User Score
8.5 out of 10

Universal acclaim- based on 30 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 29 out of 30
  2. Mixed: 0 out of 30
  3. Negative: 1 out of 30

Review this movie

  1. Your Score
    10 out of 10
    Rate this:
    out of 10
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling
  3. Characters remaining: 5000 out of 5000

  1. StephenieM.
    Jan 14, 2006
    10
    It's a great, must see movie. Adventure, love, loyalty. Hurry up !
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  2. ChadS.
    Feb 21, 2006
    7
    Halfway through "Tristan & Isolde", Rufus Sewell started to remind me of David Byrne with a bigger head(not suit), and then late in the film, Lord Marke tells someone to "take [Isolde] to the river," which is a can't-be-a-coincidence reference to the Heads' cover of the Al Green classic. Apart from looking like Byrne, Sewell, as the cuckoled king, also makes James Franco and Sophia Myles look more seasoned. Franco, in particular, should've aimed higher than Patrick Swayze in "Ghost" as his acting role model. Like the crooner of "She's Like the Wind", Franco emotes like his dog died. It's Sewell who makes Isolde seem like a trophy wife. My favorite part of "Tristan & Isolde" is when it turns into a sports movie in the vein of "The Karate Kid". Expand
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  3. Robert
    Jan 21, 2006
    7
    good entertainment, period drama is entertaining, great to see mythic tale translated to big screen.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  4. ClaudiaL.
    Jan 13, 2006
    0
    Is the best movie.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  5. SamanthaC.
    Jan 14, 2006
    8
    Come on, of course the critics hate it! They always hate movies like this ... if you want to see a movie that is a good old fashioned "love story" ... go see this! It's definitely a chick flick, but most women will love it! It's like eating chocolate, makes you feel good and makes you feel like going out and finding your own "Tristan"!
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  6. JessicaS.
    Jan 14, 2006
    10
    What can I say? I'm a sap.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  7. EllyMurray
    Jan 14, 2006
    10
    This movie is on my top three movies of the last 5 years. It is STUNNING !! If you haven't seen it, then you MUST !
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  8. KaylaR.
    Jan 17, 2006
    10
    This is my favorite movie you can see the emotion in the actors' eyes.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  9. LindaS.
    Jan 21, 2006
    10
    It was awesome. James Franco was hot. My heart was at the bottom of my stomach when I left the movie because I was so sad. Also, I believe that the younger crowd will enjoy this more. That's why the user ratings for the movie is usually higher than the critic's ratings.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  10. JillianM.
    Jan 20, 2006
    9
    This movie was really really good! I loved every minute of it! All of the actors and actresses did a wonderful job. I can't wait to buy it.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  11. [Anonymous]
    Oct 9, 2006
    8
    Aside form James Franco's Mr.-Potato-Head portrayal of Tristan, this movie is a gem. It's beautiful to watch and the supporting cast is strong. It wasn't as predictable as I feared and the ending, albeit tragic, was a relief. The fight scenes were great.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  12. PatC.
    Jun 30, 2006
    6
    Slow-starting but eventually compelling story of two lovers whose estrangement sows the seeds of the British Empire. Place the blame for the continuing trouble between the English and Irish squarely where it belongs, on the Romans.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  13. MichalF.
    May 15, 2007
    10
    Wonderful music, great history, very good acting, I'm in love with this movie.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  14. CrystalP.
    Jan 14, 2006
    9
    I think most critics who didn't like the movie is because they were expecting a romance. Yes, the movie has romance, but there's also battle scenes and historical drama. Since the legendary story is a romance, I think the only thing they could do to make the movie better is develop the love story a little more.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  15. ThomasL.
    Jan 14, 2006
    9
    It really is pleasant to see a movie that doesn't try to be something it isn't. It seems like the director and actors all knew their role and what they hoped to accomplish. As a result of this clearly defined purpose, it acheives a certain relaxed elegance. Its not pretending to be "the next classic film," but it doesn't need to.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  16. JohnH.
    Jan 14, 2006
    6
    Not as bad as the snobs think. Tedious at times but overall entertaining. After all every movie[or book ] can't be great.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  17. Christa
    Jan 15, 2006
    8
    Contrary to what some people might think, this is NOT a chick flick (well not entirely). Of course, it's a romance, but it also deals with treason, battle, courage and loyalty. I agree with Premiere and some people here to say that this is not a masterpiece, not a 'renaissance' in the art of epic romantic movies, BUT it is really entertaining with fantastic cinematography and great acting. There were not a lot of men in the theatre, but those who were there actually enjoyed the movie a lot... Expand
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  18. SeanR.
    Mar 28, 2006
    6
    What a great movie! What terrible acting! James Franco shouldn't get a part in a elementary school production of Snow White let alone a well made movie! Whether he was fighting, having sex, or at a party his face never changed expression! Apart from that somewhat major detail the movie was very good.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
Metascore

Mixed or average reviews - based on 30 Critics

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 10 out of 30
  2. Negative: 6 out of 30
  1. 42
    Moves so sluggishly that someone must have been dosing the cast and crew with Nyquil.
  2. 50
    In the end, the filmmakers strike a bad bargain between action and myth: In their obvious attempt to shoo everyone into the tent--romantic and roughneck alike--they don't serve either end of the spectrum very well.
  3. 75
    By removing elements of magic and operatic excess from the story, the brothers Scott focus on what is, underneath, a story as tragic (and less contrived) as the one cited in the ads, "Romeo and Juliet."