- Studio: New Line Cinema
- Release Date: Mar 11, 2005
User Score
7.2
out of 10
Generally favorable reviews- based on 62 Ratings
User score distribution:
-
Positive: 46 out of 62
-
Mixed: 4 out of 62
-
Negative: 12 out of 62
Review this movie
-
-
Please sign in or create an account before writing a review.
-
-
Submit
-
Check Spelling
- User score
- Most active
- By date
- Most helpful
- Most Clicked
-
[Anonymous]Mar 20, 20051I felt the film presented characters and story in a vacuum, with missing pieces that never come together. The neat resolution rings hollow and untrue and the score was truly annoying and manipulative.
-
-
BobH.Apr 18, 20051[***SPOILERS***] Too stupid for words. A person is assumed to run away with his secretary and nobody attemps to contact the missing spouse or the police? Oops your dead sorry I hated you for three years. Gimme a break. Can she still collect on the life insurance? What idiot wrote this stuff?
-
-
JohnH.Apr 24, 20054I could not figure out who deserved the dope slap the most . . . the characters or the writter of the screenplay. The ending helped raise it to a 4.
-
-
LeroyMay 14, 20051Great Acting - YES! Dumbest storyline of the year? Absolutely. The surprise ending completely ruined the movie. Just laughable.
-
-
Georgie-PorgieMay 8, 20052Great acting wasted in a moronic screenplay. Am I the only one that realizes that a spouse can't be missing and no one in the family reports it to the authorities? Dumb meets the dumbest of stories ever told. By the way Costner was very good and so was the incomprable Joan Allen. Too bad they had nothing to work with. Moronic story.
-
-
T.M.Aug 1, 20050
-
-
stevenr.Aug 31, 20050Unwatchable after 15 minutes. so i gave it another 15. i didn't care at all about these self absorbed spoiled people. and then to find out joan allen was completely wrong about her husband. there are too many good films to watch, can't waste my time on this one.
-
-
MaryC.Mar 27, 20050
-
-
MarcK.Mar 30, 20054
-
-
CorinneM.Apr 10, 20051This film is just one more that portrays middle aged women as total bitches. Add it to: Spanglish, Monster in Law and Dr. T and the Women as my least favorite films ever. Is this all good actresses have to look forward to as parts when they're aging? It could have been good.
-
-
FantasyApr 12, 20052
-
-
KenLAug 6, 20053A big disappointment. Characters that are not likeble or engaging. A silly ending that makes no sense. And slow moving - I found myself checking the counter to see how much longer the movie had to go.
-
-
ShannonP.Jul 9, 20064Costner is at his best, delivering a Bull Durham-esque performance and creating a character that is funny and lovable. But the plot twist at the end is like being slapped in the face and called an idiot for watching and believing for 90 minutes that this was a decent film.
-
-
LaurenS.Oct 14, 20050Huge waste of 2 hours!
-
-
EleanorW.Mar 25, 20052A story so full of holes that even the good acting can't hold it together.
-
-
75The Upside of Anger belongs to Joan Allen (for whom director/screenwriter Mike Binder developed the project).
-
88A fiercely funny human comedy with jokes that sting and leave marks.
-
80Allen turns the character into a tour de force that unleashes an unexpected comedy about compassion and self-loathing.