- Studio: Columbia TriStar Home Video
- Release Date: Jun 28, 2000
- Critic Score
- Most active
- Publication
- Most clicked
-
67In a summer of cardboard figures in splashy spectacles, that makes for a refreshing change, an intriguing, entertaining and altogether sweetly mystifying misfire. In other words, another quintessentially Alan Rudolph picture.
-
63A cranky failure with brilliant moments.
-
63Trixie has "cult favorite" written all over it. That is to say, the general public is likely to say ixnay.
-
63There are so many wonderful moments in Trixie and so few films like it that you wish Rudolph had given it a few more rewrites.
-
60For me, Trixie finds its own peculiar groove, and-buoyed by a compulsively watchable actress-folds neatly into the off-center work of a distinctive American director.
-
60So much of the film is so funny, inspired and sophisticated, the performances so richly nuanced, that many viewers, Rudolph admirers in particular, will be inclined to forgive a little self-indulgence on the part of this authentic auteur.
-
50This is not the sort of movie you make it your business to see in a theater. But if you're ever surfing cable TV and come across it, you'll linger.
-
50Eventually evolves into a murder mystery that isn't very compelling.
-
50The movie does have a certain amount of star power and occasional bursts of inventive mise en scene, which do a good job of diverting us so we don't realize that not much else is going on.
-
48This is one Rudolph opus that leaves no afterglow.
-
40In the long, hit-and-miss career of writer-director Alan Rudolph, this misbegotten comedy falls squarely into the miss bin.
-
With his new film (which he also wrote), Rudolph seems content to slap a flimsy film-noir plot on an unending stream of malapropisms and word games and call it a "screwball noir."
-
33A movie built on one joke -- an old one -- and an incoherent, even idiotic plot.
-
30Director Alan Rudolph kills this promising film off with a combination of bad writing and wrong-headed direction.
-
25The acting is solid and the heroine's quirky dialogue is amusing for a while. But repetitious writing and a weakly constructed story turn the promising premise into a disappointing mishmash of crime, politics, and show business.
-
25Every character is quirky, and each has a schtick.
-
25Wastes an A-list cast in a sorry send-up of B-movie private-eye cliches.
-
25Torturously whimsical gumshoe caper.
-
20Happily stuck between a rock and the deep blue sea.
-
20Despite its occasional flashes of brilliance (every Rudolph film has them), this unsavory stew never comes to a boil.
-
20Although the hallmarks of Rudolph movies can be found everywhere -- they don't add up to the usual magic this time.
-
12It's so painful to sit through you eventually stop feeling sorry for the floundering cast.
-
12Highfalutin swill determined to pass itself off as a jazzy caper.
-
10Classic Rudolph: a tone of sweet-edged, slightly kooky melancholy, a terrific cast mostly left to its own devices and a few intriguing moments. Not, I'm sorry to say, a movie.
-
10As overlong and undermotivated as it is absentmindedly incoherent.
-
10Where's the comedy?
-
10If this retro crime comedy had been a Broadway play, it would have closed out of town.
-
0The whole movie is like that: cute, dead and endless.
prev
next
Page:
- 1
There are no user reviews yet.