- Studio: Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation
- Release Date: May 2, 2003
User Score
8.1
out of 10
Universal acclaim- based on 155 Ratings
User score distribution:
-
Positive: 138 out of 155
-
Mixed: 11 out of 155
-
Negative: 6 out of 155
Review this movie
-
Your Score10 out of 10
-
Please sign in or create an account before writing a review.
-
-
Submit
-
Check Spelling
-
Characters remaining: 5000 out of 5000
- User score
- Most active
- By date
- Most helpful
- Most Clicked
-
MatthewL.Mar 14, 200410Excellent, better than the first film...
-
-
Mar 26, 20126It's better than the first one, but this film comes to you with quiet whispers: " We made this movie to get money and we don't care if somebody doesn't like it......" No, seriously it's a good film and it has very impressive GCI.
-
Sep 21, 20117"X2" is a rare movie that bests its prequel "X Men" with stunning visuals, violent but watchable fighting sequences, and its ability to add new characters and develop their own stories.
-
May 16, 20119The first movie is good, but this is the best of the three. Good story, good acting and some neat special affects set this movie apart. The cast was really able to shine now that all the characters were introduced and the movie could focus on stroy. One of my top 5 comic movies without question.
-
Feb 3, 201266 points like the first one. It's not often that in a trilogy or saga two movies are same good - usually it gets worse, sometimes better.
-
NathanH.May 2, 20038It was really good, and it's longer than the first one, but feels alot shorter.
-
-
RandyBApr 1, 20059I loved this movie. I only wish it hadn't ended.
-
-
Mr.BillMay 10, 20035
-
-
ScottL.May 2, 20039Good effects, good action and longer. This was better then the first one because more action and stuff.
-
-
LeoD.May 2, 20039I like a lot, this one it?s better than the first part in many ways, but especially in how the characters are more humans at the time they?re look strongest and wiser.
-
-
JackMay 3, 200310Perfect! -- except for the last 10 minutes which suck.
-
-
TheElusivePossomMay 3, 200310
-
-
CarstenK.May 6, 20039Way better than the first part. Not as confusing and therefor a lot of special effects. And enough material for a future third part. A straight 9.
-
-
TimA.Jul 16, 20037It was good no doubt about that! I just wish .... did not have to end in that way!
-
-
FoxxeAug 20, 20039The first one was fine...but it didn't have Nightcrawler in it-Whoo Nightcrawler!
-
-
GaborA.Dec 10, 20035Condences as many mutants and plot ideas as possible from x-men. The result is that no room remains for its statements and beauty. More energy should have been spent on developing the message as oppsed to making it louder.
-
-
BrianK.Dec 1, 20034Got great reviews but I actually really hated it. Gave it a 4 because of some cool visual effects though.
-
-
PaulG.May 11, 200310Great movie! It's true to its comic book origins.
-
-
LukeB.May 10, 200310
-
-
ChrysvonS.May 1, 200310A rush of action, art and mutants. Im a fan of xmen and i have to say that im pleased and proud to see such a movie based on my favourite characters, to a point of pity for those who hasnt being on the xmen wave.
-
-
SaintHarryMay 18, 20037An improvement of the 1st X-Men. Hugh Jackman gets better and better and meaner as Wolverine. I must say the ending is a TOTAL RIPOFF of "Star Trek II"! Think that ending with Spock's demise to X2's final scenes with a mutant's farewell only to (possibly) comeback. It's a copycat to me. I dunno what Bryan Singer was thinking.
-
-
WolverRineMay 2, 20032This outing has a substandard plot, weak character development, too many mutants, too much shoddy CGI and is an EFX crammed sequel that does not live up to its predecessor. The pacing offers little surprises and it quickly becomes a predictable affair. See the original movie which is much better than this turd.
-
-
JoeMay 23, 20037I admire this movie. In terms of thrills, X2 delivers so efficiently. The pacing, fight sequence, and a hint of characters and story, it's calibrated extremely well. It does feel like a middle movie though, kind of starting and stopping. And it can only delve into characters a little bit, with 20-something mutants and haters on screen. But this is definitely better then the first one.
-
-
BansheeMay 3, 20039Everything I wanted to say did the guys below. It's simply the best sequel of our time and the best comic adaptation since the Burton Batman-Movies. I can hardly await the rise of the Phoenix...
