such an irresistible product. Of course at the helm is Wes Andersen whose (borderline OCD) meticulous craft completely pays off for the enjoyment of the viewer.
-
Nov 2, 20108With an excellent cast and a very entertaining "style" this movie is lots of fun to watch. I've watched it multiple times and I could watch many scenes in it over and over again. This movie will talk to a lot of young people but at the same time it's not for everyone. That should not be hard to figure out though.
-
Apr 3, 20110
-
Jun 26, 201110
-
Aug 31, 20118The Whole thing about the dysfunctional family, that reunites for the sake of a sick family member (Royal Tenenbaun, played by Gene Hackman, which by the way he was fantastic on the movie), i enjoyed watching it, the final scene I wasn't expecting for that, so that made me like it even more, i do think it was a good movie, with a great cast.
-
Jan 27, 20124For all the detail and production, all the characters are monotone! Even people who LOVE this movie give a "but" to their explanation. Be honest. It's a large glass of rum and coke with mostly coke in it.
-
Feb 19, 201210
-
63Over the course of 108 minutes, The Royal Tenenbaums drops downward on the humor scale from hilarious to funny to quirky to pretentiously bizarre to chaotic.
-
90Anderson offers no phony uplift for the Tenenbaums or for audiences. But he does know how to take a sad song and make it better. In these troubled times, that's a gift.
-
80It's a B+, not an A. This would be enough for most filmmakers. But Anderson must contend with a higher standard. It's his fault for being original.