From Here We Go Sublime
- The Field
User Score
6.6
out of 10
Generally favorable reviews- based on 375 Ratings
User score distribution:
-
Positive: 235 out of 375
-
Mixed: 42 out of 375
-
Negative: 98 out of 375
Review this album
-
-
Please sign in or create an account before writing a review.
-
-
Submit
-
Check Spelling
- User score
- Most active
- By date
- Most helpful
- Most Clicked
-
SimonC.Oct 30, 20073This is literally the worst album I've ever heard, It is ridiculously repetitive it sounds like your computer froze while playing music and its playing the same thing over and over again. It might sound alright at times but I can';t see how any talent in this music. Maybe I just don't understand it but in my opinion it should defiantly not be #1 let alone the top 10
-
-
JonathanOct 6, 20074Electronic music thrives on novelty - so I'm amazed that this album has received such glowing reviews. This kind of lush minimal proggy techno has been done a trillion times before. It's well crafted, but dull.
-
-
NatashaKMay 30, 20070An incredibly overrated album. I could understand appeal resting in the bland, sentimental accessibility
-
-
stemMay 10, 20071When these others say "minimal", take it to heart. It sucks.
-
-
AaronS.May 28, 20072Overrated. It's really nothing special.
-
-
BigSurMay 4, 20072Nothing that hasn't been done in a much more creative way before, even in mainstream music. To have this as the best rated record in 2007 implies the critics aren't mastering their craft. Listen to more music, guys!
-
-
TonyE.Jul 4, 20071If this is the best electronic album of 2007, let alone best album of 2007, we are all in trouble musically. Repetitive junk.
-
-
onyxE.Jul 9, 20074I love electronic music but this album is so overhyped it's ridiculous. TOTALLY OVERRATED!
-
-
GlenGOct 1, 20070
-
-
PaulCSep 25, 20073Vastly overrated, every album in the top ten is better than this one, and I've listened to them all.
-
-
chrissOct 14, 20070There was nothing really ground breaking about this album. Just became extremely repetitive.
-
-
JenSep 20, 20072What a waste of a really awesome title.
-
-
ToxtethO.Sep 24, 20070I dearly hope that something comes out that knocks this out of the top spot. This album was unlistenable to me.
-
-
STeveOct 14, 20073I'm a big fan of electronic music of all kinds, but this really isn't a very good album. I agree with the previous poster's point that all the other albums in the top ten are better than this one. How can you compare this tripe to Radiohead's "In Rainbows", for example? Insulting.
-
-
SteveCMay 1, 20074Has a couple of nice moments. Someone's been hacking Kate Bush up, which always triggers a warm feeling...
-
-
ChristianKMay 16, 20072
-
-
WTFJul 7, 20070wow this is seriously bad. I mean if I were in charge of this site I would be embarrased to have let such a mistake slip through.
-
-
TomWAug 14, 20071If this is the best album of 2007 we should all pack up and go home. Electronic music has never sounded this dull.
-
-
pix101Sep 3, 20073Must agree with what others have said, there is much better electronic music out there! I can't believe the hype for something so boring.
-
-
KristNJan 3, 20081I'm in shock and awe over the scores at metacritic and here. This is not good music nor does it sound like the group put any real heart into it. I bet they are all looking at each other and wondering how they got voted 3rd best of 07. I'm sure they are getting a big laugh over it. Truly horrible. I mean every song has the exact same beat. It's rave music...that's it!!!
-
-
BenjaminB.Mar 10, 20083I guess if your into this style of music you will enjoy it. I will give anything a chance and try to be as open minded as possible. With that being said this stuff is pretty weak, way over-rated, cause I wanted to hear what others are raving about but it wasn't there.
-
-
TomP.May 1, 20084
-
-
YouS.Oct 26, 20070The Chemical Brothers make this record look like toddlers. I did make this shit when I bought FL studio back in 99 as an amateur. This is garbage.
-
-
JoshB.Oct 5, 20070wtf is up with this? Sound like derivative, repetitive, boring electronica from 1997 to me.
-
-
EvanMApr 15, 20070Repetitive. Minimal predictable beats that go exactly where you think theyre going.
-
-
JSIlvaApr 18, 20072I really don't know why such a high note. Very repetitive, I cant see any fresh ideas, and by the 3rd track it starts to get really boring...(no, make it 2nd..)
-
-
DanielAApr 27, 20073This is highly overrated.
-
-
GiterdoneMay 16, 20071the score would place this album as being one of the greatest of all time....this site is officially broken and has lost all credibility.
