- Studio: Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Distributing Corporation (MGM)
- Release Date: Jun 1, 2001
User Score
4.9
out of 10
Mixed or average reviews- based on 8 Ratings
User score distribution:
-
Positive: 3 out of 8
-
Mixed: 2 out of 8
-
Negative: 3 out of 8
Review this movie
-
-
Please sign in or create an account before writing a review.
-
-
Submit
-
Check Spelling
- User score
- Most active
- By date
- Most helpful
- Most Clicked
-
BobH.Jan 5, 20028Had more than 1 good laugh.
-
-
EllieE.Jun 30, 200410It was hevay! I couldn't stop laughin, i was watchin it wiv my mum n sister, i think those others are idiots for giving it less then 7.
-
-
RobertB.Jun 8, 20015Even though it had a moment or two that made me laugh, it mostly just feels too disjointed. I like comedies, but I was just staring silently for most of the movie.
-
-
MaxineJul 30, 20014I thought it was a pretty stupid movie and a waste of money. Even though there were good jokes this movie was pointless.
-
-
PeroP.Jul 25, 20028Martin Lawrence is great, and Danny de Vito isn't as bad as he can be.
-
-
MariaW.Jul 16, 20012Martin Lawrence, in my opinion, is going downhill in the comedy department. This movie held some laughs but not enough to make me want to see it again. Somebody, wake up Martin!!
-
-
GilbertM.Nov 11, 20022You're asking for it with a title like that. I mean, what with the amount of imagination critics have these days, a title like that is exactly what they need! They'll jump on it like a pack of hungry flesh-eating antelopes, they will, viz: "What's the Worst That Could Happen? This. Film. Is." And they'd have a point.
-
-
40The movie turns into a cobweb of tricky spins and twists that seems like a hip-hop version of "Ruthless People."
-
16Maybe the worst thing that can happen is that every other movie at the multiplex will be sold out this weekend.
-
60Actually boasts a decent script with character development, a sense of pace and some well-drawn supporting roles.