- Critic score
- Publication
- By date
-
Space-rock aficionados will dig the zero-G atmosphere, but it meanders through excessive pockets better left unexplored.
-
UncutThe fact that Feathers never really goes anywhere is beside the point. [May 2005, p.106]
-
Under The RadarWhile they might not track as much rich sonic mud over these tracks as they have on past albums, it doesn't hurt for a band to clean up every once in a while. [#9]
-
Paste MagazineAn elongated, spacey drone of acidic riffage and flickering psych-rock ambience. [Apr/May 2005, p.135]
-
FilterFeathers isn't a bad album, just one without a discernable look--or hook. [#14, p.99]
-
They've built upon the calm, dreamy songcraft that highlighted previous efforts, but the risky sludgefeasts have lost much of their psychedelic bluster, sounding instead like mellowed-out Mudhoney B-sides.
-
Q MagazineToo much of Feathers sounds like extended noodling jams. [May 2005, p.121]
User score distribution:
-
Positive: 7 out of 7
-
Mixed: 0 out of 7
-
Negative: 0 out of 7
-
Apr 1, 2012
-
CharlieCWJun 17, 2006
-
StaceyHJan 10, 2006