-
-
shootsybootsyMay 24, 20070"...oops I'm sorry I was looking for the music department."
-
-
StephenEMay 28, 20073Why is this rated at the top of Meta Critic? Terrible.
-
-
BrendanDMay 3, 20072
-
-
AlunpMay 6, 20074Not sure why the reviews are so high? There are no bad songs but the rating on Metacritc ranks it as one of the best albums of all time? After listening theres not really much you can remember of the stand out songs
-
-
AlanPMay 7, 20074All I have to say is that the music does not live up to the critics hype. simple.
-
-
MattD.May 9, 20073This is just goopy techno stuff. Big on sound effects but nothing else. It often amazes me what gets high and low ratings from critics. Just follow your own taste.
-
-
esssJun 2, 20074I found it very repetitive and was disappointed. Maybe it would have been more impressive if I'd been tripping balls on E or something. My gf can't even be in the same room as this CD.
-
-
emilywJun 26, 20073Finally this boring cd's rating is coming down a little bit. It still saddens me though that this has a 90 when stellar stuff like The National, Of Montreal, and Feist deserve to be the top three albums of the year thus far. Boo to boring electronica that goes absolutely nowhere. Give me a laptop and while put out something at least ten times as interesting as this tripe.
-
-
AlfR.Jul 10, 20072It's never better than ok and frankly, most of the time it's a snooze. As an EP, it might've worked but the lack of ideas or even a different tempo make this pretty damn soporific.
-
-
ChrisHJul 21, 20070One of the worst albums I ever heard - it would be annoying if it was not so endlessly boring.
-
-
StephenUJul 25, 20073
-
-
RichieHJul 4, 20070Absolute rubbish. Those rating this album highly have been spoon-fed an opinion. Fucking conformists.
-
-
JodieLJul 6, 20071
-
-
SteveRAug 18, 20070He, you reader, you've got only one single life; don't waste your time by listening to this music. He, you metacritic, I demand more professional reviews to decrease the high score this album really doesn't deserve.
-
-
RobSAug 20, 20070This album has inspired me to create my own electronic music.
-
-
TiagoMAug 25, 20074
-
-
MusicfanSep 17, 20070This album, I believe, is good for what it is - an electronic album strictly for electronic fans. It has zero value for most of the other people.
-
-
SteveF.Sep 9, 20074The only track that really commands your attention is "Mobilia" - and it gets old *really* fast. The most overrated record of all time.
-
-
DennisPJan 24, 20084At first, I really thought there was something wrong with my computer (I ripped the cd onto the laptop). It didn't take long to realize that it was supposed to sound like that. Not sure if that's my thing. I want to listen more to give it a fair shake, but a few of the tones, repeated ad nauseam, seem to really upset my dogs.
-
-
PeterB.Mar 11, 20080Absolute rubbish. I bought this blindly from the reviews and it's god-awful. Maybe mildly decent if you're on E, but strictly on it's on the music is worthless.
-
-
BlabBlabJul 30, 20080terribly boring. best album of the year? jesus, by the end of track 1 you've heard the entire album 4 times. dull
-
-
SemolinaP.Oct 6, 20072
-
-
BjorkReznorApr 15, 20072This album is horrible, and the fact that it's #1 for 2007 is clearly nothing more than an embarrassing pitfall of Metacritic's aggregation system. With a larger sample size, the ratings would plummet.
-
-
EricApr 18, 20072
-
-
waymanrMay 1, 20074Are you serious? Can't live without this trite drivel? Astounding that one would even suggest such a notion. It is elementary at best and worth a few spins at some clubs in Europe. It sounded like my old 8-bit nintendo playing Mario Brothers.
-
-
KyleMay 1, 20070Is this a massive april fool's joke? I was unfortunate enough to buy this steaming turd of an album based on the metacritic score and can't believe my ears. How could this be the best reviewed album of 2007? I would rather be punched in the face for an hour than listen to this thing again.
-
-
PaulWMay 15, 20072Absolutely nowhere near as good as the ratings, really VERY dull.
-
-
MikeMMay 19, 20072BORING!!!!!
-
-
DivagazioniNMay 22, 20072Un disco inascoltabile, ripetitivo in tutte le sue tracce troppo elettroniche
-
-
simsimMay 27, 20072eh!? another overated album. metacritic really fails bringging the good stuff over the bad stuff. its basically some dance music overlooped with some cheesy baselines and a flat atmospheric part. Someone who thinks any good of this album should make an ear over good ambient stuff , look at bluemars, sky fm, groove salad, youll hear tons of better stuff for free over internet radio.
