Metascore
49 out of 100

Mixed or average reviews - based on 30 Critics

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 15 out of 30
  2. Negative: 6 out of 30
  1. 80
    If you're interested in heavy-lidded moodiness and lots of attitude, Phillippe and Del Toro can't be beat.
  2. Reviewed by: Gemma Files
    80
    A tiny slice of bleak, black near-perfection.
  3. 80
    May feel redundant, but it is stylish and intelligent.
  4. It's good fun for bad boys.
  5. All the players deliver performances that kill.
  6. Reviewed by: Andy Seiler
    75
    Gives new meaning to the phrase "not for the squeamish."
  7. Plays like an unusually ritzy festival circuit audition film, though McQuarrie, it must be said, aces the audition.
  8. 70
    Way of the Gun is a self-consciously American odyssey.
  9. 63
    There's a good story buried somewhere in this melee.
  10. What pulls us along through the inky shoals of The Way of the Gun? Sheer style, plus the movie's refusal to play nice.
  11. 63
    Sporadically engrossing in a pulpy kind of way.
  12. A confused, empty, only occasionally funny mess of a movie.
  13. 63
    Falters seriously is its too-leisurely pacing.
  14. So many characters to keep track of, so little time!
  15. Reviewed by: Jay Carr
    63
    Sometimes trips over its own contrivance, especially at the ammo-ridden end.
  16. Reviewed by: Emanuel Levy
    60
    Each of the talented thesps has some good moments, but, ultimately, none can rise above the limitations of the material and filmmaking.
  17. Edgy, hard-boiled crime drama that is very much in this Tarantino-esque tradition.
  18. 42
    An empty, affected exercise, executed with just enough style to make you wish McQuarrie had a motive beyond his own career.
  19. Reviewed by: Frank Lovece
    40
    In the end the film has absolutely nothing to say.
  20. Reviewed by: Steve Mikulan
    40
    Isn't a bad film, but as we watch it we're constantly rewriting it in our minds to make it a better one.
  21. This film is no "Usual Suspects," because there is no twist, no gotcha.
  22. Reviewed by: John Anderson
    40
    An implement of destruction loaded with more borrowed film riffs than could be compiled by 47 clones of Robert Rodriguez..
  23. Rotten, pretentious movie full of minimalist dialogue and self-consciously arty cinematography.
  24. 25
    As ugly, excessive and vulgar as "The Usual Suspects" was stylish, subtle and suave.
  25. 20
    Doesn't deliver an ounce of charm.
  26. Reviewed by: Richard Corliss
    20
    What aims at being terrifying is just loud and goofy.
  27. The directorial debut of the writer of "The Usual Suspects" keeps tossing the genre hand grenades one might expect, but they all wind up duds.
  28. A lot of uninteresting and unpleasant people torture, abuse, and fire guns at a lot of other uninteresting and unpleasant people, in a repulsive, interminable would-be crime thriller.
User Score

Universal acclaim- based on 19 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 14 out of 14
  2. Mixed: 0 out of 14
  3. Negative: 0 out of 14
  1. ApocalypseBrown
    9
    What makes me sick is when critics love **** films and pan excellent ones! Fortunately this follows in that tradition. This film will give you what you want to take from it - from violence, intrigue, warmth and humor, it packs it all. And considering the emotional ride it takes the viewer on, it is easy to over-looked its small yet silly faults. Ok Caan and the lover of Juliette Lewis (Dr dude) performances weren't memorable, but the rest of the cast coupled with the slow yet tense car chase scene and the dramatic shoot-outs leave you almost breathless. I am not a critic who is paid to give bad scores, so nine reflects the quality of this venture! 'What you gonna tell God now'? Full Review »
  2. KrisA.
    10
    Great action movie. Exciting all the way through, and it has my favourite opening scene of all time. Watch the first scene if nothing else.
  3. PhilN.
    8
    I love this film... it has its flaws, but I honestly can't see why it is so underrated. The principle characters are despicable and there's no justification for their actions... that's partly the point of the film, and is - to me - an honest and realistic way to depict violence (far preferable to action movies in which we're asked to forget, forgive or applaud the various deaths the protagonists cause), yet it seems to be a common criticism of this film. I just don't understand that way of thinking. It seems to me the intentional coldness and amorality seen in this movie is way out of fashion now - had it appeared in the 70s, would it have been a classic like Point Blank? The film has some truly excellent dialogue (and non-verbal communication), but it has to be said that McQuarrie got a bit carried away at times and some of the lines are just too oblique to be understood or too "clever" to be believable. And, while their motivation is clear, Parker & Longbaugh's tactics in the final action scene are questionable, their approach somewhat less intelligent than we should expect from them. But in my opinion these are negligible flaws next to the film's strengths - not least, some of the finest firefights ever filmed. All performances from biggest to smallest are absolutely spot-on, and the score is wonderful. I would say, if you're a fan of 70s films like The Getaway or Bullit that are appreciated for their bleak and unpleasant qualities, then you'll probably get a kick out of Way Of The Gun. I wish there were more crime/action movies like it. Full Review »