- Studio: Magnet Releasing
- Release Date: Feb 22, 2008
- Critic Score
- Most active
- Publication
- Most clicked
-
80If you're tired of zombie films or rabid people films, Signal is like a cool drink of water on a hot day. It's got all the goodness from the best of those genres while creating its own niche at the same time.
-
78Both apocalyptic and suitably vague, The Signal's only serious weakness comes from some borderline histrionic performances; then again, it's tough to call hysteria anything other than a sane response to a world gone mad. Crazy, man.
-
75Unlike traditional zombie romps, these crazies don't stumble around mindlessly, noshing on human flesh. They look and act like normal people - until the second they go bonkers.
-
The Signal has its share of things to say about urban paranoia, road rage, addiction - whether to sex, drugs or, more dangerously, consumerism. But it stands apart from other pictures of the same ilk by using its apocalypse as a backdrop to a bitter-sweet love story.
-
75It has a creepy power all its own.
-
75The Signal is like a Romero zombie movie in which the zombies aren't dead, they're just really temperamental. Evil here is technology-born. Maybe our cellphones and satellite dishes are giving us all the crazy.
-
75The film suffers slightly from diminishing returns -- its first third is by far its scariest -- but it's still a bold, artful take on a popular horror idea.
-
75The gimmicky yet strangely moving new fright flick The Signal distinguishes itself not through originality, but by smartly integrating just about every popular trend afflicting contemporary horror films.
-
70Borrowing heavily from the current trend in zombie comedy and apocalyptic horror but shifting it away from the usual undead norms, pic carves out a fresh angle in the crowded indie horror universe while blatantly stealing ideas from Kiyoshi Kurosawa's "Pulse."
-
70Cagey low-budget horror flick.
-
Part 1, directed by David Bruckner is superb, with affecting performances, a sense of dread reminiscent of John Carpenter's "Prince of Darkness" and many striking images. Part 2, directed by Dan Bush aims for George Romero-style ghastly humor, but it's more grating than funny. Part 3, directed by Jacob Gentry adds a splash of tragic love, but its preference for gore over feeling becomes monotonous.
-
58Mostly comes down to rage fiends going at one another with baseball bats, knives, pesticide tanks, and power drills.
-
50The picture eventually collapses under the weight of its own gimmickry, but it's still an entertaining distraction for cerebral horror fans who want an appetizer before the B-horror feast that is "Diary of the Dead."
-
50Just another low-budget effort from filmmakers who mistake cleverness for smarts.
-
50The movie has grand (and Grand Guignol) bits and pieces, but despite the hype it's no big deal. By horror standards, the premise isn't especially outlandish.
-
This uneven but impressive shot-on-digital shocker earns a marker in the mausoleum of apocalyptic horror--a genre that's proving (un)surprisingly durable in the new century.
-
In a movie about perception, misperception and the ramifications of misunderstanding, it's a bit ironic that the directors can't get out of one another's way.
-
The Signal combines the inconstancy of an omnibus film with the blandness of art by committee. The end result feels less like a blend of distinct styles than an opportunistic hodgepodge, a second-hand premise wedded to an attention-grabbing gimmick.
-
38It doesn't take long for the The Signal's promising beginning to fade into a haze that leaves the viewer exhausted and irritated.
prev
next
Page:
- 1
User score distribution:
-
Positive: 11 out of 18
-
Mixed: 2 out of 18
-
Negative: 5 out of 18
-
9
-
BrentW9
-
PaulioG7