User Score
7.9 out of 10

Generally favorable reviews- based on 477 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Negative: 55 out of 477

Review this movie

  1. Your Score
    10 out of 10
    Rate this:
    out of 10
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling
  3. Characters remaining: 5000 out of 5000

  1. Oct 4, 2011
    8
    Now, "V for Vendetta" here is a great example of how graphic novel-based books should be when made into a movie. The story is deeply involved into the movie as well as the characters and their significance. Natalie Portman especially does a exceptional, outstanding performance as V's girlfriend (?). Must watch!!!
  2. BrandonM
    Jul 4, 2009
    10
    Excellent Movie, Best message and a peak of what may be a visible future for America. Watch it twice.
    • 1 of 1 users said yes
  3. Aug 27, 2010
    8
    This blast of subversive pop cinema is a thrill ride from beginning to end, and probably stands as the best film adaptation of all Alan Moore's work. However, the production is both propelled and impaired by the Wachowski Brothers' influence - the stylized violence is bound to be campy in a few years' time and the dramatic storyline is carried too much by actors with the same serious deadpan British accent (hearing just audio, I doubt I'd be able to differentiate the voices.) Still, in the end, the movie gives us exactly what we want - controversy, an awesome antihero, and a huge, giant explosion. Expand
  4. Nov 17, 2010
    10
    I thought this film was fantastic. I think that the way Hugo Weaving portrayed V without ever showing his face was a great testament to his ability as actor and Natalie Portman was great as well. The tone and setting is great as well and as a fan of dystopian film and literature, this film hooked me straight away.
  5. CraigAaen-S.
    Mar 20, 2006
    0
    V for Very Very Bad Film - As a fan of the comic, my opinion might be considered biased, but the FIVE people I took with me to the cinema had never heard of Alan Moore or V for Vendetta and we all roundly thought that this film was utterly rubbish. Don't be fooled by the trailer, there isn't enough action to provide half-decent entertainment. Instead the Wachowski Boys are trying their damnedest to be intelligent and they just make everybody sound stupid. There is a fine line between poking fun at the British and being completely patronizing. Maybe that can explain the good reviews of this film over on that side of the Atlantic, but I can't explain the good reviews of it that we've had over here. There is nothing to recommend this film apart from a mildly amusing Benny Hill type sketch in the middle. Utterly cringeworthy. I was embarrassed that I had recommended going to see it. Expand
    • 0 of 1 users said yes
  6. JordanB.
    Mar 20, 2006
    10
    One of the best films ive seen in a ong time, the Guy Fawkes mask surprisingly never gets old throughout the movie, V's character is original even though he echoes many characters throughout history, very fun to imagine and not hard to believe, gets a 10 without a doubt.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  7. RyanF.
    Mar 20, 2006
    8
    This has to be one of the best movies I"ve seen this year [so far]. It's great when an action movie, well, doesn't use action to move the story. Hugo Weaving once again amazes me at his ability to act any part, and he made V a very likeable character. Natalie Portman was pretty good, I guess. But as I mentioned earlier about an action movie that doesn't use action to move the plot, V for Vendetta ending action was executed perfectly. It also showed that V isn't perfect. I always love when a movie gives me the shivers. And that makes a great movie. Expand
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  8. NK
    Mar 30, 2006
    2
    Very dissapointed, most of the Anti-Bush down with America crowd will resonate with it and give it high marks, I personally thought it was rubbish, I was nodding off. One or two CGI scenes that were done well, the rest was just pretty poor. Too bad, I was hoping it would be much better.
    • 0 of 1 users said yes
  9. DanielC.
    Apr 1, 2006
    10
    Wow, just wow. This piece of firery entetainment did the impossible and gave a rousing action story, deep and meaningful characters and a point to their message, all in two hours. This movie grabs it's story with both hands, and never lets back. Although the performances are not outstanding, the directors have created a well following plot that gives justice to the original, yet still packs a punch. V for Vendetta is relevant today as it has always been, and V's monologues are humourous if not disconcerning. The detective work was also done to prefection, making the reach to the bottom of the truth so satisfying and entertaining. I ask the people moaning about this movie: What is there to complain about? This are ideas that PRECEDE 9/11 but still resonate today. If you went here seeking an action movie or a love scene, you are at the wrong place, instead you saw an inspired action piece with some political messages we should all hear. One tip: Watch and read the original first. Expand
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  10. CodyK.
    Apr 3, 2006
    9
    This was a great movie. Lots of symbology used in it. Though sadly a lot of the symbolism will go over most peoples heads. Lots of good references to todays world as well. Though be warned it doesn't take too kindly to religious extremes, especially Christian.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  11. Josak
    Aug 2, 2006
    7
    I thought the movie was a little bland. It had an interesting story and some cool ideas, but I thought the execution was off. Still worth seeing though.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  12. MichaelL.
