- Critic Score
- Most active
- Publication
- Most clicked
-
75A preposterous plot, but it's not about a plot, it's about acting.
-
75The Coen brothers might have done something inspired with this, but director Kanievska... turns out a more modestly entertaining little low-budget movie.
-
75The film never drags, but one of the enjoyable things about it is its way of taking its time letting us get to know and savor the characters.
-
75It's just another modest, unsurprising little heist flick. So why is it so much fun? Newman.
-
75A light, old-fashioned, likable film that capitalizes on the personae of its three key performers and a sort of playfulness.
-
70Coasts to a smooth, frictionless stop, but its star doesn't; he works as if his career depended on this movie.
-
67Ultimately a fluffy bit of caper-noir, the success of Where the Money Is rests heavily with Old Blue Eyes.
-
67I don't know that Where the Money Is would work at all were it not for what we, the audience, bring into the theater.
-
63A wildly improbable story that neither Newman nor co-stars Fiorentino and Mulroney, for all their panache and chemistry, can make much sense of it.
-
63The film makers are so anxious to please their audience that they turn the last act into a preposterous cat-and-mouse game that nullifies the integrity of the story.
-
63Easygoing and easy to take, the movie isn't much.
-
63Maybe this is a case of too many cooks spoiling a simple broth: The movie had four producers, five executive producers, three writers (credited ones, anyhow) and three editors.
-
60There's a caper and there are some laughs, but this isn't a larky caper flick; it's a pulpy little story that could at any minute go straight to hell.
-
60The romance and sheer fun that Where the Money Is packs into its swift 89 minutes follow from the sweet surprise that neither is threatened by the other.
-
58It's a lifeless little caper piece that never develops the magic and intellectual fascination it needs to bond with an audience.
-
52Hazards nothing to speak of and asks chiefly to be congratulated for its modesty.
-
50Newman's magnetic face isn't enough to raise this intermittently amusing thriller above the ordinary caper-comedy crowd.
-
50Leaves you in no doubt of where the talent is in what would otherwise be a throwaway picture.
-
50A forced, implausible flick that loses its energy as it tries to gain momentum.
-
If you haven't taken your mother to a movie in a while, this is the ticket, with its PG-13 rating, lack of violence and like that.
-
50With Newman, the movie emerges as a lively character piece with flashes of humor and grace.
-
50There's very little here that rises above the level of a competent straight-to-video picture, except that whenever Paul Newman and Linda Fiorentino are onscreen together they create something special.
-
50Utterly lacks the spark that makes caper movies fun.
-
40Lacks any layers beyond its own amiable inconsequentiality. It needs the spark of the distinctively American slapstick craziness that has distinguished Frye's previous work.
-
40The only way the film could have had a prayer of working--and thereby tapping its stars' considerable strengths--is by taking a much harder edge and going for dark, even bleak humor.
-
40The bad news? The story, which rumbles along like an unattended wheelchair on a gently sloping sidewalk.
-
38The unrelentingly dull Where the Money Is tests his (Newman's) legendary charisma in a way no actor could overcome.
-
30A caper film hardly worthy of his (Newman's) presence.
-
30Slips by quickly enough, but it never engages our interest more than passingly.
-
30This caper movie starts off as enjoyable guff before turning strictly formulaic and winding up as unenjoyable guff.
-
20Newman's charismatic, multishaded performance elevates the hodgepodge caper comedy a couple of notches above its preposterous plotting and self-consciously movieish texture.
prev
next
Page:
- 1
There are no user reviews yet.