- Critic Score
- Most active
- Publication
- Most clicked
-
25A dreary experience.
-
38I found the most extreme material to be so tasteless that it voided all comedy.
-
67This is just silliness run mildly wild.
-
75Year One has one joke, but it's a good one, played for many variations over the course of an often very funny comedy.
-
25Any good will the movie generates, though, is grated right back off by Black, whose obnoxiousness has lost whatever charm it once possessed.
-
20The only people who should be peeved enough to raise hell about Year One are the viewers who had to pay to sit through it.
-
50The humor, largely centered around bodily functions and bathroom habits, is almost exclusively sophomoric.
-
20Creatively it's a giant step backwards.
-
50Year One is not really THAT bad and not ENTIRELY without laughs.
-
33The people who made Year One seem to think that all you have to do to make a hit comedy is get a bunch of jokesters together. But where are the jokes?
-
63It's the knockabout biblical lark Mel Brooks never got around to making.
-
25Perhaps the best that can be said for Year One is that it aims low and hits the mark.
-
63At best it's a bit like Mel Brooks' "The History of the World Part I" (except Ramis stops somewhere in Genesis); at worst it's like a Scary Movie-type parody of John Huston's "The Bible."
-
30Year One sets prehistoric comedy back at least 20 years.
-
38Its script isn't worth the papyrus it's inscribed on.
-
80A thoroughly, sometimes gaggingly broad and sly conceptual laugh-in.
-
20During all of the film’s oh-so-long 97 minutes, Year One, barely earns a snicker.
-
30A lowbrow, only fitfully amusing comedy.
-
40A lot of comedic talent founders in this new Harold Ramis comedy that doesn't exactly recall his glory days of "Caddyshack" and "Groundhog Day."
-
50Lacks seismic guffaws but elicits many mild smiles.
-
10This is shtick that’s minimally a generation past its expiration date.
-
63Dopey but resourceful yukfest.
-
40Unless you pine for second-tier Mel Brooks, you'll find more laughs in the Old Testament itself.
-
12We loved this movie the first three times we saw it, when it was called "Life of Brian," "Wholly Moses," and "History of the World Part 1."
-
50I have a certain affection for this movie, if only because of its conceptual simplicity.
-
There is no real plot either; instead the narrative seems designed to get this prehistoric pair from one funny sketch to the next, which sometimes works and sometimes doesn't.
-
Unbearably painful from shrugging start to outtakes-laden finish, Harold Ramis’ half-assed, hare-brained return to writing and directing makes Mel Brooks’ equally muddled, soporific "History of the World, Part 1" look downright majestic by comparison.
-
Year One isn't dreadful; it just isn't nearly as funny as it hopes to be.