A Bigger Bang
- The Rolling Stones
- Band Name: The Rolling Stones
- Record Label: Virgin
- Release Date: Sep 6, 2005
User Score
7.4
out of 10
Generally favorable reviews- based on 70 Ratings
User score distribution:
-
Positive: 56 out of 70
-
Mixed: 5 out of 70
-
Negative: 9 out of 70
Review this album
-
-
Please sign in or create an account before writing a review.
-
-
Submit
-
Check Spelling
-
Mar 9, 20128
-
zachmMay 8, 20079its good
-
-
StéphanieVApr 11, 200710
-
-
DrewJJan 31, 200710Rolling Stones still and will forever have what most bands going today can only dream about...straight through great ablum...The rest of modern rock has just got the shit kicked out of them by seventy year olds
-
-
DuckCDDec 18, 200610
-
-
ChuckSSep 23, 20064Not much to say about this.........lots of songs but .the lyrics are juvenile without much imagination. The drums and guitars let you know right off its the Stones, however.
-
-
steveLMar 23, 20066I find it a mixed bag. They can still write the riffs but the lyrics are a bit weak. Time to lose Don Was as producer and find someone willing to give orders rather than take them.
-
-
BeaufordePFeb 10, 200610This is the best rock album of 2005. The Stones reclaim the crown. There is some filler toward the end, but the body of this album is stunning in its eclecticism, range, and execution. Simply a breathtaking ride...the kind of album no other band in the world could make any more...or even dare try...except for the Stones.
-
-
MickJaggerJan 22, 20069There's no way that you can hate these guys! They are too cool for school! From the beginning to the end, the california raisins kick major butt!
-
-
MikeSJan 1, 20069One of the best albums they have ever done. I can't get enough of it.
-
-
NickRDec 27, 200510
-
-
LauraSDec 13, 200510I wasn't expecting too much when I bought Bigger Bang since their last few albums weren't the Stones of old. But now, since listening to it every day in my car, I absolutely think its one of their best albums in their history. It has the classic rock sound of the Stones, along with the bluesiness that has made them the greatest band of all time.
-
-
PaulGDec 10, 20059
-
-
SteveJDec 9, 200510
-
-
JimRNov 22, 20059best since tatoo you, mixes all areas of stones sound since the exile days, if they are going out on this one it's a fitting end!!
-
-
[Anonymous]Nov 20, 20052just because they rocked a long time ago doesnt make this album likeable. in other words it sux.
-
-
PaulHNov 7, 20053It's just boring music, from what use to be a great band, it's so dull and long. they should of ended the band after "Some Girls", we all know this though some (most) are in denial. The Stones have been embarassing themselves for the last 25 years.
-
-
AlanRNov 7, 20050Why won't Mick Jagger just die already? Then I might be able to listen to their back catalogue and not feel dirty.
-
-
SatanicMajestyColombiaNov 4, 20057
-
-
DavidNov 3, 20057
-
-
Rev.RikardOct 8, 20054
-
-
PeterMOct 5, 20056A bit disappointing,. I'm in the minority - I preferred their last two albums. Poorly produce, but worth a listen if only for the tightest rhythm section in rock; Jones and Watts are terrific
-
-
CarlosMOct 4, 200510Their Best Album since "Exile". It´s strong, smood, country. blues. They are The Rolling Stones.
-
-
mechallnOct 2, 20050crap! all crap! god i h8 these guys! if our country and our leaders suck so much, go live somewhere else! totally overrated artists.
-
-
MattSep 29, 20057It feels a little desperate to seem relevant, but there are many solid Rolling Stones moments.
-
-
PatMSep 28, 200510
-
-
CosmoPSep 27, 20054Glad to see Rolling Stone magizine still likes to suck dick.
-
-
jcarlsonSep 25, 20052The writing is weak and juvenile. Jagger has be come bitter and Richard and Wood can't lift these tunes above that or the song structure.
-
-
RandyDSep 19, 200510INCREDIBLE!!!!!! IS THERE AN 11 IN THE RATING CHART? Best Rolling Stones album in years!!!!!!Mick Jagger still has it!!!!! Lyrics and performing!!
