- Studio: Columbia Pictures
- Release Date: Jun 23, 2004
User Score
5.3
out of 10
Mixed or average reviews- based on 87 Ratings
User score distribution:
-
Positive: 47 out of 87
-
Mixed: 5 out of 87
-
Negative: 35 out of 87
Review this movie
-
-
Please sign in or create an account before writing a review.
-
-
Submit
-
Check Spelling
- User score
- Most active
- By date
- Most helpful
- Most Clicked
-
SamJul 10, 20063Dreadful, disgusting, witless, and all in all unfunny.
-
-
Jul 27, 20120Ok,how can i describe this film:A big **** that was made by two of the dumbest directors ever ,i think that is only a way for you to like a movie like that ,it is simple kill your brain.
-
MikeY.Jul 3, 20040
-
-
MattJJun 9, 20051Right what i don't get, is i look at my fave films (donnie darko, garden state, fight club) which actually have a good story and a message and some people give them 0 out of 10, i look at this crap, and its got 10/10 by some people! HOW?! there wasn't any laugh out loud moments for me, an there was few moments which i found funny why do people do this to us?
-
-
CyroneJun 23, 20043LOL @ Ryan
-
-
DannyDJun 12, 20050Do not watch this film as it will numb your brain. Its not even funny and has everything you don't want in a good movie.
-
-
RicoNov 16, 20041What a waste! I want that hour and a half back.
-
-
LillyB.Jun 22, 20040Worse movie that I have ever seen. Should be used for torture in Iraq.
-
-
Jun 26, 20110It is truly one of the worst movies ever created, just another generic "mock" movie. Really all you get is a badly made film with equally bad actors, a generically boring storyline which can be seen in multiple other films which get released every year. See that toilet seat over there? Licking it will be a better use of your time than watching this film.
-
Dec 27, 20122This film is outrageous, obnoxious, and stupid. However, what keeps me from giving it a 0 is there were 2 laughs in that entire movie. Just two. Diagnosis: Pass. Guilty pleasure: Possibly.
-
AlfonsoM.Jul 8, 20040Movies like this shouldn?t even make it to theaters. This movie doesn?t even deserve to go straight to video. Movies shouldn?t make you feel like you wasted your time or money then again is the Wayans brothers and you can really expect that much.
-
-
MichaelM.Oct 22, 20044
-
-
SethB.Jul 3, 20040As a person of color, I was embarassed and deeply offended by this film. The jokes were not funny they were painful sad. This is for all those people who liked "In Living Color" and laughed along with it's minstrel show foolishness. All those who like minstrel shows, here's another one.
-
-
VinceH.Jun 27, 20041
-
-
PatrickS.Jun 30, 20040A film that doesn't just embrace it's flaws, but falls in love with them. it remains awkward throughout, but white chicks seems to hold just an ounce of heart that counterbalances it's visual sheen. It's politics may be typically subdued, but the impact of the remains as it always was: a film that doesn't forget to remember.
-
-
DevinB.Jul 10, 20040Insipid, uninspired, laugh-free junk. If you want "stupid funny," there are hundreds of other films more worthy of watching that don't resort to the kind of tired dreck this film stoops to. Worthless.
-
-
PatrickM.Jun 26, 20042
-
-
JohnB.Jun 27, 20040The Worst Movie of 2004. Absolute garbage from the people who brought us "In Living Color," the movie whose screenwriting is as unbelievable as the make-up. The Wilson sisters look like Michael Jackson's illegitimate daughters. There aren't even any points scored at the Hiltons, and they're easy targets.
-
-
MalcomJun 28, 20040This flick sucked big time. Lamer than anything I've seen and I've seen some turkeys. What were the bro's thinking?
-
-
AnsonG.Jun 23, 20063I have no idea how many people will be able laugh this movie. Its really funny but the way they talk was so unbearable and a bit stupid. If u really want to laugh this movie be my guest but for me it was far worse then that. Believe me, this movie will spoil your mind and inappropriate for u.
-
-
kevinNov 2, 20082This film was one of the worst films i've ever seen. The humour was awfully stupid and the whole premise was pretty much racist......can anyone imagine the uproar if it was two white guy's dressed up as black chicks???? it would never be made! also...while i'm on the subject, can you imagine a tv station called White Entertainment? double standards exist in the US today.
-
-
JoeH.Jun 28, 20041This movie is about as worthless as the gas that was constantly let out during this movie. It was slow torture as I prayed that it may at one point get better.
-
-
ElizabethJul 14, 20040It was a really thum movie.It was really boring because it didn't have no ,meaning to it.I saw it with some friends and ugh it totally SUCKED!!!!!!!!
-
-
DickM.Jul 14, 20040
-
-
ChantzE.Jun 21, 20050The most TERRIBLE movie i have ever seen. Rascism isn't my poblem with it despite the rascism... my god though, I cant believe I have to justify my hate for this movie. The hilarious Wayans brothers I know from great commedies have made me hate the universe, thanks do them I am now goth. For shame Wayans For shame.
-
-
Jul 23, 20110This review contains spoilers, click expand to view.
-
Oct 16, 20110
-
Sep 8, 20122This movie strives so hard to be humorous, but falls short by a long distance.
-
40Stupidity has worked for the Wayans brothers in the past, but White Chicks will likely test the patience of even their most loyal fans.
-
30Credibility, of course, wouldn't matter if the gags were good enough, which they are not. The film quickly falls back on the gross-out jokes that have made recent American comedies such a challenge to the digestive tract.
-
38Some film premises are so outlandish, so thinly worked out and so deep-down ridiculous that they wind up sinking the show -- and White Chicks collapses under a real doozy.