- Studio: Paramount Pictures
- Release Date: Apr 4, 2008
User Score
5.3
out of 10
Mixed or average reviews- based on 36 Ratings
User score distribution:
-
Positive: 18 out of 36
-
Mixed: 4 out of 36
-
Negative: 14 out of 36
Review this movie
-
Your Score10 out of 10
-
Please sign in or create an account before writing a review.
-
-
Submit
-
Check Spelling
-
Characters remaining: 5000 out of 5000
- User score
- Most active
- By date
- Most helpful
- Most Clicked
-
GrantZAug 24, 200910
-
-
RyencokeApr 8, 20080This movie was just horrible. Boring, Lame. Plot went nowhere. You don't see no monster/cool thing. Seriously so horrible.
-
-
ChadS.Apr 5, 20087
-
-
FraierM.Apr 5, 20089This is the most gory movie ever! Seriously. My date almost threw up at the leg part. This is a high intense movie that really gets under your skin. It follows the book good, except for a few parts and they switched two ppl around... but other than that, it was a good follower.
-
-
LevS.Jun 26, 20081Excellent gore effects. [***SPOILER***] But a cannibalistic vine? Laughable.
-
-
MatthewJul 10, 20089I don't understand all the negativity and derision this film has garnered. I found it to be a very interesting and well-done horror film. One of the better American offerings I have watched in the past 6 months.
-
-
TiagoM.Jul 10, 20088IS really not very original, but the cast is very good, the locations is ok and the tension is great!
-
-
PaulRJul 18, 200810
-
-
JayH.Jul 2, 20085In spite of some tense scenes and a good performance from Jena Malone, this is a tired story, needlessly gory and lacks originality. Well produced, It begins to fall apart after the first half. It does have it's moments though.
-
-
AnthonyC.Aug 12, 20080Awful!!!! While the acting is actually pretty decent, there is no plot and the parts just come out of nowhere without any explanation. I don't know how anyone can say this movie is even half-way decent.
-
-
MikeOct 19, 20082A very silly, laughable movie. And this was suppose to be a horror?!?
-
-
ChrisApr 5, 20083No character development to make you care about the actors, no backstory, and the "monster" is about as lame as I've ever seen. The ending sucked. The only good part was the realism of the gore, which is worth about 3 poknts.
-
-
KittyJ.Apr 5, 20088
-
-
J.TunesApr 5, 20088One of the best Horror/SciFi films I've seen in a long time. My girlfriend read the book and she agreed. Well acted, great special effects and lots of blood. If you can't watch surgeries on TLC this is not the movie for you!
-
-
ZaneSJul 22, 20087I really liked this movie, but the novel was like a thousand times better. They really should've followed the novel instead, and the characters were all mixed up & stuff. But I liked the movie, had some intense sense, enough gore, and an antagonist unlike anything you've really seen before.
-
-
czarAug 14, 20086I enjoyed this horror. It was edgy and suspenseful. As with any horror there are gaps in the story and lots of "why didn't they .." and "if only then" - but that is not the point. We had a good nights viewing and that is what it is about.
-
-
JessicaT.Apr 13, 20082Terrible movie. My friends and I just talked throughout the entire movie. There was no excitement, no plot twists, nothing. This movie was a disappointment.
-
-
HunterHApr 13, 20081
-
-
GigiM.Apr 24, 20085Interesting setting and hot cast, but it lost me when the vines got grabby and the flowers started making noise -- very Little Shop of Horrors. Gory/gross and yet too silly to be great.
-
-
VC.Jun 12, 20082Note to writer: If you are going to make a movie about people being trapped on a pyramid by locals who appear out of nowhere as soon as you set foot on the damn thing, please be kind enough to explain why said locals didn't just stop said people from going there in the first place, especially considering another group of random people had gone to the evil pyramid a few days earlier.
-
-
Nov 26, 20117It was actually pretty good, I know I was suprised to think so as well. Decent acting (I expected worst) and the story was interesting as well. I think it ends rather cliche if you ask me but it was still a good film that is worth seeing.
prev
next
Page:
- 1
-
63The Ruins is, with one major caveat, about as good an adaptation of Scott Smith's bestselling novel as Hollywood was ever going to make.
-
The characters never evolve past mere functionality, and the adherence to certain tried-and-true horror tropes -- the good girl who doesn't want to go but does, the generic naughty kids who get it first -- feels workmanlike, robbing the story of any real suspense or surprise.
-
40Ultimately less dependent on suspense or even scares than on squirm-inducing grossouts, this tale of Yank hardbodies vs. carnivorous creepers should flower briefly in hardtops, then spread like an invasive weed in ancillary.