Advanced Search Beta »
Basic Search Fields
The Score
User Score
7.0 out of 10

Generally favorable reviews- based on 36 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 28 out of 36
  2. Mixed: 5 out of 36
  3. Negative: 3 out of 36

Review this movie

  1. Your Score
    10 out of 10
    Rate this:
    out of 10
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling

  3. Characters remaining: 5000 out of 5000

view
per page
  1. AndyS.
    Oct 8, 2001
    4
    A fitfully entertaining, but utterly pointless caper flick with one of the weakest tacked-on sub-plots in the history of movies not made by George Lucas. I'm talking about the relationship between De Niro and Bassett which utterly backfires, backlighting the paper-thinness of De Niro's character rather than providing it with any depth, and badly embarrassing both actors in the bargain. In fact, De Niro's entire performance blends so seamlessly with his previous half-dozen that they could've used out-takes from his earlier work and spliced them into this movie with no loss of spontaneity. You certainly can't say that about Brando's performance; but, then again, that's about the only thing you can't say.… Expand
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  2. LesS.
    Jul 25, 2001
    9
    An absorbing, intelligent flick with a neat surprise ending...go see it!
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  3. AndrewC.
    Feb 1, 2002
    0
    As much as I LOVE edward norton and robert deniro, this film was one of the worst films i have seen in my life. and the ending does not make up for any of it. almost every aspect of this film had nothing to do with the plot of the store. i am extremely disappointed with the existence of this film. i am beginning to wonder if nortan and deniro owed frank oz a film, cause i dont see why those two would ever take up a film like this. horrible film. and it is also surprising how many of the critics gave it such a high score. it seems that they are AFRAID to give their real opinions due to the fact that such legendary actors may have been involved. politics I suppose.… Expand
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  4. DonD.
    Jul 19, 2001
    6
    This movie had some exciting moments and as usual, De Niro carried the day. Brando seemed to sleep walk through this one (which is nothing different since the "Godfather"). Edward Norton was great with his split characters. But, when the ending came, this viewer was left facing a most implausible and empty wrap-up!
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  5. SamB.
    Jul 21, 2001
    8
    Expected more from Brando and DeNiro - Ed Norton shone.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  6. BrunoB.
    Jul 30, 2001
    4
    Another sad example of twisted Hollywood at work attempting to condition our minds in a silent, subliminal fashion! What was Angela Bassett's presence all about? "Political correctness" gone public?
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  7. EvelynW.
    Aug 1, 2001
    10
    It had me on the edge of my seat from the beginning. I had to eventually put away my Raisinets and Nestle's crunch because I was so nervous. I was wondering from the beginning whether they would get caught and who, if anyone, would screw up in the end.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  8. [Anonymous]
    Aug 16, 2001
    10
    This great cast is put to even better use. This movie had great action, with no uneened gore. It is edge-of-your-seat suspense that has you begging for more. BRAVO!!
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  9. MustaphaM.
    Mar 16, 2002
    9
    One of the better movies to come along in quite some time. De Niro and Norton give great performances in what I thought was an awesome movie.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  10. DavidB.
    Mar 5, 2002
    7
    Well done. I enjoyed this flick.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  11. R.B.
    Jul 19, 2001
    5
    I really wanted to like this movie, but in the end I felt like there was a lot of build up for a very common ending. Loved the actors...wish I would have rented it though.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  12. CharlesR.
    Aug 27, 2001
    4
    A classic case of wasted talent. The movie is derivative, flawed, predictable, and almost a parody of the heist movies of the 1950s. De Niro seems uninterested and unwilling to do any more than walk through his part and pick up a hefty paycheck.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  13. [Anonymous]
    Oct 26, 2001
    10
    Ed Norton kicks.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  14. RobertB.
    Sep 29, 2001
    7
    Clever moments and good acting, but the ending is pretty thin and very weak compared to the rest of the movie.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
prev next
Page:
  • 1

Critic Reviews

All reviews »
Metascore
71 out of 100

Generally favorable reviews - based on 29 Critics

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 20 out of 29
  2. Mixed: 8 out of 29
  3. Negative: 1 out of 29
  1. Entertainment Weekly
    Reviewed by: Owen Gleiberman
    83
    A sturdily diverting old fashioned heist thriller that looks like a masterpiece of sheer competence next to the slovenly action fantasy F/X grab bags that have been passing for summer entertainment.
    Read full review
  2. Baltimore Sun
    Reviewed by: Michael Sragow
    50
    What's fatal to the film is that De Niro's character, though compelling, is so temperate and wise he gives no indication of why he was drawn to a life of crime.
    Read full review
  3. L.A. Weekly
    Reviewed by: Ella Taylor
    80
    You begin to wonder whether a story is ever going to show up. When it does, it's worth the wait for a long and well-turned set piece coordinating the heist, and two lovely flips in the plot.
    Read full review
See all critic reviews »