    Sep 3, 2006
    9
    I really liked this movie--despite myself. I expected a dumbed down comic book adaptation (I'm so sick of comic book adaptations--is this the best Hollywood can come up with?) and was treated to a surprisingly thought-provoking and amazingy topical politcal tale. Great perfromances all around; Natalie Portman proves her multi-leveled "Closer" performance wasn't a fluke (and erases her cardboard "Star Wars" acting from memory once and for all). Critics may call the message of this film simplistic--but I'm thrilled to see a film aimed at a young demographic with any message at all besides "wow, aren't these effects awesome?". There's enough action to interest the MTV attention span generation, enough pyrotechnics to thrill the techno geeks, and most important, enough cautionary tale to resonate with those who actually have a brain in their head. A neat film with a wonderful mantra: People shouldn't fear their Government, the Government should fear the people. Expand
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  13. RobWheeler
    Sep 3, 2009
    8
    Blimey, there's some scathing comments there. I really enjoyed this film, maybe more so because I treated it as a work of fiction and didn't draw comparisons between it and the real world. A good storyline, decent enough acting, some fine visuals and some good plot twists made good viewing.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  14. Heather
    Mar 16, 2006
    10
    Awesome!!!
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  15. GeraldB.
    Mar 18, 2006
    10
    this is a great movie to see.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  16. JasonH.
    Mar 18, 2006
    9
    Probably the greatest movie of the year thus far...even though not much has been released. A great film that goes a different route than what would be thought by the brothers who brought The Matrix Series. Good acting, good script. A fun and intelligent hero movie which doesn't involve super powers. A must see!!!
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  17. JonA.
    Mar 18, 2006
    5
    Not bad, not good. I appreciate that the filmmakers tried to tackle some social/political points, but they focus on ideas that have been studied for many years. The plot, action and subtext are derivative of other films and books. V is an interesting character, though I don't know why he has to carve his initials like some others I've seen before...maybe we should call him Voro. Also, sort of boring for an action movie. Nice try though. Expand
    • 0 of 1 users said yes
  18. Mck
    Mar 18, 2006
    7
    Decent movie, but it's slow pace will mean many might not like it!
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  19. CharlieM.
    Mar 21, 2006
    10
    The best film since Forty Year Old Virgin.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  20. AndrewK.
    Mar 20, 2006
    5
    Politics really shouldn't even come into the equation. This is about rating a film. Was it well made? And the measure of that is whether people are entertained. Obviously, many people were, and a few were not. I enjoyed certain parts of the film, excited to see the characters and events from one of my favorite books. I try to distance myself from the source material when I see an adaptation, but I couldn't help thinking all the way through the film that it would've been so much better if they'd left a lot of things as they were. I agree that this was billed too much as an action film, and its really not. And that's not a bad thing. But to me, knowing the original text, I was dissapointed in the actual content and dialogue of the film. The "message" is not delivered in anywhere near as intelligent a fashion as done by Alan Moore. Few can match his talent. I tried to view the film as a piece by itself, but while it wasn't neccesarily a bad film, it just didn't do it for me. The only acting that really bothered me was John Hurt, chewing the misc en scenery. For the record, this is the director's first film. Someone on here called it his worst film yet. How can that be if its the first one he's made? I also agree with the comment that some scenes were "Matrixy." If you were at all moved by this film, I urge you to go read the original graphic novel, and see how much more intense and meaningfull it is. All that being said, and while I hesitate to bring up the political aspect, it must be addressed. I felt it was a little too obvious that they were trying to make references to our current political atmosphere. And that cheapens the original story. I know very little about Margaret Thatcher, but I don't believe that Alan Moore shoved any references down people's throats. This movie also might've been much better if it had been made pre-9/11, or much further in the future. Nothing that comes out these days can speak about the government or terrorists without being labeled as a statement on politics. Lastly, why are there so many comments from the editor being stuck into our own reviews? They seem to be conveying the editor's own opinion of our reviews, when this is supposed to be our way of openly expressing our opinion. Just edit. Don't give us your opinion on our thoughts. Thank you. [Ed: Well said.] Expand
    • 0 of 1 users said yes
  21. JudeP.
    Mar 20, 2006
    8
    I found it interesting and and although I am a lefty, I didn't actually agree with all the politics side. I felt the ideas were made with rather broad strokes. However policital fiction has always taken the situation to the extreme as a method of analysing them - Animal Farm, 1984,Gulliver's travels, Swift's modest proposal for dealing with the Irish famine. I think maybe this should be a double billing with Ghandi just to balance things out a bit. Anyone who feels that TV had to much of a prevelance should watch/read Noam Chomsky's manufacturing consent, before deciding how much our lives are dictated by the media. It was billed too much as a thriller and I hate the fact they showed Big Ben blowing up in the trailer talk about giving the ending away! Expand
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  22. Ryan
    Mar 31, 2006
    4
    Boring, long, and yet again proof that the Wachowski's are terrible writters who somehow fluked into the first Matrix movie. If you like little to no action, and dialog that is all exposition then this... still would be a bad movie.
    • 0 of 1 users said yes
  23. DS
    Apr 10, 2006
    10
    A great movie, for people who didn't read the novel, and amazing visuals for those who did. Gritty & good.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  24. CraigR.
