Good Morning Revival - Good Charlotte
Metascore
45 out of 100

Mixed or average reviews - based on 18 Critics

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 3 out of 18
  2. Mixed: 11 out of 18
  3. Negative: 4 out of 18
view
per page
  1. New Musical Express (NME)
    30
    Vile, goth-jock pop with all the wit and nuance of a urine-soaked sock.
  2. cokemachineglow
    20
    The problem is that for all the slick operations and glorious machinations of the marketing and production, this band has run out of steam; soulless without being undead.
  3. The Guardian
    20
    A fourth album of stunning fatuousness.
  4. The New York Times
    20
    A mystifyingly inept CD that includes some of the worst lyrics you will — or, with any luck, won’t — hear all year. [26 Mar 2007]

User Reviews

All reviews »
User Score
5.9 out of 10

Mixed or average reviews- based on 111 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 33 out of 68
  2. Mixed: 3 out of 68
  3. Negative: 32 out of 68
  1. Screenager
    3
    Good Charlotte have once again become a rock band cliché by including electronic influences into their music like Radiohead and U2 before themm. The only difference here is that the songs are dull with lyrics about fame and how shallow the band members lives are. Even with a cameo from Avenged Sevenfold (which is wasted) this is an album that can't be saved except by burning it.… Full Review »
  2. greenandblackhe
    10
    Yes very fun album and great melody i believe this is one of their best, DFA really great song and the River very great singles . fun energetic great vocals from JOel himself overall a cohesive album and i cant believe also for the reviews this one is even better than Cardiology… Full Review »
  3. JoelW.
    10
    While this isn't the most mature album they've done it is very catchy and does still have some songs that show depth. it is really catchy and i love take your hands off my girl and the river. good job good Charlotte! i look forward to seeing what you do next.… Full Review »
See all user reviews »