- Studio: Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation
- Release Date: May 26, 2006
User Score
6.1
out of 10
Generally favorable reviews- based on 382 Ratings
User score distribution:
-
Positive: 233 out of 382
-
Mixed: 63 out of 382
-
Negative: 86 out of 382
Review this movie
-
-
Please sign in or create an account before writing a review.
-
-
Submit
-
Check Spelling
- User score
- Most active
- By date
- Most helpful
- Most Clicked
-
StephanieN.May 27, 20062It was horrible.
-
-
Sep 21, 20115The movie is overall visually stunning, but "X Men: The Last Stand", unlike "X Men" or "X2", is ultimately a frantic war movie that contains extremely sparse character depth/development and simple, lethargic action that fails to appeal.
-
JamesH.Jul 27, 200610It was the perfext way to end a series. I still hope for X4 though.
-
-
ByungSukJan 3, 20075I liked it at first but then I realized they totally destroyed the X-Men Lore. [***SPOILER***] I'm so sad that Professor X died. When I saw him explode in the theater, I was like "WHAT!! They can't do that" but then I realized that I was still in the movie theater.
-
-
Jun 8, 20123
-
JonathanH.May 26, 20063Very Good special effects, very bad story. I was extreemly disappointed that they made a movie based on a very popular comic series, but followed none of the mythology based on the comic series.
-
-
JonC.Aug 6, 20060Terrible. I'm glad I waited this long, but I still wish I hadn't seen it. Idiots! They totally messed up the series. There is so much wrong with this movie, I would hardly know where to begin. It doesn't make sense on its own, much less in context with its two excellent predecessors. It is ridiculous at best and jarring at worst.
-
-
MyAug 8, 20061
-
-
MikeR.May 29, 20063In a category with T3, Johnny Pneumonic, the Matrix 2, and Stars Wars Episode One. If you liked those movies, by all means, feel free to check out X-3. (all six of you).
-
-
SteveO.May 30, 20060I never comment about bad movies. I usually just let them be. I could not stand to not warn people about X-Men: The Final Stand. It was horrible. It had no character development for any new characters. Absolutely made NO SENSE at all. I hope Ratner's "last stand" is Rush Hour 3!
-
-
ConundrumMay 30, 20068
-
-
TarynMay 30, 20061
-
-
PatrickB.Jun 1, 20062Worst of the series. Should have been called "the Hugh Jackman and Halle Berry film" Very disappointing, convoluted plot.
-
-
LynnL.Jun 1, 20062
-
-
GaryE.Jun 5, 20068I bought into the anti-Ratner bit. I wanted to be let down, but found myself entertained through its entirety. Even through the cheese I found myself winching less than I thought. This is popcorn more than substance but the inner child in me said "Cool!"
-
-
JoshuaE.Jul 1, 20062This was actually considerably worse than I thought it would be. Poorly executed at every turn, X Men 3 was obviously placed in the wrong hands. Not even the terrible , but frenetic, action scenes could inject any life into the limp story and characters. There was no drama, no humor, and especially no brains. Brett Ratner is the Joel Schumacker of the X Men franchise.
-
-
BuckShotOct 7, 20060
-
-
JeanGreyOct 9, 20064
-
-
JudS.May 26, 20063
-
-
IvanC.May 26, 20065Flat, cheap, dumb movie, which lacks all that good ideas of previous and is an insult for those, who prefer to be entertained well. Looks like trash-movie, actually. Where did all the money go? And this after such brilliant X2. Well, i suppose, most of the 7-s the movie gets here would be from 'under 16'-viewers.
-
-
JarrodG.May 26, 20061If you actually know the comics and your not your average movie-goer dullard, your going to hate this movie. The movie is very rushed and it pisses me off that they take no respect in finishing a franchise that Singer worked so hard to get it were it was in the last film.
-
-
SteveG.May 27, 20064If you think Beverly Hills Cop 2 was an american classic. You will love this move.
-
-
WAKOJAKOMay 28, 20063
-
-
NeilV.May 31, 20064This movie was pretty poor. Horrible script and plot, poor execution, a terrible way to abuse the finest superhero team in history. A huge disappointment following X2.
-
-
JohnnyA.May 31, 20063
-
-
RIsinSonMay 30, 20065
-
-
jeremyW.May 30, 20063
-
-
MusicaliD.Jun 12, 20062
-
-
BonbonA.Jun 17, 20066
-
-
MelB.Jun 2, 20067
-
-
AlisterL.Jun 2, 20065
-
-
FabioP.Jun 2, 20063This is definitely one of the worst movies i've seen in recent times. The script sucks ass, characters are flat, dramatic moments are acted and directed so badly that they make you laugh. Then, the action sequences are just ridiculous, and the dialogues were so banal...i swear i heard many of the movie's lines in at least a hundred movies before. This movie is just stupid.
