User Score
tbd

No user score yet- Awaiting 3 more ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 0 out of 1
  2. Negative: 0 out of 1
Buy Now
Buy on

Review this album

  1. Your Score
    0 out of 10
    Rate this:
    • 10
    • 9
    • 8
    • 7
    • 6
    • 5
    • 4
    • 3
    • 2
    • 1
    • 0
    • 0
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling
  1. Mar 5, 2013
    6
    Well, I'll start about the sound/production. It is better than on the previous releases and I'd even say that the album sounds overproduced. Most of the fans wanted to hear a more harsh sound just like it was before. About the music: it's a pity, but the band started to sound like very generic. A lot of trivial death metal riffs and the main letdown there are almost none of the slammingWell, I'll start about the sound/production. It is better than on the previous releases and I'd even say that the album sounds overproduced. Most of the fans wanted to hear a more harsh sound just like it was before. About the music: it's a pity, but the band started to sound like very generic. A lot of trivial death metal riffs and the main letdown there are almost none of the slamming grooves, which were always the best thing in their music (for me). So I'm pretty disappointed with this album. Expand
Metascore
54

Mixed or average reviews - based on 4 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 2 out of 4
  2. Negative: 0 out of 4
  1. Q Magazine
    Feb 20, 2013
    40
    Guttural, brutal, and very unpleasant. [Mar 2013, p.101]
  2. Feb 20, 2013
    80
    Excellent production by Erik Rutan (Hate Eternal) at his Mana Recording Studio in St. Petersburg, FL takes Conceived in Sewage to a higher level of eviscerating brutality.
  3. Feb 20, 2013
    70
    Sure some songs (“Heaving Acid”/“Parasitic Eruption”) are indistinguishable, but for the most part this record sweats malice in a straightforward, pulverizing kind of way.