- Studio: Screen Gems
- Release Date: Jan 23, 2009
User Score
7.3
out of 10
Generally favorable reviews- based on 98 Ratings
User score distribution:
-
Positive: 78 out of 98
-
Mixed: 7 out of 98
-
Negative: 13 out of 98
Review this movie
-
-
Please sign in or create an account before writing a review.
-
-
Submit
-
Check Spelling
- User score
- Most active
- By date
- Most helpful
- Most Clicked
-
JamesO.May 18, 200910A very good prequel movie. I definitely hope they make a 4th in the series sometime after the events of the 2nd movie. Definitely a must watch movie!
-
-
Oct 1, 20114"Underworld: Rise of the Lycans" is the same tedious vampire vs werewolf movie. There's nothing new, but its Michael Sheen's brilliant performance that will keep you entertaining.
-
CariN.Mar 24, 20098
-
-
GeorgeMMay 20, 20097
-
-
JagFeb 7, 20098
-
-
MisaaA.Jan 23, 200910a must watch gory prequel to the two amazing underworld movies.
-
-
KM.Jan 24, 20091I despised this movie on every level. From the incredibly bad overacting of the lead villain to the entire storyline which had nothing novel, nothing to say, and nothing to show. Absolute crap. It insults your intelligence at every level. Give some credit for decent set design but this is the type of movie that they make you watch in hell.
-
-
RobertB.Jan 25, 200910I'm a fan of the series and this film was more of the same which as far as I am concerned is the perfect recipe. Complex story, great visuals, action etc. Loved it!!!!!!
-
-
AnonymousMr.Jan 26, 200910the entire series was amazing.....the story is intelligent, amazing action sequences and great acting. Fills the gaps of the wanted answers.
-
-
BobYoungmanJan 26, 200910Good plot, all of us at the office thinks that is helps explain some of the backstory, although Kate is hotter
-
-
TomSJan 26, 200910Great prequel! It fleshed out some of the characters you had seen from the other two movies better and helped explain the past. I really like it. Underworld was great, Evolution was better, and I think this one was right up there.
-
-
YokikaH.Jan 31, 20093
-
-
jimbobFeb 3, 200910Awesome film. victor is a badass.
-
-
gurgoniMar 3, 200910
-
-
jessenMay 14, 200910Most reviews where bad i believe this movie really captures the concept that everyone can get along lol. but the battle between the vampires and the lycans is a good mix.
-
-
JoseB.Jan 23, 20099I enjoyed this movie even though I felt the FX could have been a little better. Great job Michael Sheen, Bill Nighy, Rhona Mitra, Steven Mackintosh, and Kevin Grevioux
-
-
KV.Jan 24, 20097it could had been better but its really well made with little errors.
-
-
JasonV.Jan 24, 200910Great film. kept with the original direction of the other two films. A+ a must see film.
-
-
CharlesV.Jan 24, 20099This is one of the best vampire/werewolf movies/series visually ever made.
-
-
AndrasG.Jan 26, 200910Great movie! Best in the series. I hope that they will continue the story from the end of that movie. Loved it. Can't wait for the blu-ray release.
-
-
RobB.Jan 26, 200910I thought the movie was fantastic. even my wife loved it and shes not really a fan of this type of movie. great action, told the story well, i loved it. for sure will buy it when it finally makes it to dvd. If you at all liked the first 2 underworld movies, do yourself a favour and go see this. you won't be disappointed.
-
-
EzraJan 27, 20099Very well done. Great plot, good acting, and not corny like the 2nd one!
-
-
MelissaE.Jan 27, 20098I thought it was an entertaining flick. Certainly kept my attention more than Benjamin Button!
-
-
ZoJan 28, 200910Very good film. I loved all of the Underworld movies and I think that the third instalment is just as good as the others. Michael Sheen is fantastic as Lucian!! A must for fans of Underworld.
-
-
RAFeb 21, 200910Better than Underworld 1 or 2. From Effects to scripts to acting.