-
-
TonyF.Jun 2, 20064Really disapointing, halle Berry has way too much screen time, the chacters that have been developed in the past two movies are passed aside in this bizzare adaptation of two separate x-men plots gon crazy. Alot of oneliners is the majority of the script, if you are a true fan go see it, if not wait for it to play on tv, in like three years.
-
-
JoeG.Jun 5, 20064
-
-
scarecrowJun 7, 20065
-
-
jasMSep 8, 20061the movie wasn't as impressive as the first, the storyline was hopeless, it made no sense, and the young actors need to go back to acting school.
-
-
Cyclops1987Feb 4, 20071
-
-
ScottC.Mar 5, 20070
-
-
JackS.Oct 3, 20064
-
-
MikeMay 26, 20063This movie was really bad. The effects were cool but for some reason it all felt ridiculous. The plot didn't make much sense either. A lot of holes. The death of some major characters were unnecessary and disheartening. Finally, some of the lines were so lame that I cringed.
-
-
ChrisD.May 26, 20061
-
-
joshMay 26, 20062
-
-
LawrenceM.May 26, 20066Rater kills off character instead of showing character development. [***SPOILERS***] Two main players "die" only to come back at the end of the film. Too much corny action and not enough dialogue. X3 was a proverbial kick in the nuts to comic fans.
-
-
DavidC.May 26, 20062X3 is too absurd even for the X-Men universe. I have no problems with people having mutant powers, but having those powers doesn't mean they lack common sense. No one would ever be as grossly inefficient and ridiculous as this film portrays. Also, if you know anything about technology you'll laugh at how bad it is. A typical blow-em-up, shallow, waste-of-money miss by Hollywood.
-
-
NavarroM.May 26, 20065It doesn't work. Popcorn entertaiment with not heart. Sad end for a great franchise.
-
-
AlanO.May 27, 20065[***SPOILERS***] Has some high points sure but not enough to make me feel this was as good as the previous 2. I
-
-
EricD.May 27, 20063
-
-
RickyP.May 27, 20065
-
-
SuzanneH.May 27, 20065"the scene of Angel bursting through a window, shirtless with gelled hair, soaring over San Francisco, out-gays anything in Brokeback Mountain..." Chris D., that is the funniest thing I have ever read.
-
-
PonR.May 27, 20066
-
-
KalvinL.May 28, 20063This movie totally lacked the emotion of the first two. The story line was clunky and disjointed. At no point during the film did I care what happened to the characters, who seemed to have all changed for this film. Particularily Wolverine has become a sissy who cares about everyones feelings and when he does let loose and kill people it feels wrong. They can keep my money. I want my time back.
-
-
OrsonO.May 28, 20063
-
-
DanB.May 28, 20065
-
-
MikeP.May 28, 20061
-
-
AndrewC.May 29, 20060Quick capsule review: Piece of sh.., walk away!
-
-
ScottG.May 30, 20066
-
-
SteveJun 11, 20062Bad. Just really bad. And surprisingly boring.
-
-
JoshB.Jun 12, 20066To sum up, the original storyline is simply messed with too much to create a concoction of the strongest characters becoming the weakest and meaningless characters (storm) taking on an uneccesarily heightened role. Plot twists intended to shock confuse the audience and by the end I left feeling let down by the butchering of the comics.
-
-
JimG.Jun 12, 20064
-
-
JustinN.Jun 12, 20063
-
-
YoungS.Jun 15, 20065It started off well. With the flashback to Gene Gray. Then it just got worse until the crappy ending. The acting sucked and I blame the director. All the internet geeks were pissed about Ratner as the director, but I thought he would do alright. I was so very wrong. This movie could have been so much better with another director.
-
-
RayK.Jun 25, 20062A formulaic, uninspired, by-the-numbers action movie. Plot and pacing is awful, no character development, and audience is given little reason to care about anything that transpires throughout the course of the movie. Sadly, it's not even fun to make fun of. I very nearly walked out halfway through, but decided not to out of courtesy for my companions.
-
-
TonyB.Jun 27, 20063
-
-
EldonJun 4, 20064I'm not happy to be giving this movie a 4! But what a disappointment. After seeing this movie I watched my DVD of the second movie... night and day. The quality. Yes, the second has it's issues, but The Last Stand... it was painful at times. If only Brian Singer hadn't left Dodge.
-
-
RogerK.Jun 4, 20060
-
-
JosephB.Jun 6, 20064
-
-
EfeB.Jun 7, 20063
-
-
AndyFeb 13, 20074The mystery and intrigue from the first two films is replaced with a dumbed-down storyline and mawkish jokes. The politics and character development are sent to the background while the over-produced special effects are brought to the foreground. Basically, everything good Singer brought to the first two films is what Ratner leaves out in the third.
-
-
NaturalHMay 17, 20070It sucked balls at the end it had a whole bunch of mutants that didnt even use there powers they should of fucked wolverine and them up and they didnt even have all the x-men and how the fuck is professor x gonna fucking die DAT SHIT SUCK 4 DA DAYS
-
-
JakobKApr 29, 20096Nice special effects, but they killed scott :( that was really a breakdown for me. The "cyclops" is awsome. i dont know what happens in the comics to scott, do he die there too?
