- Studio: Warner Bros. Pictures
- Release Date: Sep 1, 2006
User Score
3.4
out of 10
Generally unfavorable reviews- based on 77 Ratings
User score distribution:
-
Positive: 18 out of 77
-
Mixed: 12 out of 77
-
Negative: 47 out of 77
Review this movie
-
-
Please sign in or create an account before writing a review.
-
-
Submit
-
Check Spelling
- User score
- Most active
- By date
- Most helpful
- Most Clicked
-
HannaA-LOct 20, 200710
-
-
MarkG.Sep 2, 200610This was a good time, a failed horror, a mediocre mystery, but a hilarious possibly unintentional comedy. It was a fun movie.
-
-
kitAug 21, 200710The funniest film you'll ever see.
-
-
JosephBSep 11, 200610People are unjustly attacking a decent film.
-
-
TimH.Oct 17, 20093
-
-
Dec 14, 20124
-
JoshW.Oct 3, 20061I gave it a 10 for picking a good movie to start with. But I had to minus 9 points for remaking that movie so poorly. I hate it when people remake a solid film an either a) can't improve upon it what so ever or b), screw it up totally.
-
-
ReaSep 1, 20062I couldn't believe Nick Cage or Ellen Burstyn would be caught dead in such a dog. Bad script, and even the normally good Cage's acting didn't connect with a shred of reality. Fellow movie goers hooted and jeered on their way out of the theatre.
-
-
JoeB.Sep 2, 20062
-
-
Rev.RikardSep 5, 20064
-
-
MarioB.Sep 1, 20063The original 1973 version was a suspenseful and chilling horror movie. This version was apparently made as a comedy. However, Nicholas Cage is miscast as the hapless cop unintentionally helping to bring in the harvest. Adam Sandler would've been better.
-
-
AnneS.Sep 1, 20060The original was campy and has some appeal. This sexless "retelling" of a fertility festival is like a bad blind date with a girl that won't shut up.
-
-
VinoA.Sep 1, 20061Worst movie I have ever seen, not called "Be Cool". A total disappointment. A sorry attempt at scary...more like hysterically bad. Cage did well with the script that he was given....no plot or character development.
-
-
stSep 2, 20060
-
-
ElliotP.Feb 4, 20075For those of us who have always wondered if Nicolas Cage would ever star in a movie so poorly made that even his marvelous presence and personality could not save it - now we know.
-
-
NDApr 1, 20071Awful film - watch the original instead. Cage is a terrible actor imo! Boringgggggggggggg!!!
-
-
JohnA.Sep 1, 20060
-
-
MarianneS.Sep 1, 20061What a sad day for Nick Cage fans...Dude, what were you thinking when you read this script?! How did your cell phone suddenly get a signal? And the bear suit...I don''t think the writers were expecting laughs from the veiwers, but the theater I was in was in stitches. I look forward to World Trade Center for a real Nick Cage fix. This was truly a bad movie.
-
-
DamonCSep 2, 20062I simply love this film, because it is sooo hilarious. I spent the last half hour laughing out-loud, almost non-stop, till I was tearing! It's probably the funniest film I've seen all year. Oh ... you mean it's a horror movie?
-
-
ColinR.Sep 2, 20062
-
-
BobbieSep 26, 20060If this were on free TV I would change the channel as that is how awful it is. Avoid.
-
-
DamianMSep 6, 20060I'd rather be thrown into the burning Wicker Man than have to sit through this utter tripe again. Buy the original instead.
-
-
JVJan 7, 20076Seriously, it was not that bad, people need to stop being drama queens, the ending was lame, but the acting was decent and the vacancy of the notable female characters was enough to bring about the creepy feel average horror flicks need
-
-
JakeFeb 5, 20075Picking Nicholas Cage to star in this movie was the only good decision the director made. The movie was terrible but give Cage credit for the work that he did in it.
-
-
SherrieD.Sep 1, 20060I love Nick Cage; I talked 2 other people into going to this joke; and I seriously mean I hope the whole thing was an expensive Hollywood joke. It wa the worst movie, worst plot, worst acting I am sure I have ever experienced. Nick, Babe; what the hell were you thinkin? Tell me this was all for fun!
-
-
a1Sep 10, 20061Waste of time and not even worth Netflix ... I excepted more from the actors, however, I guess they prove that at a certain point actors have the ability to bring in money despite the lack of a plot or anything else even a
-
-
MantoothL.Sep 18, 200610The funniest movie you will see all year. It's up there with Showgirls as far as unintentional humour is concerned.
-
-
JimG.Sep 2, 20062This movie goes down in flames. The central motivation for the main characters emotional instability was wiped from the remake and thus makes the floundering of Cage's Malus without reason.
