User Score
6.8 out of 10

Generally favorable reviews- based on 26 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 20 out of 26
  2. Negative: 3 out of 26

Review this movie

  1. Your Score
    10 out of 10
    Rate this:
    out of 10
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling
  3. Characters remaining: 5000 out of 5000

  1. [Anonymous]
    Feb 1, 2001
    10
    Excellent! Really scary!
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  2. Aaron.
    Aug 30, 2007
    6
    Above average (average horror flick) in terms of cinematography, acting, and a very effective score. And there are some great chilling moments. But it gets pretty ridiculous pretty quick.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  3. [Anonymous]
    Feb 2, 2001
    8
    The suspense was KILLER. Just the type of movie I enjoy.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  4. ConradR.
    Jul 9, 2001
    8
    Eerie, scary, mysterious; doesn't go "right-over-the-top" like modern thrillers and horrors.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  5. HarrisonF.
    May 4, 2003
    1
    Too slow for its own good SUCKED SUCKED the only reason i giving it a 1 is because i starred in it and michelle phiefer is hot!
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  6. JohnS.
    Aug 10, 2006
    9
    What makes this movie great is that it's essentially a chick flick that descends into a suspense thriller. The scares and special effects are given in quality, not quantity, sprinkled perfectly throughout the plot. The ending requires you to stretch your brain a little, but the setup leaves you so desperately wanting a manifestation of the fears involved that you take it. Pfeiffer does an excellent job carrying the load, and Ford is refreshing as a villain. Expand
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  7. JakeG
    Sep 9, 2006
    1
    A stupid plotline really. I mean ghosts in a house? Ghosts going into people's bodies? Corny.
    • 0 of 2 users said yes
  8. GregF.
    Jul 24, 2001
    3
    I love Michelle Pfeiffer, but this movie just plodded along. A big disappointment.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  9. AndrewM.
    May 17, 2004
    6
    A good film but not as effective as it could have been. I think Pfeiffer is well cast, snug in character, but I'm not so sure about Ford... I love his films but in WLB he just wasn't convincing enough and I don't think he added anything to the film. The direction was strong and creative (good use of the water theme) and the cinematography was suitably eerie. The screenplay gets a pass, but not a credit. All up, a good thriller, worth seeing, but in truth there are better examples to be found. Expand
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  10. RandyJ
    Sep 9, 2006
    10
    A Brilliant first-rate classic. Mind blowing intelligence and incredible acting deliver the small blows. Sheer terrifying brilliance delivers the rest. A perfectly cast mind-blowing tour-de-force, stunning and superb. The greatest horror movie of our time.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  11. raVen
    Nov 3, 2003
    8
    (8.5) I liked it. The many moody allusions to water in its different forms (steam, fog, lake, bathtub, snow, etc.) are nice throughout, and adds subplot that one might use for a research paper. Having to cross water before the cell phone will reach the outside world was a nice touch. But trust me--the soundtrack is absolutely KILLER for driving around in the country at night!
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  12. Jan 28, 2011
    9
    A smart thriller with brilliant acting from Harrison Ford and Michelle Pfeiffer. Definitively one of my favorites. While focusing on the problems of an apparently normal relationship, "What Lies Beneath" has some original scary moments and much suspense.
Metascore

Mixed or average reviews - based on 35 Critics

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 15 out of 35
  2. Negative: 4 out of 35
  1. 30
    At once illogical and insultingly stupid, filled with dead-end twists and the sort of dialogue that makes a mockery of actual adult relations.
  2. 40
    Glazes over faster than a Krispy Kreme doughnut, and neither is very flavorful after sitting around for a while.
  3. 50
    This slow, derivative chiller (which lifts liberally from "Ghost Story," "Rear Window" and "A Stir of Echoes") wastes far too much time on red herrings and telegraphs its plot points with painfully obvious dialogue.