1. RenegadeNorman

   9

   The problem with the album is really the fans and critics. They expected AVD is be along the lines of "Cross, Part 2." I can tell you right now, if you expected AVD is be a follow up to and sound like "Cross", YOU WILL BE DISAPPOINTED. AVD is completely different from "Cross", as it more retro-rock instead of the dark opera-disco sound of "Cross." Is this bad? No, because it's always nice to have a change of sound.… Expand

   • Helpful? 1 of 1 users said Yes.
2. Robswift

   8

   When an album like this comes along, critics go insane because it is not what they expected, and they pan it because it isn't reminiscent of the artist's/group's previous album. Justice deserves the benefit of the doubt on this album: yes, it is different, but they are still tackling a focused idea - a synthesis of two genres (despite what Tiny Mix Tapes would like you to believe). Instead of tackling the extremely epic disco/dance sound again, they decided to go for a more alternative electro/rock style. Was the transition that bad? Any worse than Daft Punk's transition from Homework to Discovery? I don't think so, but, then again, I am not one of the published metacontrarians on this site.… Expand

   • Helpful? 9 of 9 users said Yes.
3. hydrawithears

   6

   It is very likely that two things will stay the same for Justice (Gaspard Augé and Xavier de Rosnay as their mums know them): the cross as their symbol and comparisons to Daft Punk, another French gods of house music. Canon of their latest album Audio, Video, Disco. (or I Hear, I See, I Learn) could be easily mistaken for Daft Punkâ… Expand

   • Helpful? 2 of 2 users said Yes.
4. elpwner

   0

   I signed up just to give this album a 0. If you like Justice, STAY AWAY FROM THIS ALBUM!
   It is a disappointment at least, and a failure at best. There is a reason that Justice never made there own music before. They are not musicians.
   
   RIP Justice. 2003-2011.… Expand

   • Helpful? 3 of 14 users said Yes.

See all 14 User Reviews