-
-
JohnOFeb 25, 200910
-
-
CoreyD.Feb 3, 20099Very good story, very good acting. Didn't suffer without Kate. Really enjoyed it and hope they continue the series.
-
-
JayHMay 6, 20094I didn't care for the other Underworld films, same goes for this unnecessary prequel. All special effects, no substance or real point. Dark dreary and unappealing.
-
-
SamMJun 7, 20093Cgi was awful, the story overwhelmingly bad. not one good thing to say. underworld 1 & 2 you just cant compare to this trash.
-
-
CarlosF.Jul 18, 20096
-
-
KeithJ.Jan 24, 20096
-
-
[Anonymous]Jan 24, 20097For those who are following the bloodlines, this is a fairly accurate telling of the story we all knew. Sheen and Nighy are excellent actors and held the movie together even with poor dialog and bad acting by the other cast members. A must see for fans, not so for newbies.
-
-
MarkN.Jan 24, 20099I liked it. Script was a bit stiff at times, but a good prequel to the original.
-
-
eyeresistJan 25, 20099
-
-
MarcG.Jan 25, 20097Fun and entertaining.
-
-
AvidMovie-goerJan 28, 20097
-
-
ChrisVJan 28, 200910There was less gun action. Plenty of brutality still. Great special effects. More plot driven than the first two. I like both lead actresses. I think the Underworld series does the best werewolves. My only complaint is that William (Lucian's brother, head of the "animal" lycans)was only touched on, and I can't help but be intrigued by his story since seeing him in the second movie.
-
-
AlecB.Jan 28, 20097Easily the best in the series.. Finally No Guns or bombs or any of that shit.. Just vampires and lycans tearing eachother up.. Plus Viktor was actually a badass this time
-
-
MarkH.Feb 16, 20093Thorougly "meh". At an hour and ten minutes (not counting the credits) it's pathetically short, bland, and uninspiring. The third or fourth time they did a similar slow pan over Bill Nighy sitting on his throne for dramatic effect, I wondered if they were going to keep using that shot every time they wanted to make a dramatic impression. They did.
-
-
LoganEMay 17, 200910Excellent film, great effects. I don't know why the critics did not like this one. I personally like the first one the best but this fills in much of the mere flashbacks in the first Underworld. They brought back some great characters and tied things together nicely with a dark romanian bow.
-
-
mikekMay 26, 20098I just watched this and it is really good ..the story that was talked about in the first film is their plus visually as well and the casting was perfect though it had a slow start which is the only problem i had with it.
-
-
Mar 12, 20110I liked the first one. This one...well...it is SO bad that it really doesn't deserve the words to review it. There is absolutely nothing good to say about this movie. Don't they screen these things before finally releasing it ? Somebody, anybody, must have noticed that it sucks on each and every level. Simply appalling !
-
Jul 31, 20127
-
Jun 10, 20127It's a decent movie and it's nice to know more of the back story to the rest of the Underworld series. I love Rhona Mitra, sexy sexy sexy sexy. Pretty good action in this one.
-
Apr 10, 20137
-
Sep 7, 20124
-
Dec 13, 20115
-
Jan 19, 201310
-
Apr 20, 20135Certainly the best of the Underworld movies but that's not really saying anything because the previous films were not that good at all. Acting was a little on the poor side, The story is ok but there is no real plot to it. Action is a little below average and not that satisfying either. Overall, It was an ok movie, At least it was watchable, Unlike the other Underworld films.
-
Aug 27, 20126
-
Mar 2, 20137First off, this is the first Underworld movie I've watched, and for a medieval vampire movie it's pretty epic, and story-line wise pretty interesting. If you're a first-timer to Underworld movies then the ending will leave you confused, but it also leaves you wanting to watch the previous movies to understand it, which in my book is a plus. Watch it
-
Mar 12, 20138
-
Feb 18, 20139
-
20A needless threequel. Note to director: avoid 'rise of the' titles.
-
50The enterprise is sluggish when it's not grinding toward the preposterous.
-
70First-time helmer Patrick Tatopoulos (who designed creatures for all three pics) offers a satisfyingly exciting monster rally that often plays like a period swashbuckler.