    Apr 10, 2006
    9
    Truly brilliant. Great acting, a superb story and themes.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  25. MikeD.
    Apr 9, 2006
    10
    I totally enjoyed this movie. Also frightened me as it should frighten everyone. I see evidence every day of our society moving closer and closer to this very situation. Too real. I think this movie accomplished what it set out to do.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  26. JaeheeK.
    Aug 17, 2006
    9
    Its the first of its kind. I gave it a 9 because i was moved by it. Not because i thought any of this could become a reality, but simply V himself and his enigmatic history, and the power and intellect he posseses. V is not a servant of the people like other heroes, he is one driven by a vendetta hence creating a highly unique movie.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  27. GregA.
    Aug 22, 2006
    7
    This was a good comic book film with good plot and, unusually for such films, an intelligible script. But why do people want serious political messages from such a genre? Some have compared it with 1984 and Brave New World. This is just sad. Obviously it could be better (so could everything) but there are some good touches: the use of a 16/17th century Catholic terrorist as a symbol of modern freedom was nicely ironic, whilst the vision of thousands of Guy Fawkes attending the destruction of the Houses of Parliament was very good indeed (I am English by the way). Expand
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  28. AnonymousMC
    Aug 6, 2006
    8
    An intriguing political thriller, with a touch of Matrix gloss. I miss the Matrix trilogy's action, but this movie has a greater focus on its moral and societal ideals, a focus so great that the whole movie just encapsulates you. Makes you think we REALLY need a hero like V, with a revolt to match. A few problems, though: 1) V using torture to covert Portman? Feels a bit morally incoherent and pro-totalitarian, contradictory to the movie's goal. Offended me a little. 2) Action a bit light in supply, probably due to a constrained $50 million dollar budget, where as the Matrix reloaded had $127 million at its disposal. They do the best with what they have, though. And it's unlikely that rich studio execs would heap $120+ million on a film that preaches politics that threaten to cut their wealth, anyway. Expand
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  29. PatC.
    Sep 6, 2006
    4
    I give it credit for expressing its own art. Nonetheless it remains a political thriller without all that stressful intrigue and zing.
    • 0 of 1 users said yes
  30. HarryF.
    Nov 4, 2008
    10
    This is an amazing film, great characters, lots of action, but at times it is also very dark and political, and even humourous at times. You will like the characters in this film, especially V, who is impossible not to like.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  31. ZachB.
    Mar 3, 2008
    10
    This is by far the most down to the point movie I have watched.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  32. RacA.
    Mar 4, 2008
    10
    This was a readlly good movie! i recommend it to everyone!
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  33. MarkD.
    Apr 17, 2008
    10
    Acting, plot, and story are excellent. Ending tops it off perfectly. Couldn't have asked for more...
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  34. LD
    Jun 27, 2008
    10
    You people are crazy. Whether some people believe it or not, movies affect and move people. When I get done watching what I believe to be a great movie, I get a great feeling after watching it. And that's what I felt after this one. One of the best stories I've seen out of Hollywood so far. LOVE IT!
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  35. KristinaS
    Apr 6, 2009
    0
    The film won’t work for the same reason that Watchmen won’t work. Even Alan Moore who wrote Watchmen has said it won’t work as a film. Both V and Watchmen depend on one giant thing that no longer exists: fear of a nuclear war between the US and the Soviets. Based on the fear of the extermination of the human race, even an extreme figure like Watchman’s Oz or Vendetta’s V can appear justifiable. Outside that end of the Cold War fear however the source material won’t work. What makes this film junk as a film and as storytelling is that it’s explicit pro-Terrorist and anti-American, anti-Bush politics fly in the face of the reality: terrorists really DO want to kill us all; they’ve tried very hard; and have succeeded in Beslan, Bali, Tunisia, London, Madrid, Jakarta, Istanbul, Sharm El Sheik, Amman, New Delhi and more. Not to mention NYC and Arlington VA and Shank’s Field PA. The authorities don’t look like fascists but people barely able to cope with the onslaught of evil that leads to Islamic nutcases beheading 16 year old Catholic Schoolgirls. Hard to make those guys sympathetic. Hard to make the authorities fighting these guys the enemy. At a time when people risk their lives to vote against bin Laden’s terrorists intent on blowing them up, the film is going to flop. Big time. Why? Because what people see on the news every day tells them the movie’s politics and story is full of garbage. What’s bigger is the agency problem of Hollywood. At a time when more and more of Hollywood’s core audience (male 12-24) is bailing out for video games that give them heroes to be and villains to defeat, Hollywood is intent on driving them away. Guys want to be John McClain defeating the terrorists in Die Hard, not being one of them. If I were Icann I’d be pushing this film as WHY Time-Warners should be broken up; a big terrorist attack killing say thousands of Americans (we can’t be lucky forever) contemporanous with release and not only is the film toast but so will Portman and Weaving as stars due to collateral damage. It’s pretty telling that the best Hollywood can come up with is a big slap in the face to “Jesusland” and the idea that terrorists are bad guys, instead of making a movie based on Flight 93, the guys in Afghanistan, or counter-terrorist guys. Being explicitly opposed to what most of your paying customers hold dear is a good way to lose their business. Expand
    • 0 of 1 users said yes
  36. PepeS.
    Mar 13, 2006
    8
    Future situation, with a very good plot. Good performance by Natalie Portman. Hate 'Matrix' scenes in the movie...