-
-
HexumSMay 6, 20070
-
-
JamesDMay 6, 20074This is a prime example of why Metacritic dosen't always (really) work. It's a bland, uninspired headache of an album, that sounded good to a few bland & uninspired reviewers. When real and effective original music is very much alive, thers's no need for such regressive piddle.
-
-
DaveMMay 8, 20072
-
-
PrometheusFJun 17, 20072
-
-
maxwJun 22, 20072i don't understandt very horrible album i like only one song (the second)
-
-
tokyopimpJun 23, 20071
-
-
BenJ.Jun 27, 20070I've listened to this album at a friend's request. It is awful. There is very little on this that I find worthy of being considered music.
-
-
JTRJun 28, 20074What's the big deal here? Why are so many critics losing their minds over this trite, predictable, paint by numbers trance album that sounds like it fell through a wormhole from 1998? Seriously, electronic music has evolved far and wide from this car commercial music.
-
-
PamPhletJun 3, 20071What a steaming pile of dump.
-
-
JosephJul 18, 20070This is not a dance album like Justice. This is not a trance album. This album is not meant to revolutionize electronic music. This one is about sentimentality, vague vision, minimalism and shoddy production. Forget the high metacritic score and the ranting users, hang out on the beach sober and completely ignoring it.
-
-
TedMJul 23, 20071I played this album, got through about 3 tracks and had to stop it. It is just boring and completely overrated. Can't believe this is metacritics best album of the year! Serious loss of credibility for the site. But I guess that can mainly be blamed on the journalists who raved about this pile of mediocre cr@p.
-
-
BradNJul 26, 20070This is not
-
-
MDunnJul 3, 20070Take a thump from New Order and a wash from Giorgio Moroder. This is crap.
-
-
charleye.Aug 9, 20071Why do most critically acclaimed albums fall on deaf ears? Because they are horrible, emotionless, and empty - like reviewers. I can't stand this album. It's dull, dull, dull. It's absolutely depressing that people could like this.
-
-
NiklasSep 15, 20071wtf? How can it be so high rated when it sucks this much!...it sounds like something went wrong in my computer now like music (but perhaps it's just me, who doesn't know anything about techno?)
-
-
SamS.Sep 21, 20071Garbage!
-
-
TwelveVoltsSep 20, 20070Truly horrible.
-
-
MarkD.Apr 11, 20083Easily the most over-rated album of 2007. I listened to this album repeatedly trying to give it a chance. I guess I just don't get the house phenomenon. If you are not a fan of this style of music don't even attempt to appreciate this album.
-
-
JakeD.Oct 15, 20071I'm still thinking this is a huge critical joke. Interesting concept, horrible payoff.
-
-
NiallSDec 17, 20073Maybe it's a Grower but I've listened to this album 3-4 times and can't see what I'm supposed to see in it.
-
-
mikeyfApr 13, 20072reedy & callow.
-
-
EricMApr 15, 20074Not sure what the hype is about. There's much more interesting stuff our there.
-
-
kevinpApr 18, 20074wow, people actually like this shit?
-
-
DaveApr 21, 20070You people are lemmings, this muisc is so boring, think for yourselves
-
-
GrahamWApr 22, 20072No idea why this is getting such rave reviews, agree with Evan, it is extremely repetitive, sounds like a cd skipping. Certainly not a 95.
-
-
SantiagoSMay 16, 20073I can´t believe that a simple album like this has this rating!!!
-
-
KyleRJun 26, 20070Tokyopimp. You have vocalized my opinion in a way my own mind could not.
-
-
LiamAJul 31, 20070To all you indie scene hipster hacks who are influenced by Pitchfork, don
-
-
whatadickAug 29, 20070
-
-
CharlieJan 25, 20082Being simple is fine, but being redundant is another thing. The thing is, there are so many better trance charts out there with much more to offer.
-
-
Aug 20, 20100As others have mentioned, this is a hugely over-rated album. Only mainstream music critics seem to think that this guy is such a huge talent. There's a reason why his tunes aren't spun much by the major progressive DJs: his house music ain't that great. It's house music (or "techno," as most of the people who listen to this no doubt call it) for the Starbucks set.
-
85If you like minimal electronic music at all, you must seek it out.
-
100This is one of those rare albums that makes you wonder how you ever got by without it.
-
This is an album you could easily hate -- especially if you like things like change and development.