Hourglass - Dave Gahan
Metascore
64 out of 100

Generally favorable reviews - based on 18 Critics

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 9 out of 18
  2. Negative: 0 out of 18
  1. These songs show him in a newly redemptive prime, and will satisfy both short and long term devotees.
  2. This kind of electro-glam was acceptable in the Eighties, and Hourglass proves that it still is.
  3. Gahan hasn't arrived at the palace of wisdom yet, but it sounds like he's enjoying travelling this new route there.
  4. There are a couple of moments where Hourglass works perfectly.
  5. Gahan has crafted an genuine album utilizing old and new tricks in surprisingly adept and original ways. [Fall 2007, p.73]
  6. A more electronic, better built, and altogether better deal than "Monsters," thanks mostly to the singer and-don't-you-forget-to-mention songwriter's better sense of self.
  7. Dave Gahan wisely returns to the highly synthesized electronica of his main band Depeche Mode.
  8. Gahan has actually made one of the year's best-sounding electronic releases, containing a surprisingly small number of cringe-inducing moments.
  9. For the most part Dave Gahan has a lot of catching up to do after his lackluster solo debut, and Hourglass, while an improvement, will likely suffer from the continued fallout of "Paper Monsters."
  10. 60
    Hourglass plays the "I, an artist" card with equal earnestness, a collection of electronic songs that mix dungeon-master sexual predation with angst-ridden introspection. [Nov 2007, p.104]
  11. 60
    Gahan is a way off from being a David Sylvian–-but not as far as you might think.
  12. It's a vibrant affair. [Nov 2007, p.138]
  13. On Hourglass, he makes a very Depeche-sounding album indeed.
  14. Hourglass isn't a perfect album by any means, but it's got enough really good stuff on it to make your overlook the not-so-good.
  15. The problem is that while Hourglass has Gahan sounding a lot more assured and competent as a songwriter, it's also too much what you'd expect of him.
  16. 50
    Houglass blatantly resembles sedate, later-day Depeche. [Nov 2007, p.118]
  17. Some songs start out peppy and intriguing, but his moaning over top sucks all the life out of the groove.
  18. Left to his own devices, Gahan, a mediocre songwriter at best, is forced to rely mostly on personality. Hourglass, his second solo album, is more a collection of moods than tunes.
User Score

Universal acclaim- based on 23 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 14 out of 15
  2. Negative: 0 out of 15
  1. 8
    This album is better enjoyed in an entire sitting, rather than picking out individual tracks. It certainly slopes downward in tempo after Deeper And Deeper, which is painfully beautiful but could be somewhat misleading to the listener. A very dark album, which gives us an insight to a breakaway solo artist's emotions. Standout Tracks: Saw Something, Kingdom, Deeper And Deeper, Endless. Full Review »
  2. JulianG
    9
    Very interesting. I haven't expected that much from Dave (I mean, I absolutely love his 'Depeche Mode voice'... but...). There are many good texts and I claim that other people insinuating that it is too much a Depeche-like album to be good are pretty wrong: cannot they see (hear) the difference? Anyway, critics in general are so skilled to denigrate artists and their work, that it doesn't seem astonishing... Even if there are some similarities - and 'its absolutely not a problem, considering his amazing Depeche performances - why doesn't he have the right to bring a little of their atmosphere in his own songs? No, I think we have here a good stuff. Full Review »
  3. ChamperD
    9
    Noy perfect, but I just love it.