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  37. MarcD.
    Mar 16, 2006
    9
    I love this film. Brilliance.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  38. MauriceF.
    Mar 17, 2006
    10
    The explosive V for Vendetta is powered by ideas that are not computer-generated. It's something rare in Teflon Hollywood: a movie that sticks with you. I enjoyed it!
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  39. JonH.
    Mar 18, 2006
    10
    I thought the movie was very powerful and extremely moving. Sure, the villains are evil to the extreme. There are very few subtle shades to be found - but it suits the story. The final moments are glorious.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  40. Hollyc
    Mar 18, 2006
    8
    The look of the film is excellent---visually they did a pretty magnificent job. The intentional verbosity works really well in many scenes--but sometimes faulters. The story, though I haven't read the original Alan Moore graphic novel, is ballsy to say the least (given the time of release) And Hugo and Natalie were fantastic. But I wouldn't judge this as some sort of call to arms in reality. The point being, all gov'ts can lead to fascism--and complacency among the populace is usually at the root. They also make some pretty good points about "terrorism" or rebellion---(namely when/where it's born and how similar it is to its creator) as well as media control-- none of it happens in a vacuum---or by coincidence. The action in the film is intermitten by some pretty long character scenes--but the FX fits well & by no means is as gratuitous as the #2 & #3 matrix films. It's definitely a film to be enjoyed in the theater (matinee prices anyway). Expand
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  41. CrowjaneTwentynine
    Mar 18, 2006
    10
    Gloriously overstuffed, daring adaptation of the classic graphic novel. Some fans of that may take issue with the changes made but I found they made the film a dystopia for our times. The actors inhabit their roles with panache and depth, with special credit going to Hugo Weaving for giving V character and emotional depth with no use of facial expressions. Natalie Portman will astonish anyone who's questioned her ability in the past. Yes, the accent falters, but the characterization does not. The film veers tonally all over the place and at times tries to do too many things at once but for the most part it is slyly subversive, rousing entertainment. Don't let the handwringing reactionaries or pseudointellectual elitists who have condemned this film prevent you from seeing it. You won't be able to get it and the myriad ideas it instigates out of your head. Expand
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  42. BonehoC.
    Mar 18, 2006
    10
    Normally I don't give such high scores to movies, but this one without-a-doubt, deserves it. It got everything it wanted to be right, and had everyone walk away with a message. I haven't seen a movie with such a moving story in years and so well presently. We always know who to count on for incredible epic films, The Wachowski brothers. I could say so much more, but the film speaks for itself. Expand
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  43. MarcB.
    Mar 19, 2006
    5
    An enjoyable popcorn movie with a very weak, sad, and ultimately unfulfilling story. This is a movie that cant be deemed important or deeper than it claims to be unless you are 15 or younger. Some good acting from Portman and a very suttle Stphen Rea. John Hurt is over the top creepy. Weaving is dashing although you never get to see him, but I couldnt help feeling that this movie was trying to make a statement. I ssues about the Koran and repression of gays, etc.. But how do they answer these problems? By blowing up buildings and killing people! Not only that but once the biuldings are blown up and people are killed(many through out the film) where do they go from there? A question this movie fails to answer and chooses to ignore. I couldnt help thinking how Osama bin Laden would love this movie's dim message and how Ghandi and Martin Luther King Jr. would be rolling in their graves. Go see it if you want to have to be entertained for a think free price, but if you are looking for a moral lesson on violence while be engaged visually, check out Munich or A History of Violence. Expand
    • 0 of 1 users said yes
  44. Sudhir
    Mar 19, 2006
    0
    Just got back from V for Vendetta. Bad bad acting (Portman's pretentious accent sucked) or the boring buildup; the really dull action scenes or the one sided cliched dialogue. And it ran for like three hours. Not to mention HUGE plot holes. At the end of it all I was completely disoriented. What's with the Tchaikovsky music, or the TV infatuation? Or the overuse of 'bollocks' ? If there was *any* pseudo philosophical symbolism hidden in the movie someplace, they did not make an effort to get the message out. Expand
    • 0 of 1 users said yes
  45. D.
    Mar 19, 2006
    10
    This is not a pro-terrorism movie. Read your John Locke.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  46. T.M.
    Mar 19, 2006
    10
    Amazing movie; brilliant concept, wonderful acting, intelligent, clever, and thought provoking. If this movie does nothing for you then I'm sad to say you're amongst the lemmings of this country; blinded by this sick government we currently live under. Oh, and to the user who said "Civil Wars in the American Midwest? Oh yeah.. That's gonna happen."..yes, because an American Civil War is just so unlikely...I mean, it's not like we had one in the PAST or anything, right? [Ed: in the Midwest?] Expand
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  47. RandiP.
