- Studio: Columbia Pictures
- Release Date: Jun 19, 2009
User Score
4.6
out of 10
Mixed or average reviews- based on 114 Ratings
User score distribution:
-
Positive: 47 out of 114
-
Mixed: 20 out of 114
-
Negative: 47 out of 114
Review this movie
-
Your Score10 out of 10
-
Please sign in or create an account before writing a review.
-
-
Submit
-
Check Spelling
-
Characters remaining: 5000 out of 5000
- User score
- Most active
- By date
- Most helpful
- Most Clicked
-
Dec 31, 20113It was kind of funny, but it was also full of gross, unnecessary dialogue. Overall, it was O.K., but I am giving it a 3 out of disgust. One of Jack Black, the #1 comedian in the world's weakest movies.
-
PatHunleyJun 21, 20090
-
-
EricH.Jun 19, 20095
-
-
NikkiN.Jun 21, 20094It had it's funny moments but for the most part Year One just dragged on. It seemed like they were aiming for a plot but missed entirely. They do have sum good comedians n this movie but they cant bring comedy 2 a poorly written script. it wud've looked better if they wud've just ad libbed and improved the whole movie...That wud've been worth seeing.
-
-
XouX.Jun 20, 20097
-
-
RickJun 20, 200910This is an example of don't trust the critics. I just saw this movie a few hours ago, and couldn't stop laughing. The entire theater seemed to be in agreement as at times the laughter was drowning out the lines. GREAT comedic movie.
-
-
BrodeeKJul 11, 20099
-
-
JamesMJul 6, 20099This movie is so funny I laughed my pants off my thought is that Michael Cera was better than Jack Black I would say this is a great summer comedy.
-
-
BrendanJun 21, 20091I love Michael Cera. jack black's funny when he's not way over the top. the previews were promising, but this movie was just not funny. nearly all the jokes were just pathetic attempts at a laugh... the script could have been written by a 3rd grader. if you really thought this movie was funny, you're just not smart.
-
-
BenjyE.Jun 20, 20092Thoroughly disappointing.
-
-
williamwJun 24, 20092Jack Black - funny actor. Michael Cera - devoid of humour, charisma and charm. Jokes - ok'ish, but mostly flat.
-
-
RoseHJul 14, 200910I thought that this movie was hilarious and the actors were the icing on the cake. I didn't think that Jack Black was very funny but Michael Cera was very comical and the pure stupidity of the movie was hysterical!
-
-
dragonpenchantJul 1, 20092Even if you love cera or black (i usually dig both) resist the temptation to see Year One. it's boring and not at all funny. these guys should be ashamed.
-
-
DianaM.Aug 10, 20090I love Jack Black but this was the worst movie ever! Walked out in the middle--just a horrible movie!
-
-
JacobEAug 5, 20094This movie would've gotten a better score from most critics if there was actually a plot in it. It seemed to have a large amount of potential, but overall falls flat. If you want to watch a decent comedy with promising actorscomedians, watch Funny People.
-
-
JakeK.Sep 9, 20090I cant believe this is still in theaters i could do a play in my back yard thats better than this!
-
-
ChrisG.Nov 10, 20097While nothing special, this movie moves along nicely and provides some good laughs provided that one (a) like this sort of mindless movies (b) is in the mood for some light entertainment.
-
-
JesseBOct 13, 20093Very disappointing. I like Black and Cera, but it just wasn't funny.
-
-
RyanS.Oct 9, 20093Jack Black was kind of funny, but the rest of this was garbage. Way too much unfunny biblical stuff, too.
-
-
EDJun 19, 20096Not especially funny. It had some gross parts which were entirely unnecessary. I give it a 6 because it makes basic digs at religion.
-
-
CamilleJun 21, 20097Is this movie really, really stupid? Yes, absolutely. I expected as much. But I did not expect to laugh and enjoy it as much as I did. Perhaps my low, low expectations for this film is what made me enjoy it as much as I did, but I'm not gonna lie, I had an enjoyable movie-going experience.
-
-
chrischrisJun 21, 20090could this movie be any more insulting to GOD? This is one of the few movies I have ever walked out on. It was that bad.
-
-
ChadS.Jun 20, 20093
-
-
BobZhouJun 22, 200910BEST MOVIE EVER!!!!!! who cares if everything about it sucked. THis movie is the best movie ever its so epic!!! Screw everyone saying that its, " FLAWED" this movie doesn't rip off anything, its so origional
-
-
FantasyJun 22, 20090The less said the better. A waste of your time. Avoid.
-
-
MikeWJun 22, 20098
-
-
EnzoPlutonJun 22, 20092Sure year one had its laughs but it had so many stupid parts that I think this movie could be the worst movie of the summer.
-
-
DAVEJun 23, 20093Just plain unfunny. It gets a three because I laughed at the trailer.
-
-
JacobLJul 1, 20098
-
-
JoeMJul 2, 20091Save your money, do not go see this movie. It says it's a comedy, but I barely laughed at all while watching it.
-
-
BrianJ.Jul 24, 20093
-
-
JayFJul 3, 200910Awesome movie. The entire theater was in tears it was so funny.
-
-
AlSJul 30, 200910This is possibly the best movie of the year. The jokes, from lesbian innuendo to deadpan virginity references, are infinitely funnier than anything that "great comedies" like Dr. Strangelove or The Producers could ever come up with. Anyone who didn't like this movie either "had an IQ of above 80" or has no knowledge of what great film really is.
