- Studio: Screen Gems
- Release Date: Feb 3, 2006
User Score
4.9
out of 10
Mixed or average reviews- based on 89 Ratings
User score distribution:
-
Positive: 43 out of 89
-
Mixed: 8 out of 89
-
Negative: 38 out of 89
Review this movie
-
Your Score10 out of 10
-
Please sign in or create an account before writing a review.
-
-
Submit
-
Check Spelling
-
Characters remaining: 5000 out of 5000
- User score
- Most active
- By date
- Most helpful
- Most Clicked
-
MariahL.Jun 2, 20068I really liked this movie because it kept me guessing. The only thing I disliked was it wasn't as scary as i thought it would be.
-
-
PatrickD.Feb 5, 20067It's a solid thriller that will freak you out. Much better than Scream
-
-
BryceFeb 10, 20069I loved this movie! I think the ppl who r giving it bad reviews r just used 2 gory, disgusting movies! this movie was almost entirely clean with no sex-related themes, and the nasty minds out there just don't appreciate anything that isn't dirty.
-
-
ChrisM.May 17, 20069abosolutley gripping suspense/thriller. Nice to know I'm not the only one who dug this flick. Not to mention Camilla Belle's a real charmer.
-
-
ChieuN.Dec 3, 200610The terror is really great. It has a weird mystery about the stranger. Jill Johnson from the movie was very brave. The make-up and the hair-style are great too.
-
-
SeanS.Feb 25, 200610the best movie i've seen i know alot of people didn't like it but i thought it was very suspensing forget the critics that didn't like it they made it for the audience and i bet the audience loved it.
-
-
HollyK.Feb 4, 200610It was what i wanted to see. come on just the thought of someone hurting a kid is scary for me.
-
-
RachelM.Feb 4, 20069I loved this movie. I was wrapped up into it throughtout the entire movie from beginning to end. I will say that it needed to explain more because it did leave you pretty clueless. However, if you're looker for a good scare this movie's prefect, it rocks!!
-
-
ChelseaD.Feb 4, 200610It was soo freakin good and scary.
-
-
CalebJun 5, 200610Brilliant, very brilliant. The movie kept my attention and kept me on the edge of my seat as I wondered who the caller was and what he wanted. You always got the feeling that he was gonna be there behind her, but he wasn't. The drama of the movie kept me in more suspense until the very end.
-
-
KristenFeb 13, 20069
-
-
KevinFeb 14, 20068
-
-
JavierV.Jun 25, 20077this movie should be called "The Telephone" lol , even that more than the half of the movie the girl is talking on the phone this movie really scare me , don't know why everyone hate it but this is a good movie for me , is not perfect , but its a good one.
-
-
May 29, 20115
-
KyleL.Feb 10, 20062OK, ill admit, it was entertaining....but the idea sucked...and so did all the liitle girls in theater screaming every other minute...
-
-
BrittneyS.Feb 3, 20068Wow, I was legitimately scared and on the edge of my seat for this movie. While being predictable it keeps you guessing and was a very good movie and I reccomend it for any thriller movie fans.
-
-
JimJ.Feb 6, 20068It was pretty good. Much better than your average scary movie.
-
-
ShaneApr 8, 20060I absolutely adored this movie(on opposite day). It took way to long until the girl finally sees the guy. It also doesn't help that the movie was only 85 minutes long. This movie was a waste of paper for making the ticket. I hated this movie.
-
-
BrianL.Feb 2, 20062Spawns a new generation of film: Surivival-Boredom. Chocked full of red-herrings. In fact, for most of the movie the lead female has nothing to be frightened of; save for portentous horns and strings. Disparate camera work. A director in search of a movie.
-
-
MickJ.Feb 3, 20060"..................." This is what I predict will be running repeatedly through your mind whilst watching this piece. Well, at least it gives aspiring film-makers plenty of hope. What garbage.
