Flowers - Joan of Arc
Flowers Image
Metascore
61

Generally favorable reviews - based on 9 Critics What's this?

User Score
tbd

No user score yet- Be the first to review!

Your Score
0 out of 10
Rate this:
  • 10
  • 9
  • 8
  • 7
  • 6
  • 5
  • 4
  • 3
  • 2
  • 1
  • 0
  • 0
  • Summary: The latest album for the Chicago band led by Tim Kinsella.
Score distribution:
  1. Positive: 2 out of 9
  2. Negative: 0 out of 9
  1. Joan Of Arc’s latest is much more abrasive, much edgier and squeamish than what I’ve come to expect from them. And that’s not a bad thing at all.
  2. Mostly, though, Flowers just feels like a breather album after the last two, a typical Joan of Arc album wholly trapped in the moment of creation.
  3. He and his mercenaries swing cleverly from noodly instruments to introspective acoustic ditties, but never settle down long enough to let their concoction congeal. [Jul 2009, p.127]
  4. There are actually some great moments in this jumbled incoherent mess. The problem is that Kinsella’s had ample time to convince me that his post-Cap’n Jazz stuff is somehow better, more-relevant, or even worthy of my time.
  5. 60
    Flowers, a collection of mystical-seeming noise collages, absurdist dirges, and Pavement soundalikes, is as listenable as it is difficult to pin down.
  6. 60
    Flowers is occasionally emotional, but really, Kinsella is all about an off-the-cuff approach. [Jul 2009, p.90]
  7. The ephemeral instrumetal tracks are less bothersome this time out but don't keep the band's tenth effort from eventually toppling over. [Summer 2009, p.66]

See all 9 Critic Reviews