- Studio: Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation
- Release Date: May 10, 2002
User Score
6.5
out of 10
Generally favorable reviews- based on 52 Ratings
User score distribution:
-
Positive: 37 out of 52
-
Mixed: 4 out of 52
-
Negative: 11 out of 52
Review this movie
-
-
Please sign in or create an account before writing a review.
-
-
Submit
-
Check Spelling
- User score
- Most active
- By date
- Most helpful
- Most Clicked
-
RichardJan 2, 20037Better than expected. Lane is getting the lion's share of the raves, and the praise is deserved, but Gere is equally impressive as he comes to grips with the reality of his wife's infidelity. Although the ending is preferable to Martinez jumping out of a bathtub after you think he's dead, it's still strangely unsatisfying and predictable.
-
-
AppleH.Jun 5, 20021Even for a porno film it was bad. No character development and a terrible ending. Not worth your time!
-
-
BrettR.Jun 5, 200210Very well done movie. Strong acting. Only once in a long while does a movie come along with such an impact, to where you leave and say. "I would like to watch that again"
-
-
LouisP.Jan 6, 20039A stunning and powerful performance by Lane carries the film from start to finish. A beautiful film from Lyne that radomnly echoes his career peak "Fatal Attraction."
-
-
AlexK.Dec 23, 20022I wonder if I can get a refund on a video rental have to ask blockbuster.
-
-
RobertH.May 30, 20022
-
-
HarryH.Jun 8, 20021Terrible movie that is void of any character development. About the only thing worth watching are the sex scenes. The movie never explains why Diane Lane's character risks her marriage and family for lowlife steamy sex? The method and how her lover is killed with Richard Gere and Diane Lane's reaction is simply absurd. A terrible waste of talent with a lame ending.
-
-
DonH.Jul 29, 20028Diane Lane's performance easily elevates this film above soap opera script and soft-porn style cinematography of this Adrian Lyne film.
-
-
HarrietG.May 2, 200310Diane Lane puts out an incredible performance. She deserved the Oscar. The entire cast is great. Outstanding film. Way to go Adrien Lyne!
-
-
PatC.Jan 6, 20047Diane Lane can act. Richard Gere can't, not really. But he wasn't mis-cast. No wonder her marriage bored her. Consequences of adultery without the melodrama, but in the end resorts to the body bag to tie up loose ends. Still, Lane should have got the Oscar. Spectacular. Loved her performance, hated the rest of the movie.
-
-
JCEApr 20, 20045
-
-
JerryC.May 11, 20028Good movie. At times a little slow, but overall very much worth seeing.
-
-
Steve104May 12, 20025After a fairly boring first half hour, film picked up in interest. A star-making performance from Diane Lane, similar to Sharon Stone's in Basic Instinct. Of course, Stone's ability is so limited, she was not able to sustain that momentum. Lane is considerably more talented and should have better luck.
-
-
LizaC.May 13, 20023
-
-
SteveM.May 13, 20022
-
-
SheriA.May 14, 20028I disagree with many who say this movie is just about the sex. There are other, deeper issues here...guilt, jealousy, obsession just to name a few. I thought the movie was well done and well acted.
-
-
DianeC.Jun 10, 20020I would not recommend that anyone see this movie. The ending was horrible and is not worth the time and money to watch!! It's a waste of money and talent.
-
-
KathrynJ.Jul 19, 200210I thought this movie was well done. It was a upbeat, sexual film.
-
-
DavidG.Sep 6, 20028The movie was intense with flavor and pizzazz. I love the choosing of the actors. They made you really feel the characters.
-
-
RandyE.Jan 2, 20038If you are into movies for the actors you have got to see Diane Lane's tour-de-force performance.
-
-
TylerA.Dec 1, 20040
-
-
AshleyB.Dec 1, 20040
-
-
ChrisW.Feb 24, 20048Diane Lane conveys superbly the inner conflict and anguish between passion and fidelity. Richard Gere the pain of an unfaithful partner. The murder and ending were not necessary, though understandable for the box office. Tragedy lies in the brokenness of Gere, which he conveys reasonably well. Mopre satisfying by a long way than 'Fatal Attraction'
-
-
MichaelF.May 11, 20029This is a very good movie. There are two MINOR flaws in this film. 1: The kid's dialouge wasn't great and wasn't played out well. 2: It went on for a bit long. Otherwise there are some amazing performances. It's really smart and powerful. Lyne's directing was really great. Overall, a really well done drama.
-
-
SantinoS.Sep 14, 20027
-
-
FarmerTedAug 12, 200310I tell you, I tell you boy that lady sure was purdy. I liked all the action. Made me feel like a boy of only 5. Boy I don't need Viagra anymore... I love this movie I went and took me grandson and his wife to go see it. I sure did not see them very much. they were both gone to the bathroom so much. and when they came back they were wearing each other's clothing. Oh those silly kids.
-
-
YoonC.Sep 21, 20036
-
-
CynthiaM.Dec 17, 200210
-
-
50Despite the Gallic source material, what we truly have in Unfaithful is a tasteful, adult-contemporary ''Fatal Attraction'' redux, right down to the mister's Soho address and the happy family tucked away in the New York hinterlands.
-
50Doesn't reflect anyone's love or hatred for anything, just a lot of anxiety about test marketing, which means it takes a nosedive when it goes shopping for an ending.
-
70The irony is, it's his vulgarity, this mixture of the gaudy and the glossy, that distinguishes Lyne, that makes his work identifiable and, when the story's right, such a guilty pleasure.