-
-
RyanS.Feb 3, 20060This movie was so pointless. No suspense at all. Everything that happens in the movie, happened in the preview. So just go watch the trailer online. Don't spend money on this cliche piece of crap. Maybe if its a huge bomb they'll quit making horrible remakes like this.
-
-
DaveG.Feb 4, 20060Wow, this movie is terrible. If you want something really scary, go find "Black Christmas (1974)." Also, a comment to one of the other reviewers for this film, Britney S.: a movie cannot be both predictable and "keeps you guessing." Sorry. Please don't string together contradictory thoughts, and please stop writing anything down. Just keep it all in your head and learn a trade or something.
-
-
JoekoolKFeb 5, 20060Tremendously horrible. Everything about it was just plain stupidity. The acting, suspense were nonexistent. It will end up being one of the worst movies of the year.
-
-
TylerD.Feb 11, 20061
-
-
JoeS.Feb 4, 20068This movie was pretty good, could it have been better? yes. People say it wasn't scary, but it does have its moments.
-
-
GrantN.Feb 4, 20063
-
-
JakeFeb 4, 20063
-
-
RyanB.Feb 4, 20065This movie is the worse movie that I had ever seen but the reason why im giving it a five is because it is so bad that it is funny.
-
-
MattFeb 5, 20061
-
-
BrianA.Feb 5, 20061This movie would be great if it was supposed to be a COMEDY. Terrible writing, bad acting, and the main character is so stupid she deserves to be knived. Complete rubbish.
-
-
BrettS.Feb 8, 20060Someone tell me who's dumb enough to give a movie like this a green-light. Horrible, horrible, horrible.
-
-
MattC.Mar 18, 200610Call me crazy, but I loved this movie. It's the best of 2006 so far, in my opinion. It was suspenseful and terrifying and just an awesome movie. The only bad thing was it wasn't even 90 minutes, but hopefully they'll be an extended version like most films have nowadays. This film definetely gets a 10/10 from me.
-
-
JaxD.May 22, 20064The movie wasnt a total waste, I was scared a few times. But I got really bored really easily in the begining because it took wwwaaayyy too long to get to the final slashing part! Also, a few parts were way to cliche and I could see them coming from a mle away.
-
-
jackJul 15, 20061Wow. I can't believe I attempted to watch this. Thank goodness for fast forward; I reviewed this dreck in less than 20 minutes. There is no a single gripping moment, semblance of brilliance, plot relevance, nor character empathy.
-
-
AMovieCriticJun 3, 20076
-
-
CharlieN.May 17, 20061I jumped once, and that's it. Boring and not suspenseful at all. One of the worst movies of the year, and by far the worst horror movie of the year.
-
-
kayMay 18, 20061thsi girl is the worst actor i've ever seen might be a lot of suspense but damn think of it, obviusly no other celebrity would take it so she did ha.
-
-
MikeK.Jun 26, 20060
-
-
PaulD.Jun 14, 20072One of the lamest horror movies I've ever seen. Many red herrings that don't lead anywhere and seems completely derivative. Don't waste your time.
-
-
Apr 17, 20114Although there's still a certain degree of suspense present, this remake simply adds to the mountainous pile of remakes that simply can't outdo the original, no matter how good-looking the lead is or how flashy the setting looks.
-
Sep 1, 20117
-
Dec 26, 20110Its not scary, Its not suspensful. Its just a lot of pointless trash that makes you feel that you wasted 10 dollars to watch it. Its hands down one of the worst horror films out there, And imo the worst remake.
prev
next
Page:
- 1
-
50Designed to capitalize on the title and premise of the original but offers little to those who fondly remember it.
-
50A modestly clever concept gets indifferent execution in When a Stranger Calls, another bigger-yet-blander remake of an allegedly "classic" '70s shocker.
-
38Rather than remake the entire original movie, Simon West and screenwriter Jake Wade Wall have taken only that now-classic first act and padded it out into a dull, filler-filled feature that's remarkably void of any new ideas.