    Mar 21, 2006
    10
    This was an excellent film. It captures the heart of the revolutionary and makes you full of what is needed to make this world all the better. I'll definitely see this again.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  48. CurtisJ.
    Mar 20, 2006
    9
    One of the most thoroughly satisfying movie experiences I've had in a long time. It entertains, it's beautifully made, well writtien,has something real to say about the world we live in, and doesn't cop out of it's convictions like so much Hollywood fare. It also does not rely on special effects for it's entertainment value. Where effects are used they are top notch, and the sequence towards the end of the film is easily the best sequence of it's kind that I have ever seen on film. I hope this movie finds a huge audience. Expand
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  49. ChrisS.
    Mar 20, 2006
    0
    The worst thing about this film is that it makes the ideals of Anarchism and the Libertarian-Left sound completely stupid.
    • 0 of 1 users said yes
  50. SverreE.
    Mar 20, 2006
    1
    Argh! Forget the politics! This simply isn't a very good film!
    • 0 of 1 users said yes
  51. ShellyC.
    Mar 22, 2006
    0
    I feel this movie skimmed the surface of several American political issues without explanation or justification of any of them. I perceived blame being assigned to the US for terrorism and tyranny. Had this movie's political agenda been properly billed I would have never given my money for such psycho babble politics. One of the "good guys" had a nazi flag with the Koran in his secret room. This movie was pure garbage! Expand
    • 0 of 1 users said yes
  52. JD
    Mar 22, 2006
    4
    Makes christians look like crazy right wing fundlementalists. Christians have been repressed to. Sure they don't agree with some of the things in this world but they're not as narrow minded as portrayed.
    • 0 of 2 users said yes
  53. MeyaC.
    Mar 24, 2006
    9
    This movie is really good. i've read the comic book, and that was obviously better, but the film is great in its own right. this is the best thing i've seen in a long time, and it makes you think about a lot of things that's going on right now. yes, it may be controversial because it talks about terrorists and maybe even glorifying them, but hello, it's a film. it's fiction. it's only a portrayal of what alan moore (or whoever wrote the script) feels or thinks or whatever. i just want to complain about a few things: where was the vicious cabaret? or rose almond? i wish they concentrated a bit more on the outside characters and made it an ensemble drama (maybe there wasn't enough time, iunno)more than concentrating on natalie portman's iffy character. i never really liked evey anyway, but maybe that's just my opinion. watch it. its compelling stuff. Expand
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  54. MichaelD.
    Mar 24, 2006
    5
    Entertaining? Yes. Smart? No. I was hoping that this movie would mix the two, but alas, it didn't. I'm glad I saw it, because it was a feast for the eyes. But not for the brain. It's thoughts are actually quite shallow, though at times exciting. If you want to see it, watch it in the theatre, but I wouldn't waste the time renting it unless you have a really sweet sound system and TV. Expand
    • 0 of 1 users said yes
  55. Katherine
    Mar 24, 2006
    10
    This was very good film! Unless you are a ultra conservative republican who would have great troubles understanding this film, this was very well written movie about a deeply flawed Hero adn heroine in a deeply flawed time. If,however, you are a moderate you will truly enjoy this film. It highlights the dangers of 'over-government', media manipulation, the problem of defining a terorist and many other issues very real and pertintant to today's world. I have read many review about this film harping on it 'glorifying terrorism' and for those who think it does, they have missed the points of the film altogether. The hero is a deeply flawed almost anti-hero who takes revenge on those who have destroyed his life and killed many that he has considered comrades by their circumstance being the same as his own. His revenge is mixed with his ideas of changing the world and become convoluted beggintg the question to be asked on what is justice and what is revenge and whether murder is justified. I have seen other reviewers saying it is attacking America, and yet the story is based in England about an English government. Yes, America is mentioned but it is not the focus. Very clearly, and on many occasions the storyline follows the basic premise: the people get the government they deserve either by action or inaction. The hero belives he will be able to stir the country to make choices again by removing the fear that has paralyzed them. A fantastic film that deserves discussion. Expand
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  56. Sara
    Mar 24, 2006
    9
    Thought the comic is better, I have to say I was extremly impressed with the film. Very moving, just like the book; I wept openly in the theater.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  57. Duhhhh
    Mar 25, 2006
    10
    WOW, I have not seen a movie this great in a long time. Usually when I walk into a movie expecting it to be an action packed blockbuster, and its not.... I usually leave disappointed. Not in this case. The story is incredible, the few but powerful action scenes are incredible, and Hugo Weaving as V..... I don't think this movie could've been done without him. I loved him as Mr. Smith but... this gives a new meaning to acting. How anyone can show expression and emotion without facial movement is beyond me, but Weaving does it...and it is incredible. Great Job to the brothers, great job to Weaving, and great job to Natalie Portman, as this is going down as one of my all time favorite movies. FYI, it is political, but its not hurting anybody though The government is a dictorial leadership and V is a "terrorist". Everyone has a different perspective on this aspect. I see it this way, when America broke free and revolted against England, it was heroic and for the good of a free nation. When V Terrorizes the government and sucks the people into his beliefs against a monarchy.... what is the difference, its not a terrorist act if it leads to a happy ending right. Anything that is heroic in our history books was just a glorified terrorist act that became a fight for our rights. Great Movie, Great Action, Great Acting. Favorite movie of the year so go see it. Expand
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  58. LisaJoN.
