- Studio: MCA/Universal Pictures
- Release Date: Sep 8, 2000
- Critic Score
- Most active
- Publication
- Most clicked
-
50The actors cannot be faulted. They bring more to the story than it really deserves.
-
50Has its compelling moments, and its playfully inventive ones, too.
-
50It's still the same sick story. Even the small touches seem stale.
-
50This thriller largely succeeds in putting quotation marks around its use of genre conventions, mixing subtlety and overkill to create a pensive mood that transcends the plot.
-
50What distinguishes The Watcher from all the films it consciously or unconsciously emulates is the intermittently witty, offbeat writing of debuting screenwriter David Elliot.
-
42Reeves is a stiff dancer and he delivers his lines in a full leather jacket monotone.
-
41The satisfaction of watching it essentially boils down to seeing whether or not Reeves can pull it off.
-
40If Reeves weren't onboard this picture would have gone straight to video.
-
40Leaves me wanting to watch Tomei and company in something more worthy of their abilities.
-
38Sluggish and preposterous, full of violence and cliches.
-
38Isn't even worth a glance.
-
30Once the terror ends and the credits roll, we finally get to the best part: a merciful escape.
-
25The picture's real interest lies in detailing the villain's sadistic crimes, though, and this is rarely fun or edifying to watch.
-
25The movie is paint-by-numbers with several numbers skipped.
-
25A crass, mechanical attempt at a thriller that should have gone straight to video.
-
25A hodgepodge of half-baked visual styles can't disguise the fact that this dismal thriller is all situation and no story.
-
25A story about unmotivated characters trapped in an ill-conceived plot.
-
25It's lively but fails to disguise the fact that his (Charbanic) script is a dud and his career in videos has taught him little about the art of narrative storytelling.
-
20It stinks pretty bad, but not so bad you'd go out of your way to avoid it.
-
20Fails to fulfill.
-
Sidesteps any juicy subtext in favor of routine chase-movie thrills.
-
20Neither acutely suspenseful nor particularly thrilling but instead mainly numbing.
-
20Emerges as a formulaic thriller that plays more like direct-to-video fare than a megaplex-worthy feature.
-
15An uninspired, standard-issue mimeo whose only distinguishing feature is a reversal in its casting.
-
10A dismal new serial-killer thing.
-
10By the end of The Watcher you'll need your own prescription.
-
10It's something no one should watch.
-
0A shockingly, unbelievably bad movie.
prev
next
Page:
- 1
User score distribution:
-
Positive: 5 out of 8
-
Mixed: 0 out of 8
-
Negative: 3 out of 8
-
FelixC.1Too easy to predict. Keanu Reaves cannot play a bad guy, he doesn't scare me.
-
R.L.9An extremely entertaining cat&mouse thriller that will have you guessing at every turn.
-
RodG.6This movie was okay. It got 28 reviews from critics. Critics are like weathermen. They're almost always wrong.