-
-
jOEpSep 26, 20060
-
-
RickJ.Sep 5, 20060
-
-
JeffF.Sep 6, 20065Not a great movie, but at least it was better than The Village.
-
-
yoyoDec 7, 20071Wanted more laughs out of this craptastic movie then I got. Totally the worst remake in the history of remakes. Best and only good part was when he was in the bear costume and decked that woman. Who wants to see Nicholas Cage ride back and forth on an island on a lame ass bicycle for two hours, posing as an angry cop? Thankfully it was a library rental.
-
-
NeilS.Jan 29, 20070
-
-
[Anonymous]Feb 28, 20078I am shocked at the hatred towards this film. I found it to be very interesting.
-
-
GHApr 28, 20070A dreadful mess of a movie. Will someone please ask second rate directors to stop attempting remakes of classic movies which dont need to be remade. Please.
-
-
JonW.May 2, 20075This movie is not good, although the "did-I-just-see-that?" spectacle of a bear-suited Cage punching a woman in the face makes it worth a cheap rental. Also: "NOT THE BEES!!! NO!!! and "Give me the bike!" and "HOW'D IT GET BURNED? HOWDITGETBURNEDHOWDITGETBURNED??!?! and "BITCHES!!" Actually, this might be an unsung masterpiece of comedy. So I'll compromise and give it a 5.
-
-
AMovieCriticAug 3, 20071
-
-
TrentNov 1, 20062Such a lame ending to this not so thriller/suspence of a movie that you would think M. Night Shamalon made it.
-
-
baoDec 26, 20060This has got to be one of the worst films ever made. It leaves me lost and disappointed. Forced storyline with no sense of purpose/meaning. The only good thing about this movie was Nick's acting.
-
-
ChadS.Oct 29, 20064
-
-
DaveC.Aug 31, 20063a terrible yet promising film that shows us only good acting and a couple screams but leaves us dissapointed and empty. A day later you will forget what you saw and then remember "Oh yeah, that movie was wack"
-
-
ISep 15, 20060Pluck it, stuff it, and eat it for Thanksgiving because this one's a turkey. I've lost two hours that I can't get back.
-
-
MiguelG.Sep 22, 20067An average thriller that I enjoyed
-
-
AndrewG.Nov 22, 20085
-
-
Mar 28, 20110Hilarious. The dialogue was so goddamn bad that I laughed like a moron. Why can't Nicholas Cage make bad movies that are funny? As far as I'm concerned, this is easier to get through than Bangkok Dangerous. Or whatever the hell he does now.
-
Feb 13, 201110Honestly, the best movie I have ever seen in my entire life. Cage's acting really brings it home. When he's screaming "THE BEES THE BEES" there is really this scene of truth and pain to the character. Spectacular. An absolute masterpiece.
-
Feb 19, 20131I enjoyed the movie and Nicholas Cage's character well enough, even with having heard other people say that it was silly etc in these other reviews. But I was still impressed with his detective skills, etc. but was very disgusted with the ending which was so disappointing after all that we go through in this story that I'm giving the movie a 1 out of 10.
-
Nov 14, 20126Nicholas Cage punching a woman whilst wearing bear costume. This movie has it all. A welcome addition to the exclusive so-bad-it-is-good movie club. What a hoot.
-
Nov 19, 20122I laughed out loud in theaters multiple times. This movie is full of those moments where the film making is so poor that it's easy to laugh. Nick Cage is awful in this role too, playing pretty much every other character he has played in his life. Serious guy, would be an in depth analysis of the bonehead that Cage is trying to portray. Oh, and he hits women. Multiple times...
-
Nov 28, 20122Horribly written movie which builds to one of the worst climaxes I have ever seen in all my days of filmgoing.
-
Mar 24, 20135A lot of criticism has been given to this movie especially because Nicolas Cage doesn't give proper treatment to his role but in general I thought that this was an interesting and yet really weird movie at the same time. I guess I'm saying i've seen worst.
-
May 2, 20138nunca fui fanático de la original pero esta nueva adaptación es un lento pero seguro paso a un nuevo genero de películas de suspenso dramático lento y aunque este nuevo genero no le gustara a muchos a los otros les parecerá una evolución en el suspenso
-
Apr 11, 201310
-
40The Wicker Man isn't all that bad a movie; it's visually striking and ambitious in some ways. It just fails to bring enough to the table to fully distance itself from the original.
-
38There may be a way to remake 1973's cult thriller The Wicker Man, in which a deeply Christian cop has his religious convictions shaken to the core as he investigates the disappearance of a child from within a cheerfully pagan community, but Neil LaBute didn't find it.
-
40This wasn't a horror film the first time around, and LaBute makes sorry feints at effective creepiness, letting the story roam in circles just like Cage.