-
-
JimSSep 18, 200510The best theyve done in 25 years! This is classic rock and powerful R&B This is a Stone"s masterpiece!!!
-
-
SeanSSep 13, 200510
-
-
JEREMYSSep 13, 20059
-
-
JosephKSep 13, 200510Best recording in years. Not over produced like the last couple of ones. There are plenty of good song s but the one that stand out the most to me is "Dangerous Beauty". Classic Stones riff with Jagger's hard driving lyrics. Incredible!!!!!
-
-
ShannonWSep 12, 20057
-
-
SteveCSep 11, 20059
-
-
JohnPSep 11, 20058
-
-
BMSep 10, 200510This is one great album. Once you've heard the separation of the instruments, you'll realize there are no bad songs. They groove very raunchy, bluezy, Mick in top form. I love TPIE. The Worlds Greatest Rock n Roll Band fo sho!
-
-
AtleticodeRafaela...Sep 9, 20054Rolling Stones: this album was unnecesary.
-
-
MikeHSep 9, 200510The Rolling Stones are the best band of all time and this just proves it again
-
-
peterwSep 9, 20059I'm amazed at how many tracks I enjoyed - felt that 60's part of me all over again! I espcially was moved by this place is empty, and of course streets of love
-
-
BKrackeSep 9, 20056Sounds more like Tattoo You and Black and Blue than it does Some Girls. Entertaining, great guitar licks as always but the lyrics are not up to the Stones best work. Also, too much variety in terms of song styles on this CD make it inconsistent and uneven.
-
-
BrianKSep 9, 20056
-
-
nevilleqSep 8, 200510they are back sounding early stones post altamont . brave to take the honest approach and sound like a stones album should + not follow 2005 5 minute pleasers
-
-
radarSep 8, 20053"Bridges To Babylon" is an impressingly lot better than this. Don't ask me what the Allmusic and RollingStone critics are thinking about - daring to tell people anything else. Wipe the dust off of your Babylon-disc and enjoy some good Stones instead!
-
-
steveMSep 8, 20054About four tracks show real effort (and kudos on "Sweet Neo Con", easily the best song on the CD). The remaining 12 tracks are anonymous knockoffs sprinkled with lyrics that make Spinal Tap jealous ("the phone kept ringing as we made sweet love"??). Did I really expect more? Foolishly, I did.
-
-
AndrewJSep 8, 20059just short of a classic...the best stones album since exile
-
-
GiulioSep 8, 20059The greatest rock 'n' roll band in the world is back!!! Better late than never ;-)
-
-
ErikPSep 7, 20059Good album, No really awesome songs on it but over all the music is good.
-
-
TimothyRSep 7, 20053This is not the big comeback we were all hoping for. This album is as ugly as Keith's leathery face. The lyrics do Spinal Tap proud and the music is dull and uninspired.
-
-
stevekSep 7, 20059best since some girls by far they will never stop evolving there jus missin 1 country song like far away eyes
-
-
SteveMcQueenSep 7, 20059A couple of duff tracks but Jagger sounds rejuvenated and the band are stonking
-
-
BrandonSSep 7, 20058Rock solid rock and roll. I for one don't mind that the lyrics aren't necessarily all that great. They're full of spite and raunch. - Jagger being Jagger. Great Stones album any way you look at it.
-
-
NiklasESep 7, 200510This is one of the best Stones records in a very long time.
-
-
RobertKSep 7, 20059Very good album, lots of energy and comparable to Some Girls. Mick Jagger really worked his ass off this time!
-
-
EricZSep 6, 20058A pretty good CD. While there are no "WOW that was amazing" hits there are a number of strong efforts. I love "Let Me Down Slow" and "Laugh, I Nearly Died." "Biggest Mistake" is pretty good too. And you've gotta love the Bush-bashing "Sweet Neo Con."
-
-
JoséRSep 6, 200510Amazing
-
-
A strong, engaging, cohesive Rolling Stones album that finds everybody in prime form.
-
70Some of their best work in nearly two decades.
-
4016 songs of stalwart Stones riffs that almost compensate for generally embarrassing lyrics. [10 Sep 2005]