User Score
6.6

Generally favorable reviews- based on 36 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 28 out of 36
  2. Negative: 6 out of 36

Review this movie

  1. Your Score
    0 out of 10
    Rate this:
    • 10
    • 9
    • 8
    • 7
    • 6
    • 5
    • 4
    • 3
    • 2
    • 1
    • 0
    • 0
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling
  1. Feb 23, 2014
    9
    While not all David Cronenburg's films can be considered masterpieces, this one certainly is. The special effects look disturbing even by today's standards. The story and acting are pretty good too. The only thing is lacks is a clear story. While it leaves some of the plot to the viewer's imagination, it still is confusing. But this still is a great horror films that you should watch. JustWhile not all David Cronenburg's films can be considered masterpieces, this one certainly is. The special effects look disturbing even by today's standards. The story and acting are pretty good too. The only thing is lacks is a clear story. While it leaves some of the plot to the viewer's imagination, it still is confusing. But this still is a great horror films that you should watch. Just not with your parents. Expand
  2. Sep 24, 2013
    10
    I first saw this movie about 5 years ago, and I find something new about it each year when I watch it again in the fall. Creepy, and makes you question everything.
  3. Jul 3, 2013
    7
    I saw it last night, and it was really interesting. The idea that snuff movies can make you get hallucinations, is interesting, and the speciel-effects is incredibly done by Rick Baker.
  4. Jul 9, 2012
    6
    Some food for thought, but not as much as I had hoped. Continually strives to take the plot where you're not expecting, which is meritorious, but unfulfilling. Falls short of greatness, and has dated badly. The future turned out to be a whole lot worse than even David C could imagine.
  5. Feb 14, 2011
    9
    If you fiend for a perfect balance of Fantasy and Sci-Fi, Videodrome delivers.

    "Civic TV. The one you take to bed with you." are the first words blaring out of the television in Max Renn's apartment - seeming to take the quote almost literally. Max runs a TV channel during the day and seems like he doesn't get much of a break from his duties at home. Max Renn, played by the legendary
    If you fiend for a perfect balance of Fantasy and Sci-Fi, Videodrome delivers.

    "Civic TV. The one you take to bed with you." are the first words blaring out of the television in Max Renn's apartment - seeming to take the quote almost literally. Max runs a TV channel during the day and seems like he doesn't get much of a break from his duties at home.

    Max Renn, played by the legendary James Woods, is always on the lookout for new cheap erotic thrills to broadcast on his channel and finds what he is looking for when he is called by an employee to view a transmission for a show called "Videodrome".

    Obsessed with trying to get the series on his channel, Max inadvertently reels in his girlfriend Nikki Brand (Deborah Harry) to it's bizarre sado-masochistic wonders and is caught between his want to know more and his fear in its meaning.

    Direction: 8/10 (David Cronenberg keeps pace with our emotions and intrigue as he draws us in)
    Cinematography: 10/10 (Mark Irwin keeps Videodrome seeping out of our TVs for the duration)
    Editing: 8/10 (Roland Sanders delivers once again, as he did with the Fly, intensifying every shot)
    Acting: 8/10 (James Woods gets help from great performances by Peter Dvorsky and Sonja Smits)
    Dialogue: 9/10 (Most of the time Cronenberg's script just wants to get straight to the point)
    Sound: 9/10 (Michael Jay does a great mix-down of all the elements and keeps them in-tact)
    Effects: 10/10 (Rick Baker, involved in "American Werewolf...",makes part of a uniquely creative team)
    Art Direction: 10/10 (Carol Spier authenticates Videodrome's creepiness with matching sets) Costumes: 10/10 (Delphine White makes it all work with simple 80s fashion and a touch of bad)
    Music and/or Score: 10/10 (I'm looking for more of Howard Shore's work after hearing the main theme)

    Total Score: 92/100

    The cast was well chosen and, surprisingly, suits James Woods perfectly.
    It really is an enjoyable experience and doesn't bore you with too much dialogue or cheap scares.
    So prepare to get your Fantasy/Sci-Fi fix and let Videodrome into your mind's eye. Long live the flesh!
    Expand
Metascore
60

Mixed or average reviews - based on 6 Critics

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 4 out of 6
  2. Negative: 1 out of 6
  1. Reviewed by: Roger Ebert
    Oct 5, 2012
    38
    The characters are bitter and hateful, the images are nauseating, and the ending is bleak enough that when the screen fades to black it's a relief.. Videodrome, whatever its qualities, has got to be one of the least entertaining films of all time.
  2. 40
    Never coherent and frequently pretentious, the film remains an audacious attempt to place obsessive personal images before a popular audience--a kind of Kenneth Anger version of "Star Wars." (Review of Original Release)
  3. Though Videodrome finally grows grotesque and a little confused, it begins very well and sustains its cleverness for a long while. (Review of Original Release)