-
-
ChadS.May 3, 20037"X2: X-Men United" delivers what you'd expect in a summer blockbuster; a satisfying story, not being one of them. But there's enough special effects, action scenes and a modicum of humor to distract you from caring; still, a little art wouldn't be fatal to the agenda of making a kazillion dollars. How the Wolverine met Rogue was a very impressive sequence in the first movie.
-
-
KeithS.May 4, 20039This movie rocked!
-
-
JoviMay 4, 20038THis is what a comic book based movie should be. Not watered down or "kiddie-fied" to sell toys. This kicked ass all around. A nice combination of sfx, humor, drama, and action help establish this film as one of those few sequal films that turn out to be better than their predecessor. Warner Bros. should take a pager from Fox and learn from it!!! X-Men all the way!!!
-
-
KatrinaD.May 5, 20039Where to begin? This movie amazed me, astounded me and definitely surpassed the original. I would say that it was an 8 overall, but I had to add an extra point for the fantastic performance of Cumming as Nightcrawler. Awesome! It was really going out on a limb to put a religiously affiliated character in the movie, but he pulled it off really well. I plan to buy this when it comes out on video.
-
-
PaliKMay 5, 200310
-
-
JoeS.May 5, 200310If you enjoy any super hero type movie, or used to enjoy reading comic books as a kid then you will love this movie!
-
-
SimonG.May 6, 200310Magneto and Mystique rule!! What a movie!!!
-
-
DanC.May 7, 200310Building of the success of the original movie, everyone seems more comfortable this timearound and each character comes into their own. Special acclaim must be paid to Famke Janssen who proves that although the X-Men are not superheroes, there are still heroes among them.
-
-
PeteGMay 8, 200310this movie rocks! if you liked the first one, this one is ten times better. much more action. introduction of new mutants familiar to those who followed the comics. an overall great movie!
-
-
MikeR.May 8, 200310This movie was great; I think the reviewers are trying to be "important" by giving it lackluster reviews. I am not sure what more you could ask from the film; it's fun, it's exciting, and wolverine kicks serious tail.
-
-
brainiac68xJun 1, 200310Just saw the flick for the 2nd time today -- i LOVE this movie... the x-world is totally cool and totally engaging... i dunno whether i wanna be a part of magneto's world or that of professor x -- BUT that makes this movie the only one i want to see for a 3rd time...
-
-
AnonymousguyJun 1, 200310
-
-
DaveC.Jul 15, 20034
-
-
ZackO.Dec 8, 200310What a great movie. The plot was pretty cool, and the action was more intense. The FX were pretty awesome too. The only thing was that it got a little wierd towards the end. and they never showed wat happened to pyro!
-
-
KatieP.Dec 8, 200310A really good movie. Better than the first. Some things left me confused.
-
-
GregM.May 10, 20038
-
-
NickV.May 12, 20039Good movie with all the mutants with their powers. Better than the first movie in my opinion. Thought that the length helped the movie. And they did not hold back when it came to killings and tragic deaths.
-
-
KevinW.May 13, 200310Excellent comic book adapation that does more than blow your mind with fantastic special effect, but manages to lull you in with its wonderfuly complex characters and timly release.
-
-
ScottM.May 14, 20038I liked this movie but I dont think I will watch it again. It was good especially for a super hero movie (which since to Daredevil isnt getting good reps these days) But the length was loong.
-
-
WuonmMay 15, 20037Very long, very slooooow and Halle Berry doesnt appears naked as usual :( can you believe that?
-
-
MichaelEllisMay 16, 20039
-
-
BlancoA.May 19, 20039Beats the hell out of Matrix: Reloaded. Also, better than the original. Many props to the makers of this movie for expanding Jean Gray's role. I'm definitely looking forward to X3: Reunited & It Feels So Good.
-
-
JamesS.May 2, 20035It was half as good as the first one so I give it a five. The action was okay, but Hugh Jackman is getting less attractive now that he's older. Also Patrick Stewart was better in Star Trek.
-
-
RickJ.G.May 2, 20035
-
-
WACKOJACKOMay 21, 200310
-
-
AdamE.May 21, 20037Very entertaining with some inspired scenes and great performance from Hugh Jackman and Brian Cox makes this film brilliant , action-packed and very watchable even though it lacks a bit of humour . Looking forward to X3!
