Underworld: Evolution

Metascore
36

Generally unfavorable reviews - based on 21 Critics

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 3 out of 21
  2. Negative: 9 out of 21
Watch On
  1. Reviewed by: Joe Leydon
    70
    Overall package is potent. A few rock-the-house scenes of slam-bang derring-do -- are nothing short of sensationally exciting.
  2. Reviewed by: Ken Fox
    63
    True to its serial roots, this equally silly but undeniably entertaining sequel to "Underworld" (2003) picks up right where its high-grossing predecessor left off and offers more of the same.
  3. A monster chiller sequel that is visually spectacular but rather overburdened with story.
User Score
8.7

Universal acclaim- based on 434 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 66 out of 97
  2. Negative: 20 out of 97
  1. Feb 14, 2011
    10
    why are "professional critics" so dense?
  2. Dec 11, 2011
    2
    How can a movie as bad as Underworld get any worse? That was what I found myself wondering at the end of Underworld Evolution, a film soHow can a movie as bad as Underworld get any worse? That was what I found myself wondering at the end of Underworld Evolution, a film so colossally bad it deserves some kind of award to emphasise the fact its dreadful. It has a terrible script, two wooden leads, a boring supporting cast and some awful set pieces. It's just bad. Really, really bad. Full Review »
  3. Oct 1, 2011
    4
    This review contains spoilers, click full review link to view. "Underworld: Evolution" is just annoying. Why are the vampires and Lycans just fighting consistently? No plot twists, witty script, or even chilly scares. It's a movie you'll get to watch and forget in a few moments. Full Review »