- Critic score
- Publication
- By date
-
'14 Shades of Grey' features no standout moments or highlights, just a formulaic, plodding, sixty plus moribund minutes that make this album about an hour too long. Avoid at all costs, even if you're a member of Staind's family.
-
Those who connect with Staind will likely find this more consistently satisfying than Break the Cycle.
-
Part of the problem is the thoroughly unimaginative production, a procession of soft-loud modern-rock cliches that breaks up the ho-hum guitar bashing with acoustic interludes and strings.
-
Like a crisp Xerox of the band's multiplatinum Break the Cycle, with everything sounding bigger, brighter and tighter.
-
Not memorable enough to be bad, not heavy enough to pack visceral power, most of these songseven radio-friendly ringers like "So Far Away"are indistinguishable from the work of a hundred other bands with misspelled names, hotshot producers, plentiful tattoos, and optional silly facial hair.
-
Blender14 Shades is nominally heavier than the group's two previous albums, though the band tempers its harsher instincts to let Lewis ruminate unmolested. [Aug 2003, p.132]
-
UncutAt times this album seems interminable. [Aug 2003, p.116]
-
Q MagazineAnother dollop of rock sludge with a remarkably honest title. [Aug 2003, p.115]
-
Alternative PressSince when is pairing Jewel's poetry outtakes with modern-rock riffs groundbreaking? [Aug 2003, p.102]
-
Entertainment WeeklyThe tedious MOR power ballads can't seem to get out of low gear. [13 Jun 2003, p. 96]
Awards & Rankings
User score distribution:
-
Positive: 34 out of 49
-
Mixed: 3 out of 49
-
Negative: 12 out of 49
-
ChrisHJan 12, 2007
-
JamesOSep 25, 2006
-
DustinKJun 25, 2006