-
-
HadesMay 2, 200310
-
-
[Anonymous]May 2, 200310
-
-
JonC.May 2, 20039
-
-
MehdiT.May 21, 20038I goota say that I completely enjoyed this sequel. it was everything X-men fans wanted. I was also so sweet to see Wolverine go berserk. By the way , the ending is not at all a TOTAL RIPOFF of Strar Trek 2 saint harry. it was so similar to that DARK PHONIX saga, you fool!
-
-
RyanFMay 2, 20039
-
-
JasonP.May 5, 200310The action is top-notch, the dialogue is witty, and the new characters kick ass. The references to future characters and storylines makes you want to see the third one right away. It's made my all time top 10.
-
-
MichelleP.May 7, 20032
-
-
AaronF.May 7, 20038
-
-
PeteP.May 8, 20038
-
-
AenimaJun 18, 20038Great movie. The first viewing is a charm, but after that, it's hard to watch the movie again because you realize that it not only drags on in some areas, but some of it is just cheesy. I won't go into details but aside from that, it is a great must-see movie for action and X-Men fans.
-
-
AndrewA.Jul 18, 200310This movie is excellent. everything is good in this move. Best movie i have seen in awhile. Nightcrawller is the best!
-
-
GeraldJul 2, 20038Great movie. Go and see it.
-
-
AMSep 18, 200310This sequel is better than it's predecessor. Less time is spent introducing characters etc. The story is interesting and the action is more intense.
-
-
BenA.Jan 7, 20047This movie was enjoyable even without seeing the original. Not perfect, but enjoyable.
-
-
JamieS.Apr 23, 200410Great. One of the best movies I've seen, and definitely better than the first one. Much, much better than Spider-man as well. Electrifying ending! Great film!!!
-
-
YoonMinC.May 11, 20045
-
-
SamJul 14, 20059Has its flaws, but is overall a wonderfully entertaining film, and gets me excited for the 3rd one and the wolverine spin-off.
-
-
JerkGuyOct 1, 20072
-
-
MelissameDec 8, 20037Good action flick. A couple of irritating contradictions, but all-in-all fun.
-
-
DarrylF.May 29, 20038It was really good to see in this movie that the actors could put trust into eachother throughout the movie.it is a lesson for people in our world that they shouldnt have to trust just a select few in our world.
-
-
BitBurnSep 22, 20037More like 7.5 actually. Good stuff. Great sequel. I really liked it!! If you liked the first one you'll love this one as much.
-
-
MatthewL.Mar 14, 200410Excellent, better than the first film...
-
-
ChristineJul 19, 200410I think it was way better tn the first one, and I enjoyed watching it.
-
-
NoelT.Dec 16, 20037
-
-
Nov 7, 20108like the first movie, its also great
-
Jun 17, 20119
-
Jun 8, 20117This film stands as a 2 hour filler spot between films one and three. The point of the second movie as well as the plot and character development are completely bone dry. Even with all this said the film stands as one of the better super hero sequels of modern day. X-Men First Class it theaters 45 minutes ago.
-
Aug 27, 20116
-
Sep 21, 20117"X2" is a rare movie that bests its prequel "X Men" with stunning visuals, violent but watchable fighting sequences, and its ability to add new characters and develop their own stories.
-
Nov 23, 20118Everything about the first film got better with the sequel, the acting is great, the storyline is great, the CGi is still looking quite good. The best of the X-Men trilogy easily.
-
Dec 6, 20116Eh it was ok. About as good as the first film. Acting is average, The story is a little bit better. Overall its ok but its not as good as it could have been.
-
May 28, 201210Nice.
prev
next
Page:
- 1
-
83It also boosts the punch of the movie that so many of its action scenes evoke the Iraqi War news footage of the past month, and the "X-Men" premise -- people persecuted because their difference makes them seem threatening -- carries even more relevancy and weight than it did three years ago.
-
67An engaging spectacle of energy and special effects built around a doomy mood and an ensemble cast vigorously pursuing a story line that isn't nearly as snazzy as the dressing.
-
80My chief complaint is that these mutants are a little--well, vanilla. I wish the X-Men had a touch of kinkiness to go with their weird abilities.