    Mar 25, 2006
    10
    I see some 75 movies a year in theatres and V for Vendetta is by far the most exhilerating and compelling piece of movie magic I have seen in at least the past year. The acting was incredible and pitch-perfect and the visuals were stunning. The fact that V was carrying out his personal vendetta while trying to save his country only made him all the more human. As excelent example as I have ever seen of Margaret Mead's statement to never doubt that a small group of committed and concerned citizens can change the world, in fact is is the only thing that ever has. V and Elie were those citizens. Expand
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  59. SmithJ.
    Mar 26, 2006
    10
    Amazing movie. Amazingly different and refreshing. I wish there would be more movies like this. It's a long movie but not a boring in anyway, even with not that much action. But when the action kicks in its really satisfying. Bad guys really are bad guys in this movie, and this movie reminds you how evil humans can be against each other. People should not hate this movie just because of its message or lack there of. Expand
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  60. AdanT.
    Mar 26, 2006
    9
    A stunning achievement, not only for Natalie Portman, but for all movies with a politcal premise...Gosh it's great.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  61. BrandonM.
    Mar 26, 2006
    10
    Awesome movie! It makes you think about everything and you will not know all the answers until the end of the movie truly bringing it full circle. I've heard the arguments about V being a terrorist, think about this in the US what did they do when they were oppressed back in 1776? Thats right they became terrorists in a sense but they did not try to stamper or control the ideas of other countries like what happened on 9-11. This is a story about citizens taking back their rights from an opressive government and it beheave you to keep this in mind when you see it "What would I do if a government told me what I can and can not do while they do it all?" Expand
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  62. [Anonymous]
    Mar 20, 2006
    9
    Seriously, its one of the best movies i'd seen in a long long while. One of the most memorable films ever seen. And trust me, i've seen LOTS of movies and am pretty jaded by trash these days. Go read the better critic reviews. They got it right this time.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  63. SamiW.
    Mar 20, 2006
    8
    I went to this movie, looking for entertainment and found it. Not just some sleazy chick flick that has a pre-written format for content but something that made me think deeply about government and people. The dialogue was amusing, and I absolutely loved Portman. The backround information was sketchy at best and the reason for blowing up parliament vague and more left to the imagination than anything. The movie has faults but I believe that there are movies that have a less entertainment value given good reviews than a movie that requires you think and believe in something more being harped upon because of politics. When I want to watch a movie, I check my politics at the door. Expand
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  64. MitchellF.
    Mar 27, 2006
    8
    I could go on with a lengthy speach about this movie, but after reading other peoples reviews, I feel that i cant do this movie justice without someone else contradicting my opinion about how this movie portrayed "politics". Its a freaking movie, for god sakes who cares how the politics are handled in the future of a COMIC BOOK! Just go see the movie.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  65. KevinG.
    Mar 20, 2006
    7
    The premise behind the film was excellent, sadly the film was to be foud lacking generally. The plot is sluggish and is far too choppy and the way the back story is weaved in takes away form the the current action (of which there is'nt half enough anyway). When the the action scenes happened they were good especially the ending knife sequence whch is worth the ticket entry alone.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  66. JosiahR.
    Mar 20, 2006
    0
    I'm dumber for having seen this movie. Incoherent, lacking in style, over-wrought pretentious dialogue. Like a pissed off teenager who can't get laid wrote it. Geez.
    • 0 of 2 users said yes
  67. TomO.
    Mar 20, 2006
    2
    Look. Alan Moore had his name taken off the credits for a reason. The original comic is a magnificent piece of subversive, political and social commentary; this film is cynical action fodder, pandering to the feeble idea that we the public are all 'good people' who rise up when oppressed by the forces of evil. Give me a break. Moore tackled issues of complicity and how fascism can be taken as a viable system of government. He created a piece of work that demmands introspection from its audience. This film removes any value from its original source and replaces it with another empty piece of 'entertainment', peddling the usual nonsense that 'good people' (us) only let bad, destructive people into power when they have been tricked. This film is a cop out on every level. Expand
    • 0 of 1 users said yes
  68. JoeM.
    Apr 11, 2006
    9
    Instead of portraying what the world (or more precisely, the American government) is like today, this movie warns of what it could become if people were to blindly follow the orders of today's leaders. It is a comparison between this future government and the government the Nazi party imposed on countries they conquered. It is also a tribute to Guy Fawkes and the power of symbolism. And the knife-play is excellent. Expand
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  69. Alex
    Apr 1, 2006
    10
    i have yet to see a better, more intruiging movie to date. V for Vendetta is now my #1 favorite movie not because of the action or the good acting, but because of how real this movie seemed. V for Vendetta was one of those movies that felt like it could very well happen. and, if you look closely at history, it sort of all has already happened. its definitely not one of those non-stop action flicks, but the action it does have is well done, with some very nice special effects. i HIGHLY recommend it. however: don't go into this movie expecting to understand every aspect. history buffs will pick up on a lot of the symbolizms, but the casual movie goer might not enjoy this one as much. Expand
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  70. SeanR.