-
-
ZixM.Nov 11, 20064Like the Jean - Pheonix conflict it presents, this movies is so uncontrolled and raw that in the end it just asks to be killed. What happened to the atmosphere, the drama, and overall, the characterization? On its own merits, this movie cannot stand alone, and is merely hitching a ride on its predecessors.
-
-
SHADOWOct 17, 20065The reason I rated this movie not so high was plain and simple and that is because it does not follow the story line of the comic book. That is why many people feel that the third movie was rushed and it is awkward at times although I liked the eye candy but compared to the first 2 movies this one has gone of track.
-
-
MichaelAOct 24, 20066A dissapointment compared to the first 2 movies. [***SPOILERS***] Since when did they work on a cure? Too much of the wolf and storm. Plus there were many times when there was no action! Finally, why did they get rid of some of the best characters? Mirage and Cyclops! (I might not be getting the names right) I still liked the twists in the movie and the action they still had.
-
-
LaurenU.May 25, 20063This movie was so nonsensical, it was insulting. Why was this movie even made? Nobody involved in it seems to know.
-
-
[Anonymous]May 25, 20063
-
-
JeffW.May 25, 20063
-
-
NickMay 26, 20065Good visuals. Good effects. Shockingly bad story.
-
-
LeeF.May 26, 20063What a boring, soulless, crass mess -- I loved the first two so am crushingly disappointed by this version. Don't waste your money - get it from the library in six months.
-
-
ReelWorldMay 26, 20064
-
-
ArthurM.May 26, 20062
-
-
GaborA.May 26, 20063
-
-
DevonMay 27, 20063With all the good plots in the x- men universe they could have com up with something much better than this.
-
-
JacksonBMay 27, 20065The eye-candy is sweet, the action sequences snap like bubble wrap, and it's even shocking to see superheroes die. . . but the dialogue is fucking horrendous, the x-men aren't fleshed out, their characters aren't developed in any way, the plot is flimsy and what's worse, only the bad guys have any motivation for acting.
-
-
JudyT.May 27, 20064Just wasn't very good. Not enough story. Bad dialogue. Fights too long and stupid. A whole bunch of ridiculous death scenes.
-
-
CurtisW.May 27, 20062I almost peed my pants trying to hold it during X-Men 2 and left excited about the next installment. During the Last Stand was constantly checking my watch and didn't mind taking a restroom break during the film's climax.
-
-
K.H.May 27, 20061Absolutely horrible.
-
-
StuartS.May 28, 20060
-
-
AlexK.May 29, 20060
-
-
BernardN.May 31, 20060
-
-
VincentJun 23, 20061terrible. dissapointing. worst of the trilogy.
-
-
EddieEJun 16, 20080Bret Ratner ruined the series. He has no idea what the xmen are all about he just wanted some special effects. There was such a good foundation built by singer in the first two films.
-
-
Aug 27, 20115This movie killed the whole series!! The script was really poor, the characters were stone-cold, the dialogue was just awful and they killed off too many of the good characters! It had some good action and visual effects, but overall it was overproduced and lacked the heart and soul of the first two films. Big disappointment.
-
Sep 21, 20115The movie is overall visually stunning, but "X Men: The Last Stand", unlike "X Men" or "X2", is ultimately a frantic war movie that contains extremely sparse character depth/development and simple, lethargic action that fails to appeal.
-
Nov 12, 20124Isn't so much of a Last Stand as a last attempt to make this X-Men thing work. It doesn't, once again, and Singer's absence only worsens the matter.
-
JaredC.May 26, 200610Brett "the rat" ratner couldn't of done any better. I mean come on this is the dude who did rush hour 2!For me, it falls in between the first and the second. It was a great movie!
-
-
JosakJun 1, 20066My complaints are pretty much the same as everyone elses; bad script, bad dialogue, poorly executed plot and the movie was just too short. It really didn't feel anything like the previous two movies. The characters were totally stale, no depth whatsoever. Pretty disapointing, considering how much potential the movie had. In any case, it's worth seeing for a few, cool action sequences.
-
-
jrdMay 28, 200610
-
-
GutierrezL.May 30, 20069Muy buena.
-
-
ScottA.Jun 1, 200610Best movie I have seen in last few years. Love the storyline and the surprises. Great action sequences too!
-
-
TheShizzleJun 2, 20065
-
-
70Though the picture is not without its wow-inducing, SFX-driven moments, that potent X-factor is considerably diminished in Singer's absence.
-
It's a fast and enjoyable B-movie, though, and Hugh Jackman’s Wolverine brings some good stormy drama to the proceedings.
-
60Singer's absence is felt but not fatal. By adding too much new blood Ratner loses some of the original DNA, but with its nifty set-pieces and a few nasty surprises, X3's still a worthy enough sequel to ensure it’s no Last Stand.