-
-
DanielWJul 3, 20099Excellent movie, everyone who disliked it can go watch the proposal or maybe enjoy some shindler's list whilst your at it, keep your boring movies to yourselves and let us have our great and fantastic bible spoof films like this its definitely better than any Monty python film.
-
-
KevinBJul 4, 20099Hysterically funny from about 10 minutes in to the very end, of course being very susceptible to sexual humor definitely helps.
-
-
ColinAug 5, 20098I thought it was a really funny, well made movie. Does not suck. At all.
-
-
TimothyT.Sep 26, 20094There's more humor in most thrillers than Year One.
-
-
PerverzBiOct 17, 20096
-
-
BenBOct 24, 20096The films opens with a strange but digestible set of caveman gags. The film however seems to continue with the same types of gags throughout various time periods without ever offering anything fresh. My the end of the movie, you are left in a dramatic climax scene full of characters that you have long stopped caring about, in a movie that has definitely overstayed its welcome.
-
-
JohnDOct 27, 200910Best movie of the year. Micheal Cera should win best supporting actor award. I would rank this as #3 all time behind Felini's 8 1/2 and Citizen Kane, and slightly ahead of Godfather part 1.
-
-
DerekH.Jun 19, 20097I will admit, the movie could have been a little more funny then what it actually was, but a decent script and some decent actors, with a decent concept and you got a decent movie.
-
-
BillH.Jun 19, 20097You'll be getting stoned....TODAY!!!!! Classic.
-
-
CJJun 21, 20090The entire movie contained forced comedy and lacked imagination. Many actor/actresses should be ashamed that their names and careers are tied to this piece. If you expect nothing from this movie, you are asking for too much.
-
-
MichaelOJun 21, 20098Are you kidding? Hilarious!
-
-
TDKinDallasJun 21, 20098
-
-
JeremyTokiJun 21, 20090Ridiculous. I eally wanted this movie to be funny and it sucked. What happened to Black and Cera? I had respect for them, but that's shaken now. Bottom Line: Horrible movie. Way too sacrilegious and just unfunny otherwise. Disappointing
-
-
SummerTJun 22, 20091I love Jack Black, but this was terrible. All of the funny parts were shown on the preview. This movie dragged the entire time, and I couldn't wait for it to be over.
-
-
DanDJun 24, 20095Thought the movie had some great jokes in there, with some really great potential, unfortunately they didn't do a great job tying it all together.
-
-
MaxMJun 25, 20097
-
-
BryanKJun 26, 200910
-
-
StacyWJun 28, 20091I LOVE Michael Cera, but this movie was just awful. Awful.
-
-
KeenanSJul 12, 20097
-
-
KevinC.Aug 29, 20090The best that could be said about this movie is that Jack Black and Michael Cera do a good job pretending that the script is funny. I firmly belive that all the actors in the movie plotted this terrible waste of eyesight so that on their next bomb everyone can say "At least it was not as bad as Year One".
-
-
JayH.Sep 29, 20094Harold Ramis is no Mel Brooks. The concept seemed funny, but there are way too many misses in the humor, as well as far too many male genitalia gags. Occasionally there are some laughs, the art direction and costumes are imaginative but otherwise it doesn't work.
-
-
RazvT.Nov 21, 20097I don't agree with all the negative grades. It was a good movie, funny scenes, jack black is funny as always and everything is ok.
-
-
Sep 28, 20102I rated this movie the total number of times I snickered throughout its entire 97 minutes. It really boils down to the fact that Jack Black and Michael Cera are a bad combo; combine that with the movie's lackluster writing and you get "Year One."
-
Aug 31, 20108
-
Feb 26, 20116This is one of those movies that you will love or hate. I actually enjoyed this flick. Sure the plot is horrible, dont make much sense. Pointless action scenes, acting isnt that its terrible its just a random movie, on a quest or lack off. If you like the cast then its worth a watch. If you like cornball movies this is for you. I love cornball movies as its my sense of humor.
-
Feb 1, 20115Year one is barely sporadically funny, predictabally lame, but the film does offer some rather surprising gross out gags, that some if not most summer comedy fans will enjoy
-
Feb 4, 201110I really don't understand the low rating because I absolutely loved this movie. I've watched it several times and could keep on watching it again and again. I wasn't a Jack Black fan before seeing this, but now I'm more interested in seeing his movies. Michael Cera was terrific, as one might expect.
-
Feb 6, 20110Awful movie. Jack Black just isn't funny. He has had one decent movie in the school of rock, and he has been riding that movie to bust after bust after bust. Cera never has been good. I have seen actors playing in high school plays perform better. I watched about 10 minutes of this movie. It had no plot, no character development, and was relying on the pre-teen/teen crowd to carry the ratings.
-
Aug 11, 20112I actually felt my I.Q. level fall at least a few points after this idiot-fest was over. I can also thank this movie for single-handedly destroying my respect for every actor in it, especially the two leads. Paul Rudd, how could you?
-
Oct 16, 20114Bought this on whim having missed it's release. After the opening scene, thought I was on to a winner, however the rest of the film failed to live up to the early promise. There are a few laughs to be had but generally it just isn't funny. The plot is far from smooth and most of the time it appears the actors are making the lines up as they go along.
-
May 3, 20126It was funny throughout. This parody movie has laughs and a bit of a heart. The story was much better than I had expected it to be.
-
Mar 13, 20120
prev
next
Page:
- 1
-
50Year One is not really THAT bad and not ENTIRELY without laughs.
-
20During all of the film's oh-so-long 97 minutes, Year One, barely earns a snicker.
-
25Any good will the movie generates, though, is grated right back off by Black, whose obnoxiousness has lost whatever charm it once possessed.