    Apr 13, 2006
    7
    What a great movie! Everything i like about it has been said by other people but was anyone else really dissapointed by Natalie Portman's performance? I really liked her in star wars, closer and garden state but what happend to her in this movie?
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  71. DerekP.
    Apr 5, 2006
    10
    A satisfyingly potent mix of classics 1984 and Farenheit 451, with a touch of Equilibrium. A thinking movie I will have to watch on DVD so I can catch all the details and famous quotes.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  72. MikeG.
    Apr 7, 2006
    9
    Very strong movie. Suprisingly, it was more of an intellectual exercise than an action movie or an emotional experience. This is perhaps the lone weakness of the movie - there are a couple of times where a more emotional wallop would have moved this movie to a 10. Otherwise, I found myself sucked into the story. Unlike a lot of other futuristic, totalitarian movies, the progression from here (the present) to there (the nightmarish future) was extremely believable. Expand
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  73. PaulO
    Jun 23, 2006
    9
    "One of the best movies I've seen in a while". - I actually said that to my girlfriend as I was walking out of the theater. And I was referring to any new movie that's been released. IMO, better than Capote, Crash, or any other Oscar nominee from last year (DEFINITELY better than Brokeback Mountain). It's kind of a long movie but it held my interest until the end. Go see it!
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  74. LukeD.
    Jun 3, 2006
    0
    a quixotic piece of orwellian gargage. watching this movie is like eating bananas without peeling them.
    • 0 of 1 users said yes
  75. MohammedR.
    Jun 9, 2006
    9
    Excellent movie with a strong message. One can not ask for a better movie.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  76. EmeryN.
    Jul 6, 2006
    10
    One of the best films I have ever seen.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  77. RobR.
    Aug 11, 2006
    2
    This is a simple movie for children, posing as "art". It takes more than a 130 minute running time to make a movie compelling. You'd have thought that after the dreadful Matrix sequels, the Wachowski brothers would have realised that.
    • 0 of 1 users said yes
  78. ElizabethK.
    Aug 1, 2006
    10
    The language that V employs in the movie alone makes it worth the watch. It is definently one of the best movies I have seen made in a long while.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  79. LenC.
    Aug 1, 2006
    10
    Best movie I've seen in a long time. Intellectual and riveting. A smart movie with lots of action.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  80. AlecB.
    Aug 3, 2006
    9
    very good plot and lots of action.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  81. DaveK.
    Aug 4, 2006
    10
    Great movie! Great story and they presented it, I think, perfectly. A good action movie, with "matrix-like" elements, and a story that makes you think. Resembles WW2 nazi Germany. Natalie Portman was great too.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  82. JonathanC.
    Sep 16, 2006
    8
    It was better to me than the Matrix. It was very political but it was played very well. I think the letter scene could have been done better.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  83. StephanieV.
    Sep 4, 2006
    10
    In a country filled with "sheep"; I think this film was an excellent way to deliver a very pointed warning about the fear mongering and wars that are used to influence public opinion and line the pockets of the wealthy.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  84. CherylC.
    Sep 4, 2006
    3
    Decent acting. Sophomoric attempt at political philosophy. Actually, just plain stupid when all said and done.
    • 0 of 3 users said yes
  85. DavidH.
    Feb 10, 2007
    8
    V was a very good film, anyone giving it less than a 7, not only came in midway through the film, but is over critical of the great performances given by Portman and Weaving.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  86. CarlW.
    May 21, 2007
    8
    This movie IS thought provoking. Many critics caught up in the rush to elitism brand this as oversimplistic, shallow, and irresponsible. I am delighted to have an alternative to "The Hills Have Eyes 5" and "Saw 12" Evidently some critics wouldn't know shallow, and irresponsible if it bit them on the ass.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  87. Brent
    May 4, 2007
    10
    One of the best, if not THE best movie, I have ever seen. Perfect blend of action and philosophy and politics.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  88. ColbyS.
    Jul 1, 2007
    2
    I was expecting a lot better, maybe. It turned out to be a liberal, leftist propaganda vehicle first, story second. The only good press it got was from mainly liberal publications. Go figure. Beyond my disagreement with the beliefs expressed, this could've been made so much better, as the concept could've been riveting. Instead it was boring as all hell and preachy to boot.
    • 0 of 1 users said yes
  89. Dan
    Dec 6, 2008
    10
    One of my favorite movies. I understand why some didn't enjoy this movie, but for me everything really came together. The story may be "juvenile" in terms of politics, but maybe it needs to be so that more people can understand it. Moving, and politically motivating. Take the chance if you are on the edge, it really is phenomenal.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  90. PaulW.
