All critic scores are converted to a 100-point scale. If a critic does not indicate a score, we assign a score based on the general impression given by the text of the review. Learn more...

100

Uncut

There are some outstanding songs here, and Jagger turns in a series of performances that are their match, full of much defiant flouncing, strutting bitchiness, preening arrogance, snarling haughtiness and a typically provocative misogyny. [Album of the Month, Oct 2005, p.92]

Village Voice (Consumer Guide)

Despite its lack of an anthem to replace "Start Me Up," it certainly beats Tattoo You or anything else going back to Exile except Some Girls.

Read Full Review >

Rolling Stone

A Bigger Bang is just a straight-up, damn fine Rolling Stones album, with no qualifiers or apologies necessary for the first time in a few decades.

Read Full Review >

All Music Guide

A strong, engaging, cohesive Rolling Stones album that finds everybody in prime form.

Read Full Review >

musicOMH.com

Though [A Bigger Bang] doesn't dare to place itself in the same hallowed halls as that Jimmy Miller-produced quartet of records between 1968 and 1972, it jostles justly and fairly with the best since.

Read Full Review >

Dot Music

The Stones in 2005 sound fresh and re-invigorated.

Read Full Review >

Blender

Without playing "best since" games, just say it ranks near the top of the eight [albums] they've manufactured since 1980. [Oct 2005, p.142]

Stylus Magazine

In its no-frills pleasures, A Bigger Bang recalls Some Girls and Emotional Rescue, two great meaningless albums.

Read Full Review >

cokemachineglow

Here, they succeed just by doing what they do best, taking few chances, but sounding more comfortable in their own skin than they have in a very long time.

Read Full Review >

The Onion (A.V. Club)

It's the best effort The Rolling Stones have produced in quite a while.

Read Full Review >

Mojo

Though not without the odd turkey, it is arguably their most satisfying work since 1978's Some Girls. [Oct 2005, p.100]

The New York Times

On "A Bigger Bang," the Stones actually sound like they're having fun together, live in a studio somewhere. [4 Sep 2005]

Amazon.com

Some of their best work in nearly two decades.

Read Full Review >

Entertainment Weekly

Instead of playing it slick, they've made their dirtiest, most homemade-sounding album since Some Girls.

Read Full Review >

PopMatters

Review #1: Perhaps the best thing about the album is that it's the Stones sticking to what they know. [score=70]; Review #2: The riffs are generic, the melodies don't stick, and the lyrics are insipid. [score=50]

The Guardian

There's plenty of spirit here but, sadly, the songwriting runs out of puff long before the performances do, lending a hammy tone to the album's weaker moments.

Read Full Review >

New Musical Express

So 'A Bigger Bang' is no masterpiece. As a loss leader to allow them to continue touring, it's not even as good as 'Don't Believe The Truth'. But it's the best record they were going to make, and a world with the Stones is better than one without them.

Read Full Review >

Q Magazine

It blows hot and cold. [Oct 2005, p.110]

Drowned In Sound

Unfortunately, by stretching the album to an unnecessarily long 16 tracks, ‘A Bigger Bang’ suffers from its fair share of non-starting filler.

Read Full Review >

Austin Chronicle

At 65 rocky minutes, the Stones' first studio album since 1997's Bridges to Babylon, and rootsiest since '94's Voodoo Lounge, could've been whambangthankyoumam at 40.

Read Full Review >

Billboard

16 songs of stalwart Stones riffs that almost compensate for generally embarrassing lyrics. [10 Sep 2005]

Paste Magazine

The ideas quickly wear thin. [Dec 2005, p.107]

What Our Users Said

The average user rating for this album is 7.6 (out of 10) based on 63 User Votes

Note: User votes are NOT included in the Metascore calculation.

zach m gave it a9:
its good

Stéphanie V gave it a10:
Great album! Definately 1000% STONES, blows your mind! They've done it again the Rolling Stones made a abso-fucking-lutely magnificent album once more ! The lyrics sound great - good old Jagger/Richards teamwork :) - and the RIFFS & MUSIC what can I say bold as ever. Every single 21th century band can wrap up, go home and change their nappies 'cos the Rolling Stones are in town again; LEAN & Mean as ever...

Drew J gave it a10:
Rolling Stones still and will forever have what most bands going today can only dream about...straight through great ablum...The rest of modern rock has just got the shit kicked out of them by seventy year olds

Duck CD gave it a10:
This is a very fine album, heartfelt and fierce like all their best work, but also tender, generous and brave enough to expose wounds that would sound silly in younger mouths. While it's not as darkly bold as "Undercover," which remains way underrated, its songs sneak up on you over time. You don't even realize till Track 4 that you're back in deep Stones territory... and then it keeps going deeper.

Chuck S gave it a4:
Not much to say about this.........lots of songs but .the lyrics are juvenile without much imagination. The drums and guitars let you know right off its the Stones, however.

steve L gave it a6:
I find it a mixed bag. They can still write the riffs but the lyrics are a bit weak. Time to lose Don Was as producer and find someone willing to give orders rather than take them.

Beauforde P gave it a10:
This is the best rock album of 2005. The Stones reclaim the crown. There is some filler toward the end, but the body of this album is stunning in its eclecticism, range, and execution. Simply a breathtaking ride...the kind of album no other band in the world could make any more...or even dare try...except for the Stones.

Music

Upcoming &Recent Releases

A Bigger Bang

Album Info

Summary

What The Critics Said

What Our Users Said

Upcoming &
Recent Releases