- Studio: Peace Arch Releasing
- Release Date: Jul 30, 2010
- Critic Score
- Most active
- Publication
- Most clicked
-
83The film offers evidence that Vicious spent the entire night out cold on barbiturates. It plants resonant doubts.
-
50Fails as a detective story, but it does offer an entertaining look at the punk scene in the 1970s.
-
40Ultimately, there's not enough material to sustain a feature-length film, and the sloppy editing, cheesy re-enactments and cheap graphics don't exactly make for compelling viewing.
-
40The eyewitness testimony of dozens of punk-era survivors and hotel denizens has a disorienting effect, and everyone gets sidetracked, though the colorful anecdotes are priceless.
-
40For an exposé very little is actually revealed, but as a neon-lit trawl through '70s New York, it's worth a look.
-
30An unnecessary retelling of rock's dingiest "legend"--ever get the feeling you've been cheated?
-
30An unruly mash-up of terrific anecdotes and terrible teeth, grainy film and garish memories, Who Killed Nancy? cares less about investigating a death than about vindicating an accused killer.
-
30Despite the presence of Glen Matlock, Steve Dior and a handful of other punk rockers, plus a slew of oblique eyewitness who lurked around before and after the fact, the documentary soon bogs down in tiresome minutiae.
-
20Simply casting doubts isn't the same as making a compelling counterargument-or crafting a coherent film.
prev
next
Page:
- 1
There are no user reviews yet.