    Feb 27, 2008
    0
    A completely farcical take on Orwell's 1984 with one of the worst 'acting performances' by Natalie Portman to date. Superficiality of characters, plot and politics and not even in a entertaining way. Special mention must go to the cringe worthy script with a fetish for sophomore-level alliteration starting with the letter 'v'. In short, the perfect film for a general acclaim and fit to shelve next to other recent entries in the IMDb top250 such as Million Dollar Baby, Children of Men and Labirinto del Fauno which most dreadfully shows the abysmal decline in good taste and cinematic appreciation which is sweeping the Earth like a virus. Expand
    • 0 of 1 users said yes
  91. DangerB.
    May 6, 2008
    10
    Love this movie. I suspect all the people that hated it get their news from Limbaugh and O'Riley.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  92. jamesm
    Jul 8, 2009
    9
    Great movie, great action, and many philosophical ideas and concepts have been used to show us what a future world will look like. LOVE the ending, it can be translated and taken many different ways.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  93. DrunkenMaster
    Mar 14, 2006
    8
    Please note the bad reviews are all based on poltical idealogy..are you really suprised? The critic for the New Yorker is an idiot and a tool...go ahead and listen to him if your idea of a good time is what passes for culture in the bowels of the rag he writes for. Totally ridiculous.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  94. ChazG.
    Mar 16, 2006
    9
    I just saw the sneak preview tonight... Once again we have to hand it to the Wachowski brothers for collaborative efforts in reproducing this great story into film... Expect a STELLAR performance by Hugo Weaving (V). The performance by Natalie Portman is more skillful than we have seen in the past (Lightyears past Star Wars). You should find the grammatically enhanced script during V';s alley introduction scene most enjoyable... :) I rate this film two thumbs up! Expand
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  95. JackM.
    Mar 16, 2006
    6
    Commendably subvertive and has plenty of ideas, but is marred by some suspect acting and pretentious dialogue akin to that in the Wachowski Brothers' Matrix trilogy. Still, a pleasant suprise and certainly worth seeing on the big screen.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  96. ChrisC.
    Mar 17, 2006
    9
    I just saw this last night and really liked it. V was so well done by Hugo Weaving that the mask he was wearing was not disctracting at all. Natalie Portman did very good after about half way through. I was a little pissed that they cut off some of the books elements, but the overall message was clear. One thing I did like more than the book was V and Evey's relationship with one another. I think it was more fully realized than what Moore wrote. It added an emotional element to the movie that it might not have had otherwise. It isn't as action packed as one might expect from the trailer, but the book wasn't either. When there is action though, it is highly stylized and very well done. The last scene of the movie in Trafalgar Square is breathtaking. This is a political movie first, action movie second but I feel it will appeal to a lot of people. In fact, this does have cult film written all over it. Good job Wachowski's, you have redeemed yourselves (at least in my opinion). Expand
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  97. AndrewR.
    Mar 17, 2006
    9
    The movie is not as good as it's source material, but how often does that happen. It was thought provoking and affecting. Very good movie.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  98. T.Pickett
    Mar 17, 2006
    10
    This is not a perfect film. But it does something that no other film has done in a very long time. It matters. People can, and will, dismiss the film and its message. It is a call not for revolution, but for living, for true freedom. The similarities between the movie and real life (i.e. crazy people "taking" power, massive lies to keep a government in power) are all the more interesting knowing the comic was based on the experience of the Thatcher administration and not Bush II. The source does not matter, the movie reminds us, or at least me, that living in fear is not living at all, and that real life involves tackling your own fears. It could just be me, but even if it is, this movie made me think, and that matters. Expand
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  99. JayN.
    Mar 17, 2006
    1
    Horrible movie. One of the worst from McTrigue yet!!
    • 0 of 1 users said yes
  100. DrewF.
    Mar 17, 2006
    9
    Very entertaining sci-fi effort. The highest praise i can give a film is "i will buy it the first day it's out on DVD". And I will. Portman is quite good here, but Weaving is absolutely fantastic. Even with a mask on, you can't keep this guy from dominating a film. The dialogue is topnotch. Can't say enough good things about this movie.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
Metascore

Generally favorable reviews - based on 39 Critics

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 28 out of 39
  2. Negative: 3 out of 39
  1. 88
    The explosive V for Vendetta is powered by ideas that are not computer-generated. It's something rare in Teflon Hollywood: a movie that sticks with you.
  2. Reviewed by: John DeFore
    70
    Viewers expecting a thrill ride might be disappointed. V engages in a couple of satisfying crime-fighting set pieces, but the story is more occupied with mystery and intrigue. Happily, it almost is entirely free of the hollow pomposity that marred the Wachowskis' last two "Matrix" films.
  3. Reviewed by: Richard Corliss
    90
    It's a terrific movie. I love the look and the verve of the thing, the confidence of its epic design, its smart use of half a dozen noted British thesps, lending weight and wit to the supporting roles.